Cataract, IOL, Patient Satisfaction
Conditions
Brief summary
The goal of this study is to compare the visual quality and patient preference of the Synergy IOL versus the PanOptix IOL when one of each lens is placed in the same patient.
Interventions
DEVICETECNIS Synergy IOL
Implanted in one eye
DEVICEAcrySof PanOptix Trifocal IOL
Implanted in one eye
Sponsors
Bucci Laser Vision Institute
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Bilateral cataracts for which phacoemulsification extraction and posterior IOL implantation have been planned for both eyes * Desire to mitigate postoperative presbyopia with implantation of Synergy IOL in one eye and PanOptix Trifocal IOL in the opposite eye
Exclusion criteria
* Any vision-limiting problems (e.g., corneal, retinal, infection) which can potentially limit post-operative visual performance * Any ocular condition or trauma that is not resolved, stable, or would compromise the well-being of the subject
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Satisfaction - subjective questionnaire | 3 months to 18 months after cataract surgery | Subjective questionnaire explores the frequency and need for glasses for various visual functions at distance, intermediate, and near and overall satisfaction of visual function without glasses |
| Visual Acuity at Distance | 3 months to 18 months after cataract surgery | Uncorrected and best corrected visual acuities measured at distance |
| Visual Acuity at Intermediate | 3 months to 18 months after cataract surgery | Uncorrected and best corrected visual acuities measured at intermediate |
| Visual Acuity at Near | 3 months to 18 months after cataract surgery | Uncorrected and best corrected visual acuities measured at near |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed