Skip to content

Comparison of Scores for Early Brain Damage Assessment at Intensive Care Unit Admission After Cardiac Arrest

Comparison of Scores for Early Brain Damage Assessment at Intensive Care Unit Admission After Cardiac Arrest

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05606809
Acronym
AfterROSC2
Enrollment
4500
Registered
2022-11-07
Start date
2022-11-02
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2025-10-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Arrest

Keywords

cardiac arrest, intensive care unit, mechanical ventilation

Brief summary

Even in patients with successful return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), outcome after cardiac arrest remains poor. The overall in-hospital survival rate widely varies both worldwide and across communities, from 1 to 4 folds according to circumstances of arrest and post-resuscitation interventions. Several studies have already shown that early interventions performed after ROSC, such as treatment of the cause, targeted temperature management, optimal hemodynamic management and extra-corporeal life support in selected patients, could improve the outcome in post-cardiac arrest patients. However, the decision process regarding the allocation of these resources, in parallel with the management of patients' proxies, remains a complex challenge for physicians facing these situations. Consequently, several prediction models and scores have been developed in order to stratify the risk of unfavorable outcome and to discriminate the best candidates for post-resuscitation interventions. Overall, several scores exist, but external validation are lacking and direct comparisons are needed to assess relative interest of scoring systems. Indeed, establishing the optimal scoring system is crucial, for optimal treatment allocation and appropriate information to relatives.

Interventions

Early prognosis score will be calculated at intensive care unit admission for each patient based on clinical and biological values as required

Sponsors

AfterROSC
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* all adult patients, major, admitted to intensive care after cardiac arrest (after both in and out-of hospital cardiac arrest), * comatose (defined by Glasgow score ≤ 8) on admission,

Exclusion criteria

* cardiac arrest occurring intra-hospital, * minor patient, * major patient under guardianship, * protected persons, * prior inclusion in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Determination of Area Under Curve of Cerebral Admission Hospital Prognosis (CAHP) Score at intensive care unit admissionIntensive Care Unit Admission (Usually 3 hours after cardiac arrestDetermination of AUC for CAHP score as compare to Utstein style criteria. CAHP score range from 0 to 300 with higher score indicates poorer prognosis

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactJean Baptiste Lascarrou, MD, PhD
jeanbaptiste.lascarrou@chu-nantes.fr+33240087376
Backup ContactAlain Cariou, MD, PhD
alain.cariou@aphp.fr

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026