Skip to content

Testing the SNOWDROP Intervention: Using a Clinical Decision Support System and Patient Portal for Falls Prevention Among Older Patients in Primary Care

Seniors Empowered Via Big Data to Joint-manage Their Medication-related Risk of Falling in Primary Care

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05611008
Acronym
SNOWDROP
Enrollment
85
Registered
2022-11-09
Start date
2022-11-21
Completion date
2023-10-30
Last updated
2024-01-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fall, Fall Injury, Fall Patients, Accidental Fall, Deprescribing

Brief summary

Falls are a leading cause of injuries among older patients. Medication use is a major risk factor for falls. Because we lack tools to assess individualized risks, general practitioners (GPs) struggle with fall-related medication management for older patients. Furthermore, these older patients are often not properly equipped to engage in the joint management of their medication. A Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) for GPs and a patient portal for older patients may stimulate shared decision making between GPs and older patients when discussing the medication-related fall risk. The CDSS provides the GP with advice on how to alter medication in such a way that the fall risk decreases, and the patient portal helps the older patient to prepare for a consultation and to engage in the joint management of their medication.

Interventions

DEVICECDSS

A Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) that calculates older patients' personalized fall risk and provides the GP with advice on how to adjust the patient's medication in order to lower the fall risk.

A patient portal that provides general information on falls and fall risk to the older patients and helps the patient to prepare for the consultation by filling out a Question Prompt List (QPL). The QPL is a list of possibly relevant questions and topics from which the patient can select those that are important to him/her. These will already be sent to the GP before the consultation takes place.

Sponsors

University of Amsterdam
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
70 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 70 years or older * High fall risk * Takes at least 1 Fall Risk Increasing Drug (FRID)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Shared decision makingDuring consultationThis concerns the extent to which shared decision making between patient and GP during the consultation. This will be assessed using the Observer OPTION Multiple Chronic Conditions (OPTION-MCC). Consultation are audiotaped and will be coded on shared decision making using this coding scheme.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Website Satisfaction Scale (WSS; patient portal)At baseline & two weeks after consultationThe Website Satisfaction Scale (WSS) measures satisfaction with comprehensibility, satisfaction with attractiveness, and satisfaction with emotional support, in relation to the patient portal.
Patient portal usageAt baseline & two weeks after consultationPatients are asked if they used the patient portal and which components they used.
Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ)Baseline & two weeks after consultationThe Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire measures beliefs about the necessity of medication and concerns about medication.
Netherlands Patient Information Recall Questionnaire (NPIRQ)Two weeks after consultationThe Netherlands Patient Information Recall Questionnaire consists of open questions measuring patients' recall of what was discussed and decided during the consultation.
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM; patient portal)At baseline & two weeks after consultationThe Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) measures the adoption of a new technology/system based on user attitudes in relation to the patient portal.
Changes in medicationBaseline & two weeks after the consultationChanges in prescriptions of the medication as reported in the electronic health record.
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM; CDSS)After the first consultation (study beginning) and after the last consultation (study completion after +/- 7 months)The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) measures the adoption of a new technology/system based on user attitudes in relation to the CDSS to be answered by the GP. This is assessed by measuring Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and Intention to use.
The Website Satisfaction Scale (WSS; CDSS)After the first consultation (study beginning) and after the last consultation (study completion after +/- 7 months)The Website Satisfaction Scale (WSS) measures satisfaction with comprehensibility, satisfaction with attractiveness, and satisfaction with emotional support, in relation to the CDSS to be answered by the GP.
Evaluation of the consultationImmediately after each consultationFour items to assess the consultation to be answered by the GP. The items assess to what extent the patient was representative, their opinion on the communication during the consultation, the extent to which they are satisfied with any decisions made and the difficulty of the consultation.
Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS)Two weeks after consultationThe decisional conflict scale measures decisional conflict after the consultation related to five subscales: feeling informed, uncertainty, values clarity, support, and effective decision making.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026