Skip to content

Education for Prevention and Treatment of Frailty

Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy of an Educational Programme for Prevention and Treatment of Frailty in Older Adults Living in the Community: FRAGSALUD Programme

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05610605
Acronym
FRAGSALUD
Enrollment
235
Registered
2022-11-09
Start date
2022-03-30
Completion date
2023-09-30
Last updated
2025-12-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Frail Elderly Syndrome, Frailty

Keywords

Elderly Persons, Aging, Cost-Efficiency Analysis, Health Education

Brief summary

Frailty is a condition with a high prevalence in older adults, leading to higher vulnerability and increasing the risk of adverse health outcomes and disabilities. The aging of the population in Spain is accelerating quickly, consequently, it is necessary to advise the population on the appropriate path to healthy aging, free of fragility and their secondary problems.

Detailed description

To evaluate the efficacy and efficiency of a Fragsalud program for the prevention and multifactorial treatment of frailty in people over 65 years of age living in the community compared to the usual treatment. Material and methods: A Single blind randomized, two-arm clinical trial; control group and intervention group, multicenter, with 15 months of follow-up, with evaluations blinded at the beginning, and in the follow-up at 12 and 15 months. A recruitment of 196 people over 65 years of age with criteria of pre-frailty or frailty according to Fried's criteria. The Fragsalud education program will be taught in the intervention group; while control group will follow the usual health care. The evolution of the criteria of frailty, cognitive state, eating pattern, emotional state, quality of sleep, perceived social support, quality of life, functional capacity in daily life, adverse results, assessment of self-efficacy and cost-utility analysis variables will be evaluated. Possible confounding factors such as sociodemographic variables, comorbidity and polymedication will be controlled. Intention-to-treat analysis will be performed.

Interventions

OTHERHealth intervention programme: FRAGSALUD

The FRAGSALUD Program consists in two parts, a first part of health education that will be taught in a group in four sessions, and a second part of individual treatment and follow-up, individual consultations will have a bimonthly periodicity until reaching one year, at which time that the program ends and a final evaluation will be carried out to assess whether the changes are maintained 15 months after the start.

Sponsors

University of Malaga
CollaboratorOTHER
Instituto de investigación e innovación biomédica de Cádiz
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Cadiz
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients over 65 years of age who present frailty or pre-frailty, assessed using the Fried criteria adapted to Spanish population; * Patients belonging to Clinical Management Units participating in the study and who will remain in it for the 15 months of the study; * Patients who can come to the Health Center alone or accompanied.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with no full control of their capabilities. * Patients who do not understand Spanish; * Patients with allergies to plastic or metal. * Patients who are instutionalized.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of the Change of Baseline Fried Frailty Criteria at 6 MonthsPreintervention/Postintervention (0 and 6 months)Assessment of frailty using the Fried Frailty Phenotype. This is a five-component measure used to classify frailty status (unintentional weight loss, exhaustion, weakness, slow walking speed, and low physical activity). A score of 1 is assigned for each criterion met, yielding a total score that ranges from 0 to 5. A higher score indicates a worse outcome (greater frailty). 0 = Robust (non-frail) 1-2 = Pre-frail 3-5 = Frail
Evaluation of the Change of Baseline Fried Frailty Criteria at 12 MonthsPreintervention/Retest (0 and 12 months)Assessment of frailty using the Fried Frailty Phenotype. This is a five-component measure used to classify frailty status (unintentional weight loss, exhaustion, weakness, slow walking speed, and low physical activity). A score of 1 is assigned for each criterion met, yielding a total score that ranges from 0 to 5. A higher score indicates a worse outcome (greater frailty). 0 = Robust (non-frail) 1-2 = Pre-frail 3-5 = Frail

Countries

Spain

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control Group
Participants who do not receive attention from the Fragsalud program. The control group follows the usual care and preventive measures in Primary Care, according to different protocols implemented and the criteria of nurses and family doctors responsible for their care.
117
Intervention Group
The FRAGSALUD Programme is a multidomain intervention programme, which covers the prevention and treatment of frailty from different aspects, fundamentally from a physical and cognitive aspect and to maintain social integration, although other modifiable factors that are related to the presence of fragility such as hearing impairment, visual deficit or depression. Health intervention programme: FRAGSALUD: The FRAGSALUD Program consists in two parts, a first part of health education that will be taught in a group in four sessions, and a second part of individual treatment and follow-up, individual consultations will have a bimonthly periodicity until reaching one year, at which time that the program ends and a final evaluation will be carried out to assess whether the changes are maintained 15 months after the start.
118
Total235

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
12-month AssessmentDeath21
12-month AssessmentInstitutionalized21
12-month AssessmentLost to Follow-up14
6-month AssessmentDeath11
6-month AssessmentInstitutionalized12
6-month AssessmentLost to Follow-up200

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl GroupIntervention GroupTotal
Age, Continuous75.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4
73.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
74.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3
Fried's Frailty Criteria2.0 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
2.1 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
2.1 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
117 Participants118 Participants235 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
117 Participants118 Participants235 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
64 Participants95 Participants159 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
53 Participants23 Participants76 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 1172 / 118
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1170 / 118
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1170 / 118

Outcome results

Primary

Evaluation of the Change of Baseline Fried Frailty Criteria at 12 Months

Assessment of frailty using the Fried Frailty Phenotype. This is a five-component measure used to classify frailty status (unintentional weight loss, exhaustion, weakness, slow walking speed, and low physical activity). A score of 1 is assigned for each criterion met, yielding a total score that ranges from 0 to 5. A higher score indicates a worse outcome (greater frailty). 0 = Robust (non-frail) 1-2 = Pre-frail 3-5 = Frail

Time frame: Preintervention/Retest (0 and 12 months)

Population: Older adults (\>65 years) with frailty phenotype.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupEvaluation of the Change of Baseline Fried Frailty Criteria at 12 Months2.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Intervention GroupEvaluation of the Change of Baseline Fried Frailty Criteria at 12 Months1.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Primary

Evaluation of the Change of Baseline Fried Frailty Criteria at 6 Months

Assessment of frailty using the Fried Frailty Phenotype. This is a five-component measure used to classify frailty status (unintentional weight loss, exhaustion, weakness, slow walking speed, and low physical activity). A score of 1 is assigned for each criterion met, yielding a total score that ranges from 0 to 5. A higher score indicates a worse outcome (greater frailty). 0 = Robust (non-frail) 1-2 = Pre-frail 3-5 = Frail

Time frame: Preintervention/Postintervention (0 and 6 months)

Population: Older adults (\>65 years) with frailty phenotype

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupEvaluation of the Change of Baseline Fried Frailty Criteria at 6 Months2.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Intervention GroupEvaluation of the Change of Baseline Fried Frailty Criteria at 6 Months1.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026