Obesity, Morbid
Conditions
Keywords
procedure: sleeve gastrectomy, bariatric surgery, procedure: single anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass
Brief summary
This study will compare two bariatric surgical interventions in terms of weight loss, gastroesophageal reflux, and effects on obesity-related comorbid conditions in morbidly obese patients.
Detailed description
Sleeve gastrectomy is an established therapeutic option for morbidly obese patients without preexisting gastroesophageal reflux disease. The novel single anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass (SASI) procedure is already introduced in Norway at a private high-volume bariatric hospital. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of SASI in comparison to an established bariatric procedure, i.e. sleeve gastrectomy. The primary end point is 2-year changes in BMI after sleeve gastrectomy and SASI.
Interventions
PROCEDURESingle anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass
The abdominal cavity is entered directly (visual trocar) with or without the use of Verres needle. A 6-port set up and a liver retractor is utilized. A sleeve gastrectomy is performed as described below, but division of the stomach starts 6 cm proximal to the pylorus. The small bowel is measured 300cm from the ileocecal valve, with the small bowel stretched and markers placed on the graspers, and connected to the antrum of the stomach with a 45mm stapler. The anastomosis is positioned slightly ventral on the antrum. A 12 mm port positioned left to the midline is used for introduction of the stapler, which is directed distally from the patient's left to right side. 3.0 cm of 45 mm stapler is used the anastomosis; completed with a 2-0 PDS running suture. The biliopancreatic limb is anchored to the sleeve 4 cm proximal to the anastomosis (non-resorbable V-loc 3-0). Fascia defect is closed for the port where the specimen is extracted. The mesenteric defect is not closed.
PROCEDURESleeve gastrectomy
In the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, the abdominal cavity is entered directly with a visual trocar with or without the use of Verres needle. The set up includes a total of 5 ports. The Natanson liver retractor is utilized. The greater omentum is separated from the major side of the stomach from the pylorus to the angle of His. The left crus is visualized and the hiatus is inspected for the presence of hernia. A 36 French bougie is introduced and the stomach is divided along this from 4-5cm proximal to the pylorus to 1cm lateral to the angle of His using two purple cartridges (Medtronic Tri-Staple™ technology) followed by beige 60mm cartridges to the angle of His, 1 cm lateral to the esophagus. The sleeve is tested for leaks with instillation of 50ml methylene blue in the tube. The fascia defect is closed with suture for the port site where the specimen is extracted.
Sponsors
Oslo University Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Masking description
Patients are allocated to surgical treatment 2 weeks before surgery and blinded to treatment allocation until the first postoperative day.
Intervention model description
Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to sleeve gastrectomy or SASI. The randomization list will contain block sizes of 4 and 6 in random order, stratified by study center.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Morbid obesity at referral for bariatric surgery (i.e. a body-mass index \[BMI\] of ≥35 kg/m2 with obesity-related comorbid conditions or ≥40 kg/m2 with or without such comorbidities). 2. Age 20-60 years. 3. Previous failed attempts of weight loss. 4. Norwegian speaking patients.
Exclusion criteria
1. BMI ≥55 kg/m2. 2. A history of major abdominal or bariatric surgery (excluding appendectomy, cholecystectomy, and sectio). 3. Established disabling cardiopulmonary disease, ongoing treatment for cancer, long-term steroid use, and conditions believed to be associated with poor adherence after surgery. 4. Previous or current gastroesophageal reflux symptoms with daily use of antireflux medication. Patients are also excluded if preoperative manometry identifies a hiatal hernia (≥4cm in axial length) or if preoperative upper endoscopy identifies esophagitis grade C or D (LA classification), peptic stricture, Barrett's esophagus, or esophageal carcinoma. 5. Achalasia 6. Pregnancy.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in body-mass index (BMI) | 2 year | Weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters after sleeve gastrectomy and SASI. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in prevalence of esophagitis. | 2 year | Changes in the prevalence of esophagitis as evaluated by upper endoscopy. |
| Change in prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease. | 2 year | Changes in the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease as evaluated by 24-hour pH measurements. |
| Complications | 6 weeks (100 days for deaths), 2 year, 5 year | Complications during surgery, postoperative complications (within 6 weeks \[100 days for deaths\]) as defined by the Accordion severity grading system and long-term complications. |
| Obesity-related comorbid conditions. | 2 year, 5 year | Changes in obesity-related comorbid conditions. |
| Vitamin concentrations | 2 year, 5 year | Changes in vitamin levels (A, B1, B6, B9, B12, C, D, K). |
| Health-related quality of life | 2 year, 5 year | The RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survery is a self-reporting questionnaire. Items are scored from 0 (lowest score) to 100 (highest possible score). |
| Obesity-related symptoms | 2 year, 5 year | Obesity-related Problem scale |
| Gastrointestinal symptoms | 2 year, 5 year | GSRS |
| Gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms | 2 year, 5 year | GERDq |
| Bowel habits | 2 year, 5 year | Bowel habit questionnaire |
| Revisional surgery | 2 year, 5 year | Revisional surgery rates in the two groups. |
| Long-term changes in BMI | 5 years | BMI (weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) after sleeve gastrectomy and SASI. |
| Body composition | 2 years | Changes in percentage fat mass and lean mass; percentage change in bone mineral density in lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck, and total hip as assessed by DEXA scan. |
Countries
Norway
Contacts
CONTACTHelene M Haug, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORTorgeir T Søvik, MD, PhD
Oslo University Hospital
Outcome results
None listed