Skip to content

Evaluation of GeoHAI Implementation

GeoHAI Implementation in IP Workflow

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05612672
Enrollment
25
Registered
2022-11-10
Start date
2023-02-13
Completion date
2026-09-01
Last updated
2026-05-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Clostridioides Difficile Infection, Healthcare Associated Infection

Keywords

Geographic information system

Brief summary

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and spatial analysis have become important tools in public health informatics but have rarely been applied to the hospital setting. In this study we apply these tools to address the challenge of Hospital Acquired Infections (HAIs) by building, implementing, and evaluating a new computer application which incorporates mapping and geographic data to assist hospital epidemiologists in identifying HAI clusters and assessing transmission risk. We expect that incorporation of geographic information into the workflow of hospital epidemiologists will have a profound effect on our understanding of disease transmission and HAI risk factors in the hospital setting, radically altering the workflow and speed of response of infection preventionists and improving their ability to prevent HAIs.

Detailed description

Hospital Acquired Infections are common, affecting 3.2% of acute care hospital admissions. Recent reports have shown an improvement in overall HAI rates, primarily driven by improvements in surgical site (SSI) and catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI). Transmissible infections, such as Clostridium difficile (CDI), have not shown the same decrease over time. This may be because prevention of CDI requires a comprehensive hospital-wide approach addressing environmental and patient-level risk factors. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and spatial analysis techniques have become an important tool in public health informatics because they can integrate a vast number of data sources and explore associations and patterns in the data not visible using traditional biostatistical methods. Applications of GIS and spatial analysis are wide ranging but have largely been ignored in the hospital setting. The objective of this research is to develop a HAI assessment tool, which incorporates geographic data on the hospital and patient-level data from the electronic health record system, that is useful for hospital infection preventionists in better identifying clusters of HAI and assessing potential risk. We bring together a multidisciplinary team of clinical, operational, and academic investigators with expertise in GIS and spatial analysis, patient safety, public health informatics, usability assessment, and mixed- methods evaluation. As part of a larger study, this aim will seek to implement a GeoHAI tool that uses spatio-temporal Bayesian models to identify clusters of NHSN-defined hospital onset CDI and multidrug resistant organisms (MDRO) and predict potential high risk areas given hospital and patient risk factors. Unique to our approach is an evaluation strategy that focuses on the reduction of hospital acquired infection, but also seeks to understand how the tool and the information derived from the tool impacts patient safety practices in the hospital. We expect the implementation of this tool to radically change the workflow and speed of response of infection preventionists, greatly improving their ability to prevent HAI instead of reacting after they have occurred.

Interventions

OTHERGeoHAI

A Geographic healthcare-associated infection (HAI) visualization and assessment tool (GeoHAI) which uses spatio-temporal Bayesian models to identify clusters of National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN)-defined hospital onset Clostridium difficile (CDI) and multidrug resistant organisms (MDRO), and predict potential high risk areas given hospital and patient risk factors.

Sponsors

Ohio State University
Lead SponsorOTHER
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
CollaboratorFED
University of Florida
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants will get the intervention and outcomes will be measured pre- and post-implementation

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Infection preventionist or physician involved in infection prevention at participating health system

Exclusion criteria

* Not an infection preventionist nor a physician involved in infection prevention * Does not work at the participating health system

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline Healthcare-Associated Infection (HAI) RateBaseline and 3 months post-implementationHAI rate at healthcare system level before intervention and after

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knowledge of toolImmediately post-trainingKnowledge questions to assess understanding of how to use the GeoHAI tool, assessed after participants are trained on how to use the tool
Change from baseline skill confidenceBaseline, 1 month post-implementationSelf-reported level of confidence on investigating HAI clusters
Usability scoreImmediately post training, 1 month post-implementationSystem Usability Scale score, and impacts of the tool on work and workflow (interruptions, workarounds, issues/challenges)
GeoHAI Use1 month post-implementationSelf-reported frequency of use of the GeoHAI tool
Change in Healthcare-Associated Infection (HAI) Investigation ProcessBaseline, 1 month post-implementationChange in how infection preventionists investigate Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs)
Number of months healthcare system is below goal HAI rateBaseline, 3 months post-implementationMonthly HAI rate at healthcare system level before intervention and after
Change in feasibility scoreImmediately post training, 1 month post-implementationScore on feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness domains of validated Implementation Outcome scale (minimum score = 1, maximum score = 5, where higher scores indicate better feasibility)
Change in time to HAI cluster identificationBaseline, 3 months post-implementationTime from when an HAI test was ordered for the first positive patient ultimately contained in an identified HAI cluster, to when that HAI cluster is identified.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORCourtney Hebert, MD

Ohio State University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 6, 2026