Skip to content

Pharyngeal Airway Dimensions With Twinblock Versus Myobrace Appliances in Developing Skeletal Class II Patients

Cephalometric Changes in Pharyngeal Airway Dimensions After Functional Treatment With Twinblock Versus Myobrace Appliances in Developing Skeletal Class II Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05610150
Enrollment
26
Registered
2022-11-09
Start date
2022-04-01
Completion date
2023-04-30
Last updated
2024-02-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malocclusion, Angle Class II, Division 1

Keywords

Airway, Myobrace, Twinblock

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the pharyngeal airway changes after treatment with Myobrace and after treatment with Twinblock in developing skeletal Class II patients. The main question it aims to answer is: Is the efficacy of the twin-block Vs Myobrace appliances in the improvement of pharyngeal airway dimensions in adolescents having skeletal Class II malocclusion with retrognathic mandible utilizing sagittal pharyngeal airway area measurements.

Interventions

DEVICEMyobrace Functional Appliance

An Appliance for treating growing Class II patients with mandibular deficiency

An Appliance for treating growing Class II patients with mandibular deficiency

Sponsors

Alexandria University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
9 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy children * 9-12 Years * Skeletal Class II with mandibular defeciency and normal maxillary growth depending on clinical diagnosis and confirmed with lateral cephalometric x-reay readings ( ANB angle \>4 and SNA angle \<78)

Exclusion criteria

* Previous Orthodontic treatment * Previous extractions * mandibular shifts * Severe Crowding * Anterior open bite * Any perioral habits

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SNASix monthsAngle formed between points Sella, Nasion and A point and describes anteroposterior position of the maxilla relative to the anterior cranial base.
SNBSix monthsAngle formed between points Sella, Nasion and B point and describes anteroposterior position of the mandible relative to the anterior cranial base.
ANBSix monthsAngle formed between points A, Nasion and B point indicating the skeletal relationship between the maxilla and the mandible.
Witts appraisalSix monthsThe linear distance between the perpendicular projections of points A and B over the functional occlusal plane.
FMASix monthsAngle formed between mandibular plane and Frankfort horizontal plane.
Pharyngeal air way area measurementSix monthsThe upper border of Naso Pharyngeal air way area will be delineated by a line extending from the harmonium (H) to the posterior nasal spine. The lower extent of the NPAA will be traced by marking a line at the tip of the soft palate parallel to the Frankfort horizontal (FH) plane extending to the posterior wall of the pharynx. The OPAA and LPAA are differentiated by a line drawn at the level of the tip of epiglottis parallel to the FH plane to the posterior wall of the pharynx. The lower border of the LPAA is defined as a line drawn parallel to FH plane and passing through the anteroinferior most point (C5AI) of the fifth cervical vertebra. Area will be measured.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026