Skip to content

Efficacy of Repeated Low-level Red-light Therapy in Myopia Control

Efficacy of Repeated Low-level Red-light Therapy in Myopia Control: a Single Arm Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05606237
Enrollment
90
Registered
2022-11-04
Start date
2023-07-14
Completion date
2027-01-14
Last updated
2026-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Keywords

myopia

Brief summary

Low-level red-light technology provides a new and innovative myopia control approach. This strategy enables relatively high energies of light to be delivered at much shorter durations of exposure to induce the myopia control effect. The efficacy of the low-level red-light technology has been proven in a Chinese population. This trial demonstrated that 3-minutes per session twice a day repeated low-level red-light treatment controlled 87.7% of refraction progression and 76.8% of axial length elongation when the time of compliance to the treatment was 75%. Repeating this RCT in culturally diverse groups will confirm and translate this technology into a solution for myopia control globally.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of low level red light therapy in myopia control in African, Hispanic, and Caucasian children. This is a prospective, multi-ethnic, parallel-controlled randomized trial that will enroll myopic children aged 8-13 years old as subjects. On top of wearing single vision spectacles, subjects in the intervention group will receive treatment twice a day from Monday to Friday, with each treatment lasting for 3 minutes at a minimal interval of 4 hours. Subjects in the control group will wear single vision spectacles. The study will evaluate axial elongation, cycloplegic spherical equivalent change, changes in other biological parameters (except axial length), and uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity of the two groups of subjects at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after enrollment. The study plans to conduct an interim analysis at a three-month follow-up. The enrollment target is 90 participants: 30 Hispanic Children (15 control and 15 treatment) , 30 African Children (15 control and 15 treatment), and 30 Caucasian Children (15 control and 15 treatment).

Interventions

DEVICELow-level Red Light Therapy Device

The treatment device used in this study is a semi-conductor laser product (Eyerising International Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia), emitting low-level red-light with a wavelength of 650 ± 10 nm. Based on calculations done by the manufacturer, the device provides light at a power of 2.00 ± 0.50 mW.

Sponsors

University of California, San Francisco
Lead SponsorOTHER
University of Melbourne
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This trial is a single-center, multi-ethnic, single-blind, single arm controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low level red light treatment on myopia among multi-ethnic schoolchildren.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 13 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Provision of consent 2. Non-Chinese Ethnicity 3. Age: ≥8 and ≤13 years at enrollment 4. Myopia: Spherical equivalent refractions (SERs) under cycloplegia: -1.00 to -5.00 diopters (D) 4\) Astigmatism of 2.50 D or less 5) Anisometropia of 1.50 D or less 6) Corrected monocular logMAR visual acuity (VA): 1.0 or better 7) Consent to participate in random allocation of grouping 8) Fluent in English 9) Willing and able to participate in all required activities of the study6) Corrected monocular logMAR visual acuity (VA): 1.0 or better

Exclusion criteria

1. Strabismus and binocular vision abnormalities in either eye 2. Ocular abnormalities in either eye or other systemic abnormalities that affect participate in all required activities of the study. 3. Other reasons, including but not limited to severe physical and cognitive disability, that the physician may consider inappropriate for enrollment 4. Noncompliance with treatment 5. Children whose parents do not sign informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Axial Length (AL) (mm) at Baseline1 monthAxial Length (AL) is characterized as the combination of anterior chamber depth, lens thickness and vitreous chamber depth and measured by results from the IOLMaster. AL will be taken at the 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visits.
Axial Length (AL) (mm) at Month 11 monthAxial Length (AL) is characterized as the combination of anterior chamber depth, lens thickness and vitreous chamber depth and measured by results from the IOLMaster. AL will be taken at the 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visits.
Axial Length (AL) (mm) at Month 33 monthsAxial Length (AL) is characterized as the combination of anterior chamber depth, lens thickness and vitreous chamber depth and measured by results from the IOLMaster. AL will be taken at the 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visits.
Axial Length (AL) (mm) at Month 66 monthsAxial Length (AL) is characterized as the combination of anterior chamber depth, lens thickness and vitreous chamber depth and measured by results from the IOLMaster. AL will be taken at the 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visits.
Axial Length (AL) (mm) at Year 11 YearAxial Length (AL) is characterized as the combination of anterior chamber depth, lens thickness and vitreous chamber depth and measured by results from the IOLMaster. AL will be taken at the 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visits.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTTiffany Chen, MD
Tiffany.A.Chen@ucsf.edu4155143503
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORTiffany Chen, MD

University of California, San Francisco

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026