Pseudophakia
Conditions
Keywords
Eyhance, Pseudophakia
Brief summary
This is a non-interventional prospective, single center, bilateral, non-randomized, open-label, observational clinical study. All patients will have had bilateral implantation of an Eyhance IOL at the time of cataract surgery. These patients will then be compared to assess which patient biometric properties (such as spherical aberration, q value, pupil size, etc.) lead to an overall increase in near or intermediate vision as well as overall patient satisfaction.
Detailed description
This is a non-interventional prospective, single center, bilateral, non-randomized, open-label, observational clinical study. All patients will have had bilateral implantation of an Eyhance IOL at the time of cataract surgery. These patients will then be assessed in the 1-6-month post-operative period. Patients will be grouped into two arms: distance with minimal intermediate and distance with enhanced intermediate/near based on mean photopic binocular BCDVA and DCIVA (at 66 cm) of patients with bilateral Eyhance IOLs corrected to plano sphere. The distance with minimal intermediate group is defined by BCDVA of 0.1 logMAR or better but a DCIVA of 0.4 logMAR or worse. The distance with enhanced intermediate/near is defined by BCDVA of 0.1 logMAR or better and a DCIVA of 0.3 logMAR or better. In addition to binocular BCDVA and DCIVA, monocular measurements will be obtained as well. The two groups will be compared to assess which patient biometric properties (such as spherical aberration, q value, pupil size, etc.) lead to an overall increase in near or intermediate vision as well as overall patient satisfaction. Biometric data will be obtained from the Zeiss IOL Master 700, Atlas 9000, and the iTrace.
Interventions
Measurement of distance, intermediate and near visual acuity.
Measurement of biometric data will be obtained from the Zeiss IOL Master 700, Atlas 9000, and the iTrace.
Patients will complete a Patient Questionnaire to determine their level of spectacle independence and visual acuity satisfaction.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Adults, 40 years of age having already undergone uncomplicated cataract removal by phacoemulsification with a clear corneal incision in both eyes. 2. Implantation of bilateral Eyhance IOLs (DIB00/DIU\*\*\*). 3. Able to comprehend and willing to sign informed consent and complete all required testing procedures. 4. Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) projected to be 0.10 logMAR (Minimum Angle of Resolution) or better. 5. Clear intraocular media. 6. Minimum of two weeks post YAG capsulotomy to treat PCO
Exclusion criteria
1. Any corneal abnormality, other than regular corneal astigmatism (as determined by pre-operative testing) that in the opinion of the investigator would confound the outcome(s) of the study. 2. Any complication during cataract surgery (capsular tear, vitrectomy, etc.). 3. History of or current retinal conditions or predisposition to retinal conditions. 4. Amblyopia or strabismus in either eye. 5. History of or current anterior or posterior segment inflammation of any etiology. 6. Any form of neovascularization on or within the eye. 7. Glaucoma (uncontrolled or controlled with medication). 8. Optic nerve atrophy. 9. Subjects with diagnosed degenerative eye disorders. 10. Postoperative CDVA worse than 0.10 logMAR (20/25 snellen). 11. Subjects who have an acute or chronic disease or illness that would confound the results of this investigation in the opinion of the investigator (e.g. immunocompromised, connective tissue disease, clinically significant atopic disease, etc.).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of Two Groups Categorized by Distance With Minimal Intermediate and Distance With Enhanced Intermediate/Near Based on Mean Photopic Binocular DCIVA (at 66 cm) of Patients With Bilateral Eyhance IOLs Corrected to Plano Sphere. | 1 day (between a minimum of 3 weeks postoperative up to 26 weeks post-operative) | To compare two groups categorized by distance with minimal intermediate and distance with enhanced intermediate/near based on mean photopic binocular DCIVA (66 cm) of patients with bilateral Eyhance IOLs targeted corrected at plano sphere. |
| Comparison of Two Groups Categorized by Distance With Minimal Intermediate and Distance With Enhanced Intermediate/Near Based on Mean Photopic Binocular BCDVA of Patients With Bilateral Eyhance IOLs Corrected to Plano Sphere. | 1 day (between a minimum of 3 weeks postoperative up to 26 weeks post-operative) | To compare two groups categorized by distance with minimal intermediate and distance with enhanced intermediate/near based on mean photopic binocular BCDVA of patients with bilateral Eyhance IOLs targeted corrected at plano sphere. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Spherical Aberration Between Groups | 1 day (between a minimum of 3 weeks postoperative up to 26 weeks post-operative) | — |
| Biometric Data (Anterior Chamber Depth and Axial Length) Between Groups. | 1 day (between a minimum of 3 weeks postoperative up to 26 weeks post-operative) | To determine if any statistically significant differences in biometric data exists between the two groups that may allow for pre-operative recognition of those patients who could have enhanced benefits of the Eyhance IOL. This will require multiple regression analysis given the large number of variables. |
| Q Value Between Groups. | 1 day (between a minimum of 3 weeks postoperative up to 26 weeks post-operative) | Q-value is an assessment of corneal asphericity. * A value of 0 indicates a cornea that is perfectly spherical * A value between -1 and 0 indicates a cornea that is shaped more like a football * A value between 0 and 1 indicates a cornea that is shaped more like a dish |
| Determine if Any Statistically Significant Differences in Pupil Size Exists Between the Two Groups. | 1 day (between a minimum of 3 weeks postoperative up to 26 weeks post-operative) | To determine if any statistically significant differences in pupil size exists between the two groups that may allow for pre-operative recognition of those patients who could have enhanced benefits of the Eyhance IOL. This will require multiple regression analysis given the large number of variables. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of a Patient Satisfaction Survey Between the Two Groups to Assess for Subjective Differences in Everyday Life. Patient's Answers Will be on a Scale Between Always and Never, Where Never Shows a Better Patient Outcome. | 1 day (between a minimum of 3 weeks postoperative up to 26 weeks post-operative) | Comparison of a patient satisfaction survey between the two groups to assess for subjective differences in everyday life to determine if the enhanced vision plays a statistically significant difference in patient's perceived quality of vision or quality of life. Patient's answers will be on a scale between always and never, where never shows a better patient outcome. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Distance With Minimal Intermediate Visual Acuity Group Patients with bilateral implantation of Eyhance IOLs. And defined by BCDVA of 0.1 logMAR or better but a DCIVA of 0.4 logMAR or worse.
Visual Acuity: Measurement of distance, intermediate and near visual acuity.
Biometric Data Collection: Measurement of biometric data will be obtained from the Zeiss IOL Master 700, Atlas 9000, and the iTrace.
Patient Questionnaire: Patients will complete a Patient Questionnaire to determine their level of spectacle independence and visual acuity satisfaction. | 49 |
| Distance With Enhanced Intermediate/Near Visual Acuity Group Patients with bilateral implantation of Eyhance IOLS. And defined by BCDVA of 0.1 logMAR or better and a DCIVA of 0.3 logMAR or better.
Visual Acuity: Measurement of distance, intermediate and near visual acuity.
Biometric Data Collection: Measurement of biometric data will be obtained from the Zeiss IOL Master 700, Atlas 9000, and the iTrace.
Patient Questionnaire: Patients will complete a Patient Questionnaire to determine their level of spectacle independence and visual acuity satisfaction. | 61 |
| Total | 110 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Distance With Minimal Intermediate Visual Acuity Group | Distance With Enhanced Intermediate/Near Visual Acuity Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 69.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5 | 69.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.3 | 69.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 34 Participants | 24 Participants | 58 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 15 Participants | 37 Participants | 52 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 49 | 0 / 61 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 49 | 0 / 61 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 49 | 0 / 61 |
Outcome results
Comparison of Two Groups Categorized by Distance With Minimal Intermediate and Distance With Enhanced Intermediate/Near Based on Mean Photopic Binocular BCDVA of Patients With Bilateral Eyhance IOLs Corrected to Plano Sphere.
To compare two groups categorized by distance with minimal intermediate and distance with enhanced intermediate/near based on mean photopic binocular BCDVA of patients with bilateral Eyhance IOLs targeted corrected at plano sphere.
Time frame: 1 day (between a minimum of 3 weeks postoperative up to 26 weeks post-operative)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Distance With Minimal Intermediate Visual Acuity Group | Comparison of Two Groups Categorized by Distance With Minimal Intermediate and Distance With Enhanced Intermediate/Near Based on Mean Photopic Binocular BCDVA of Patients With Bilateral Eyhance IOLs Corrected to Plano Sphere. | 0.03 logMAR | Standard Deviation 0.04 |
| Distance With Enhanced Intermediate/Near Visual Acuity Group | Comparison of Two Groups Categorized by Distance With Minimal Intermediate and Distance With Enhanced Intermediate/Near Based on Mean Photopic Binocular BCDVA of Patients With Bilateral Eyhance IOLs Corrected to Plano Sphere. | 0.01 logMAR | Standard Deviation 0.02 |
Comparison of Two Groups Categorized by Distance With Minimal Intermediate and Distance With Enhanced Intermediate/Near Based on Mean Photopic Binocular DCIVA (at 66 cm) of Patients With Bilateral Eyhance IOLs Corrected to Plano Sphere.
To compare two groups categorized by distance with minimal intermediate and distance with enhanced intermediate/near based on mean photopic binocular DCIVA (66 cm) of patients with bilateral Eyhance IOLs targeted corrected at plano sphere.
Time frame: 1 day (between a minimum of 3 weeks postoperative up to 26 weeks post-operative)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Distance With Minimal Intermediate Visual Acuity Group | Comparison of Two Groups Categorized by Distance With Minimal Intermediate and Distance With Enhanced Intermediate/Near Based on Mean Photopic Binocular DCIVA (at 66 cm) of Patients With Bilateral Eyhance IOLs Corrected to Plano Sphere. | 0.30 logMAR | Standard Deviation 0.07 |
| Distance With Enhanced Intermediate/Near Visual Acuity Group | Comparison of Two Groups Categorized by Distance With Minimal Intermediate and Distance With Enhanced Intermediate/Near Based on Mean Photopic Binocular DCIVA (at 66 cm) of Patients With Bilateral Eyhance IOLs Corrected to Plano Sphere. | 0.12 logMAR | Standard Deviation 0.07 |
Biometric Data (Anterior Chamber Depth and Axial Length) Between Groups.
To determine if any statistically significant differences in biometric data exists between the two groups that may allow for pre-operative recognition of those patients who could have enhanced benefits of the Eyhance IOL. This will require multiple regression analysis given the large number of variables.
Time frame: 1 day (between a minimum of 3 weeks postoperative up to 26 weeks post-operative)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Distance With Minimal Intermediate Visual Acuity Group | Biometric Data (Anterior Chamber Depth and Axial Length) Between Groups. | Anterior Chamber Depth | 3.25 mm | Standard Deviation 0.32 |
| Distance With Minimal Intermediate Visual Acuity Group | Biometric Data (Anterior Chamber Depth and Axial Length) Between Groups. | Axial Length | 24.33 mm | Standard Deviation 1.36 |
| Distance With Enhanced Intermediate/Near Visual Acuity Group | Biometric Data (Anterior Chamber Depth and Axial Length) Between Groups. | Anterior Chamber Depth | 3.19 mm | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
| Distance With Enhanced Intermediate/Near Visual Acuity Group | Biometric Data (Anterior Chamber Depth and Axial Length) Between Groups. | Axial Length | 24.34 mm | Standard Deviation 1.52 |
Determine if Any Statistically Significant Differences in Pupil Size Exists Between the Two Groups.
To determine if any statistically significant differences in pupil size exists between the two groups that may allow for pre-operative recognition of those patients who could have enhanced benefits of the Eyhance IOL. This will require multiple regression analysis given the large number of variables.
Time frame: 1 day (between a minimum of 3 weeks postoperative up to 26 weeks post-operative)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Distance With Minimal Intermediate Visual Acuity Group | Determine if Any Statistically Significant Differences in Pupil Size Exists Between the Two Groups. | 4.16 mm | Standard Deviation 0.77 |
| Distance With Enhanced Intermediate/Near Visual Acuity Group | Determine if Any Statistically Significant Differences in Pupil Size Exists Between the Two Groups. | 3.64 mm | Standard Deviation 0.77 |
Q Value Between Groups.
Q-value is an assessment of corneal asphericity. * A value of 0 indicates a cornea that is perfectly spherical * A value between -1 and 0 indicates a cornea that is shaped more like a football * A value between 0 and 1 indicates a cornea that is shaped more like a dish
Time frame: 1 day (between a minimum of 3 weeks postoperative up to 26 weeks post-operative)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Distance With Minimal Intermediate Visual Acuity Group | Q Value Between Groups. | -0.34 Q value | Standard Deviation 0.23 |
| Distance With Enhanced Intermediate/Near Visual Acuity Group | Q Value Between Groups. | -0.31 Q value | Standard Deviation 0.18 |
Spherical Aberration Between Groups
Time frame: 1 day (between a minimum of 3 weeks postoperative up to 26 weeks post-operative)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Distance With Minimal Intermediate Visual Acuity Group | Spherical Aberration Between Groups | 0.29 microns (µm) | Standard Deviation 0.16 |
| Distance With Enhanced Intermediate/Near Visual Acuity Group | Spherical Aberration Between Groups | 0.31 microns (µm) | Standard Deviation 0.15 |
Comparison of a Patient Satisfaction Survey Between the Two Groups to Assess for Subjective Differences in Everyday Life. Patient's Answers Will be on a Scale Between Always and Never, Where Never Shows a Better Patient Outcome.
Comparison of a patient satisfaction survey between the two groups to assess for subjective differences in everyday life to determine if the enhanced vision plays a statistically significant difference in patient's perceived quality of vision or quality of life. Patient's answers will be on a scale between always and never, where never shows a better patient outcome.
Time frame: 1 day (between a minimum of 3 weeks postoperative up to 26 weeks post-operative)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Distance With Minimal Intermediate Visual Acuity Group | Comparison of a Patient Satisfaction Survey Between the Two Groups to Assess for Subjective Differences in Everyday Life. Patient's Answers Will be on a Scale Between Always and Never, Where Never Shows a Better Patient Outcome. | Never experiencing glare, halos, or starbursts. | 45 percentage of participants |
| Distance With Minimal Intermediate Visual Acuity Group | Comparison of a Patient Satisfaction Survey Between the Two Groups to Assess for Subjective Differences in Everyday Life. Patient's Answers Will be on a Scale Between Always and Never, Where Never Shows a Better Patient Outcome. | Never using glasses for distance vision | 69 percentage of participants |
| Distance With Minimal Intermediate Visual Acuity Group | Comparison of a Patient Satisfaction Survey Between the Two Groups to Assess for Subjective Differences in Everyday Life. Patient's Answers Will be on a Scale Between Always and Never, Where Never Shows a Better Patient Outcome. | Never using glasses for intermediate vision | 55 percentage of participants |
| Distance With Minimal Intermediate Visual Acuity Group | Comparison of a Patient Satisfaction Survey Between the Two Groups to Assess for Subjective Differences in Everyday Life. Patient's Answers Will be on a Scale Between Always and Never, Where Never Shows a Better Patient Outcome. | Never using glasses for near vision | 24 percentage of participants |
| Distance With Enhanced Intermediate/Near Visual Acuity Group | Comparison of a Patient Satisfaction Survey Between the Two Groups to Assess for Subjective Differences in Everyday Life. Patient's Answers Will be on a Scale Between Always and Never, Where Never Shows a Better Patient Outcome. | Never using glasses for near vision | 30 percentage of participants |
| Distance With Enhanced Intermediate/Near Visual Acuity Group | Comparison of a Patient Satisfaction Survey Between the Two Groups to Assess for Subjective Differences in Everyday Life. Patient's Answers Will be on a Scale Between Always and Never, Where Never Shows a Better Patient Outcome. | Never experiencing glare, halos, or starbursts. | 66 percentage of participants |
| Distance With Enhanced Intermediate/Near Visual Acuity Group | Comparison of a Patient Satisfaction Survey Between the Two Groups to Assess for Subjective Differences in Everyday Life. Patient's Answers Will be on a Scale Between Always and Never, Where Never Shows a Better Patient Outcome. | Never using glasses for intermediate vision | 59 percentage of participants |
| Distance With Enhanced Intermediate/Near Visual Acuity Group | Comparison of a Patient Satisfaction Survey Between the Two Groups to Assess for Subjective Differences in Everyday Life. Patient's Answers Will be on a Scale Between Always and Never, Where Never Shows a Better Patient Outcome. | Never using glasses for distance vision | 84 percentage of participants |