Skin Laxity
Conditions
Keywords
Periorbital
Brief summary
This is a prospective, multi-center, non-randomized, single-arm study of up to 15 subjects treated with the Renuvion APR System. Subjects will receive treatment with the Renuvion APR System in the lower periorbital area on both sides of the face.
Detailed description
This is a prospective, multi-center, non-randomized, single-arm study of up to 15 subjects treated with the Renuvion APR System. Subjects will receive treatment with the Renuvion APR System in the lower periorbital area on both sides of the face. At baseline, images will be taken utilizing the site's camera system. Baseline images will be used as comparator images for follow-up images for Independent Photographic Reviewer evaluation and subject/investigator assessments. The treatment area will be tumesced with 20 - 25ml of fluid on each side of the periorbital area. The treatment of the periorbital area will be accessed from an incision placed in the crease of the lower lid. Two incisions will be placed in both the medial and lateral crease of the lower lid. Treatment will be performed through one incision and the second incision will be used to allow for adequate venting of helium gas. Care will be taken to undermine the tissue and to ensure the incisions communicate with each other to allow adequate venting. An optional third lower lid incision may be made as needed. The treatment plane will be above the orbicularis muscle. The treatment settings will be 20% Power, 1 LPM, and 3 Passes. Procedure data and adverse events will be captured. Follow-up will occur 1 day, 3 days, 7 days, 30 days, 90 days, and 180 days post-procedure; images will be taken at all visits. Investigator/subjects assessments will be completed at D30, D90, and D180 visits. Subjects may also be seen back for follow-up at the investigator's discretion.
Interventions
DEVICERenuvion APR System
The Renuvion Generator (K192867) is indicated for delivery of radiofrequency energy and/or helium plasma to cut, coagulate and ablate soft tissue during open and laparoscopic surgical procedures. The Renuvion APR Handpiece (K191542) is intended to be used with compatible electrosurgical generators for the delivery of radiofrequency energy and/or helium plasma for cutting, coagulation and ablation of soft tissue during open surgical procedures. Together, the Renuvion Generator and Handpiece are referred to as the Renuvion APR System.
Sponsors
Apyx Medical
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Male or female subjects, ages 18 - 75 years old. * ASA Physical Status Classification System Class I and Class II subjects. * Complaint of skin laxity or lines in the lower eyelid area. * Understands and accepts the obligation not to undergo any other procedures or treatments in the areas to be treated during study participation. * Absence of physical conditions unacceptable to the investigator. * Females of childbearing potential who are sexually active must be willing to use an approved method of birth control during study participation. * Willing and able to comply with protocol requirements, including study-required images/photos, assessments/measurements, and returning for follow-up visits. * Willing to release rights for the use of study photos, including in publication. * Able to read, understand, sign, and date the informed consent. * Able to communicate with the site via video and/or photographs, in the event of a virtual follow-up visit.
Exclusion criteria
* Subjects presenting with ASA Physical Status Classification System Classes III or higher. * Festoons in the periorbital area. * Prior cosmetic/aesthetic fillers (hyaluronic acid, poly-l-lactic acid, calcium hydroxylapatite, et.) in the study treatment area within the past 12 months. * Pregnant, lactating, or plans to become pregnant during study participation. * Known hypersensitivity or allergy to tumescent anesthetic (lidocaine/ epinephrine). * Known hypersensitivity or allergy to ibuprofen or other NSAIDS. * Previous surgery in the study treatment area. * Active systemic or local skin disease that may alter wound healing. * Significant or uncontrolled medical condition that in the opinion of the investigator participation in the study may compromise the patient's health. * History of autoimmune disease (excluding Hashimoto's thyroiditis). * Known susceptibility to keloid formation or hypertrophic scarring. * Cancerous or pre-cancerous lesions in the area to be treated. * Possesses a surgically implanted electronic device (i.e., pacemaker). * Serious mental health illness such as dementia or schizophrenia; psychiatric hospitalization in the past two years. * Participation in any other investigational study within 30 days prior to consent and throughout study participation. * Subject who, in the opinion of the investigator, is not an appropriate candidate for the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Day 180 Number of Participants With Improvement in Lower Eyelid Area as Determined by a Masked, Qualitative Assessment. | 180-Day | Improvement in the lower eyelid area as determined by a masked, qualitative assessment of photographs at 180-days post-treatment compared to baseline by blinded independent reviewers. Improvement will be assessed based on photographs taken at all visits using the site's 2D camera system. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Day 90 Number of Participants With Improvement in the Lower Eyelid Area as Determined by a Masked, Qualitative Assessment. | 90-Day | Improvement in the lower eyelid area as determined by a masked, qualitative assessment of photographs at 90-days post-treatment compared to baseline by blinded independent reviewers. Improvement will be assessed based on photographs taken at all visits using the site's 2D camera system. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Snap-Back Test Grade Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 180 | 180-Day | This test provides relative lower lid laxity. In normal lids, the skin snaps-back to the original position immediately; the longer it takes, the more laxity is present. To perform the snap-back test, pull the lower lid away and down from globe for several seconds and wait to see how long it returns to the original position without the subject blinking. Grade 0 (Normal lid that returns to position immediately on release), Grade I (Approx 2-3 seconds to return to original position), Grade II (4-5 seconds to return to original position), Grade III (\>5 seconds but does return to original position with blinking), Grade IV (never returns to original position and continues to hand down in frank ectropion after the snap-back test). |
| Medical Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 30 | 30-Day | This test provides medial canthal laxity by means of measuring displacement. The greater the distance, the more the laxity. To perform the medial canthal laxity test, pull the lower lid laterally away from the medial canthus and measure displacement of medial punctum. Grade 0 (\<2mm displacement), Grade I (approx 2mm displacement), Grade II (approx 3mm displacement), Grade III (\>3mm displacement), Grade IV (does not return to baseline after release and blinking). |
| Medical Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 90 | 90-Day | This test provides medial canthal laxity by means of measuring displacement. The greater the distance, the more the laxity. To perform the medial canthal laxity test, pull the lower lid laterally away from the medial canthus and measure displacement of medial punctum. Grade 0 (\<2mm displacement), Grade I (approx 2mm displacement), Grade II (approx 3mm displacement), Grade III (\>3mm displacement), Grade IV (does not return to baseline after release and blinking). |
| Medical Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 180 | 180-Day | This test provides medial canthal laxity by means of measuring displacement. The greater the distance, the more the laxity. To perform the medial canthal laxity test, pull the lower lid laterally away from the medial canthus and measure displacement of medial punctum. Grade 0 (\<2mm displacement), Grade I (approx 2mm displacement), Grade II (approx 3mm displacement), Grade III (\>3mm displacement), Grade IV (does not return to baseline after release and blinking). |
| Lateral Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 30 | 30-Day | This test provides lateral canthal laxity by means of measuring displacement. The greater the distance, the more the laxity. To perform the lateral canthal laxity test, pull the lower lid medially away from the lateral canthus and measure displacement of lateral canthal corner. Grade 0 (\<2mm displacement), Grade I (2-4mm displacement), Grade II (4-6mm displacement), Grade III (\>6mm displacement), Grade IV (does not return to baseline after release and blinking). |
| Lateral Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 90 | 90-Day | This test provides lateral canthal laxity by means of measuring displacement. The greater the distance, the more the laxity. To perform the lateral canthal laxity test, pull the lower lid medially away from the lateral canthus and measure displacement of lateral canthal corner. Grade 0 (\<2mm displacement), Grade I (2-4mm displacement), Grade II (4-6mm displacement), Grade III (\>6mm displacement), Grade IV (does not return to baseline after release and blinking). |
| Lateral Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 180 | 180-Day | This test provides lateral canthal laxity by means of measuring displacement. The greater the distance, the more the laxity. To perform the lateral canthal laxity test, pull the lower lid medially away from the lateral canthus and measure displacement of lateral canthal corner. Grade 0 (\<2mm displacement), Grade I (2-4mm displacement), Grade II (4-6mm displacement), Grade III (\>6mm displacement), Grade IV (does not return to baseline after release and blinking). |
| Subject Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | 90-Day | The subject will grade the overall improvement of treatment area as very much improved, much improved, improved, no change, worse, much worse, and very much worse. |
| Snap-Back Test Grade Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 30 | 30-Day | This test provides relative lower lid laxity. In normal lids, the skin snaps-back to the original position immediately; the longer it takes, the more laxity is present. To perform the snap-back test, pull the lower lid away and down from globe for several seconds and wait to see how long it returns to the original position without the subject blinking. Grade 0 (Normal lid that returns to position immediately on release), Grade I (Approx 2-3 seconds to return to original position), Grade II (4-5 seconds to return to original position), Grade III (\>5 seconds but does return to original position with blinking), Grade IV (never returns to original position and continues to hand down in frank ectropion after the snap-back test). |
| Day 180 Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) | 180-Day | At Day 180 Follow-Up visit, the study subjects will be asked to complete a subject satisfaction survey referring to the assessment of baseline photos, current photos, and a hand mirror. Yes/No - did you notice any improvement in your lower eyelid area? If yes, checkbox - improvement in wrinkles, less sagging skin, smother skin texture, other. How would you characterize your satisfaction with the treatment - very satisfied, satisfied, slightly satisfied, neither satisfied or dissatisfied, slightly dissatisfied, dissatisfied, very dissatisfied. Yes/No - would you recommend this treatment to your friends and family members. |
| Average Pain at Procedure Day Reported by Subject | Procedure Day 0 Following Study Treatment (within 60 minutes post procedure) | Study subjects will be asked to complete a 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for the level of pain and discomfort associated with the study procedure. Rating Scale where 0 is No Pain and 10 is Worst Possible Pain |
| Average Pain at Day 1 Reported by Subject | 1-Day | Study subjects will be asked to complete a 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for the level of pain and discomfort associated with the study procedure. Rating Scale where 0 is No Pain and 10 is Worst Possible Pain |
| Average Pain at Day 3 Reported by Subject | 3-Day | Study subjects will be asked to complete a 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for the level of pain and discomfort associated with the study procedure. Rating Scale where 0 is No Pain and 10 is Worst Possible Pain |
| Average Pain at Day 7 Reported by Subject | 7-Day | Study subjects will be asked to complete a 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for the level of pain and discomfort associated with the study procedure. Rating Scale where 0 is No Pain and 10 is Worst Possible Pain |
| Average Pain at Day 30 Reported by Subject | 30-Day | Study subjects will be asked to complete a 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for the level of pain and discomfort associated with the study procedure. Rating Scale where 0 is No Pain and 10 is Worst Possible Pain |
| Average Pain at Day 90 Reported by Subject | 90-Day | Study subjects will be asked to complete a 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for the level of pain and discomfort associated with the study procedure. Rating Scale where 0 is No Pain and 10 is Worst Possible Pain |
| Average Pain at Day 180 Reported by Subject | 180-Day | Study subjects will be asked to complete a 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for the level of pain and discomfort associated with the study procedure. Rating Scale where 0 is No Pain and 10 is Worst Possible Pain |
| Investigator Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | 90-Day | The investigator will grade the overall improvement of treatment area as very much improved, much improved, improved, no change, worse, much worse, and very much worse. |
| Snap-Back Test Grade Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 90 | 90-Day | This test provides relative lower lid laxity. In normal lids, the skin snaps-back to the original position immediately; the longer it takes, the more laxity is present. To perform the snap-back test, pull the lower lid away and down from globe for several seconds and wait to see how long it returns to the original position without the subject blinking. Grade 0 (Normal lid that returns to position immediately on release), Grade I (Approx 2-3 seconds to return to original position), Grade II (4-5 seconds to return to original position), Grade III (\>5 seconds but does return to original position with blinking), Grade IV (never returns to original position and continues to hand down in frank ectropion after the snap-back test). |
Countries
Greece
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Renuvion APR System Treatment Subject will be treated with the Renuvion APR system in the lower eyelid (periorbital) area.
Renuvion APR System: The Renuvion Generator (K192867) is indicated for delivery of radiofrequency energy and/or helium plasma to cut, coagulate and ablate soft tissue during open and laparoscopic surgical procedures. The Renuvion APR Handpiece (K191542) is intended to be used with compatible electrosurgical generators for the delivery of radiofrequency energy and/or helium plasma for cutting, coagulation and ablation of soft tissue during open surgical procedures.
Together, the Renuvion Generator and Handpiece are referred to as the Renuvion APR System. | 16 |
| Total | 16 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Renuvion APR System Treatment |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 48.1 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3 |
| Lateral Canthal Laxity Test Grade Grade 0 | 1 Participants |
| Lateral Canthal Laxity Test Grade Grade I | 14 Participants |
| Lateral Canthal Laxity Test Grade Grade II | 1 Participants |
| Lateral Canthal Laxity Test Grade Grade III | 0 Participants |
| Lateral Canthal Laxity Test Grade Grade IV | 0 Participants |
| Medial Canthal Laxity Test Grade Grace IV | 0 Participants |
| Medial Canthal Laxity Test Grade Grade 0 | 1 Participants |
| Medial Canthal Laxity Test Grade Grade I | 14 Participants |
| Medial Canthal Laxity Test Grade Grade II | 1 Participants |
| Medial Canthal Laxity Test Grade Grade III | 0 Participants |
| NRS for Pain 0 | 16 Participants |
| NRS for Pain 1 | 0 Participants |
| NRS for Pain 10 | 0 Participants |
| NRS for Pain 2 | 0 Participants |
| NRS for Pain 3 | 0 Participants |
| NRS for Pain 4 | 0 Participants |
| NRS for Pain 5 | 0 Participants |
| NRS for Pain 6 | 0 Participants |
| NRS for Pain 7 | 0 Participants |
| NRS for Pain 8 | 0 Participants |
| NRS for Pain 9 | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 16 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Greece | 16 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 13 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 3 Participants |
| Snap-Back Test Grade Grade 0 | 0 Participants |
| Snap-Back Test Grade Grade I | 9 Participants |
| Snap-Back Test Grade Grade II | 3 Participants |
| Snap-Back Test Grade Grade III | 4 Participants |
| Snap-Back Test Grade Grade IV | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 16 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 14 / 16 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 16 |
Outcome results
Primary
Day 180 Number of Participants With Improvement in Lower Eyelid Area as Determined by a Masked, Qualitative Assessment.
Improvement in the lower eyelid area as determined by a masked, qualitative assessment of photographs at 180-days post-treatment compared to baseline by blinded independent reviewers. Improvement will be assessed based on photographs taken at all visits using the site's 2D camera system.
Time frame: 180-Day
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Day 180 Number of Participants With Improvement in Lower Eyelid Area as Determined by a Masked, Qualitative Assessment. | 5 Participants |
Secondary
Day 90 Number of Participants With Improvement in the Lower Eyelid Area as Determined by a Masked, Qualitative Assessment.
Improvement in the lower eyelid area as determined by a masked, qualitative assessment of photographs at 90-days post-treatment compared to baseline by blinded independent reviewers. Improvement will be assessed based on photographs taken at all visits using the site's 2D camera system.
Time frame: 90-Day
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Day 90 Number of Participants With Improvement in the Lower Eyelid Area as Determined by a Masked, Qualitative Assessment. | 8 Participants |
Other Pre-specified
Average Pain at Day 180 Reported by Subject
Study subjects will be asked to complete a 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for the level of pain and discomfort associated with the study procedure. Rating Scale where 0 is No Pain and 10 is Worst Possible Pain
Time frame: 180-Day
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 180 Reported by Subject | 0 | 15 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 180 Reported by Subject | 1 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 180 Reported by Subject | 2 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 180 Reported by Subject | 3 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 180 Reported by Subject | 4 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 180 Reported by Subject | 5 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 180 Reported by Subject | 6 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 180 Reported by Subject | 7 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 180 Reported by Subject | 8 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 180 Reported by Subject | 9 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 180 Reported by Subject | 10 | 0 Participants |
Other Pre-specified
Average Pain at Day 1 Reported by Subject
Study subjects will be asked to complete a 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for the level of pain and discomfort associated with the study procedure. Rating Scale where 0 is No Pain and 10 is Worst Possible Pain
Time frame: 1-Day
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 1 Reported by Subject | 0 | 16 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 1 Reported by Subject | 1 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 1 Reported by Subject | 2 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 1 Reported by Subject | 3 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 1 Reported by Subject | 4 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 1 Reported by Subject | 5 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 1 Reported by Subject | 6 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 1 Reported by Subject | 7 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 1 Reported by Subject | 8 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 1 Reported by Subject | 9 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 1 Reported by Subject | 10 | 0 Participants |
Other Pre-specified
Average Pain at Day 30 Reported by Subject
Study subjects will be asked to complete a 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for the level of pain and discomfort associated with the study procedure. Rating Scale where 0 is No Pain and 10 is Worst Possible Pain
Time frame: 30-Day
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 30 Reported by Subject | 0 | 15 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 30 Reported by Subject | 1 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 30 Reported by Subject | 2 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 30 Reported by Subject | 3 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 30 Reported by Subject | 4 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 30 Reported by Subject | 5 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 30 Reported by Subject | 6 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 30 Reported by Subject | 7 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 30 Reported by Subject | 8 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 30 Reported by Subject | 9 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 30 Reported by Subject | 10 | 0 Participants |
Other Pre-specified
Average Pain at Day 3 Reported by Subject
Study subjects will be asked to complete a 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for the level of pain and discomfort associated with the study procedure. Rating Scale where 0 is No Pain and 10 is Worst Possible Pain
Time frame: 3-Day
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 3 Reported by Subject | 0 | 16 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 3 Reported by Subject | 1 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 3 Reported by Subject | 2 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 3 Reported by Subject | 3 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 3 Reported by Subject | 4 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 3 Reported by Subject | 5 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 3 Reported by Subject | 6 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 3 Reported by Subject | 7 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 3 Reported by Subject | 8 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 3 Reported by Subject | 9 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 3 Reported by Subject | 10 | 0 Participants |
Other Pre-specified
Average Pain at Day 7 Reported by Subject
Study subjects will be asked to complete a 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for the level of pain and discomfort associated with the study procedure. Rating Scale where 0 is No Pain and 10 is Worst Possible Pain
Time frame: 7-Day
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 7 Reported by Subject | 7 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 7 Reported by Subject | 8 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 7 Reported by Subject | 9 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 7 Reported by Subject | 5 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 7 Reported by Subject | 6 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 7 Reported by Subject | 0 | 16 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 7 Reported by Subject | 1 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 7 Reported by Subject | 2 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 7 Reported by Subject | 3 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 7 Reported by Subject | 4 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 7 Reported by Subject | 10 | 0 Participants |
Other Pre-specified
Average Pain at Day 90 Reported by Subject
Study subjects will be asked to complete a 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for the level of pain and discomfort associated with the study procedure. Rating Scale where 0 is No Pain and 10 is Worst Possible Pain
Time frame: 90-Day
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 90 Reported by Subject | 0 | 15 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 90 Reported by Subject | 1 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 90 Reported by Subject | 2 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 90 Reported by Subject | 3 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 90 Reported by Subject | 4 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 90 Reported by Subject | 5 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 90 Reported by Subject | 6 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 90 Reported by Subject | 7 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 90 Reported by Subject | 8 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 90 Reported by Subject | 9 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Day 90 Reported by Subject | 10 | 0 Participants |
Other Pre-specified
Average Pain at Procedure Day Reported by Subject
Study subjects will be asked to complete a 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for the level of pain and discomfort associated with the study procedure. Rating Scale where 0 is No Pain and 10 is Worst Possible Pain
Time frame: Procedure Day 0 Following Study Treatment (within 60 minutes post procedure)
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Procedure Day Reported by Subject | 0 | 16 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Procedure Day Reported by Subject | 1 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Procedure Day Reported by Subject | 2 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Procedure Day Reported by Subject | 3 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Procedure Day Reported by Subject | 4 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Procedure Day Reported by Subject | 5 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Procedure Day Reported by Subject | 6 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Procedure Day Reported by Subject | 7 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Procedure Day Reported by Subject | 8 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Procedure Day Reported by Subject | 9 | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Average Pain at Procedure Day Reported by Subject | 10 | 0 Participants |
Other Pre-specified
Day 180 Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ)
At Day 180 Follow-Up visit, the study subjects will be asked to complete a subject satisfaction survey referring to the assessment of baseline photos, current photos, and a hand mirror. Yes/No - did you notice any improvement in your lower eyelid area? If yes, checkbox - improvement in wrinkles, less sagging skin, smother skin texture, other. How would you characterize your satisfaction with the treatment - very satisfied, satisfied, slightly satisfied, neither satisfied or dissatisfied, slightly dissatisfied, dissatisfied, very dissatisfied. Yes/No - would you recommend this treatment to your friends and family members.
Time frame: 180-Day
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Day 180 Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) | Improvement Noticed | Yes | 15 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Day 180 Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) | Improvement Noticed | No | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Day 180 Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) | Improvement in Wrinkles | Yes | 7 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Day 180 Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) | Improvement in Wrinkles | No | 8 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Day 180 Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) | Less Sagging Skin | Yes | 12 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Day 180 Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) | Less Sagging Skin | No | 3 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Day 180 Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) | Smoother Skin Texture | Yes | 11 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Day 180 Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) | Smoother Skin Texture | No | 4 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Day 180 Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) | Level of Satisfaction (Very Satisfied, Satisfied, Slightly Satisfied) | Yes | 15 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Day 180 Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) | Level of Satisfaction (Very Satisfied, Satisfied, Slightly Satisfied) | No | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Day 180 Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) | Yes, would recommend to friends & family | Yes | 15 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Day 180 Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) | Yes, would recommend to friends & family | No | 0 Participants |
Other Pre-specified
Investigator Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
The investigator will grade the overall improvement of treatment area as very much improved, much improved, improved, no change, worse, much worse, and very much worse.
Time frame: 90-Day
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Investigator Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | Very Much Improved | 15 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Investigator Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | Much Improved | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Investigator Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | Improved | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Investigator Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | No Change | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Investigator Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | Worse | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Investigator Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | Much Worse | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Investigator Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | Very Much Worse | 0 Participants |
Other Pre-specified
Investigator Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
The investigator will grade the overall improvement of treatment area as very much improved, much improved, improved, no change, worse, much worse, and very much worse.
Time frame: 180-Day
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Investigator Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | Very Much Improved | 14 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Investigator Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | Much Improved | 1 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Investigator Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | Improved | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Investigator Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | No Change | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Investigator Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | Worse | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Investigator Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | Much Worse | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Investigator Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | Very Much Worse | 0 Participants |
Other Pre-specified
Lateral Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 180
This test provides lateral canthal laxity by means of measuring displacement. The greater the distance, the more the laxity. To perform the lateral canthal laxity test, pull the lower lid medially away from the lateral canthus and measure displacement of lateral canthal corner. Grade 0 (\<2mm displacement), Grade I (2-4mm displacement), Grade II (4-6mm displacement), Grade III (\>6mm displacement), Grade IV (does not return to baseline after release and blinking).
Time frame: 180-Day
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Lateral Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 180 | Grade 0 | 15 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Lateral Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 180 | Grade I | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Lateral Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 180 | Grade II | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Lateral Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 180 | Grade III | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Lateral Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 180 | Grade IV | 0 Participants |
Other Pre-specified
Lateral Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 30
This test provides lateral canthal laxity by means of measuring displacement. The greater the distance, the more the laxity. To perform the lateral canthal laxity test, pull the lower lid medially away from the lateral canthus and measure displacement of lateral canthal corner. Grade 0 (\<2mm displacement), Grade I (2-4mm displacement), Grade II (4-6mm displacement), Grade III (\>6mm displacement), Grade IV (does not return to baseline after release and blinking).
Time frame: 30-Day
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Lateral Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 30 | Grade 0 | 13 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Lateral Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 30 | Grade I | 2 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Lateral Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 30 | Grade II | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Lateral Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 30 | Grade III | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Lateral Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 30 | Grade IV | 0 Participants |
Other Pre-specified
Lateral Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 90
This test provides lateral canthal laxity by means of measuring displacement. The greater the distance, the more the laxity. To perform the lateral canthal laxity test, pull the lower lid medially away from the lateral canthus and measure displacement of lateral canthal corner. Grade 0 (\<2mm displacement), Grade I (2-4mm displacement), Grade II (4-6mm displacement), Grade III (\>6mm displacement), Grade IV (does not return to baseline after release and blinking).
Time frame: 90-Day
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Lateral Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 90 | Grade 0 | 15 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Lateral Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 90 | Grade I | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Lateral Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 90 | Grade II | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Lateral Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 90 | Grade III | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Lateral Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 90 | Grade IV | 0 Participants |
Other Pre-specified
Medical Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 180
This test provides medial canthal laxity by means of measuring displacement. The greater the distance, the more the laxity. To perform the medial canthal laxity test, pull the lower lid laterally away from the medial canthus and measure displacement of medial punctum. Grade 0 (\<2mm displacement), Grade I (approx 2mm displacement), Grade II (approx 3mm displacement), Grade III (\>3mm displacement), Grade IV (does not return to baseline after release and blinking).
Time frame: 180-Day
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Medical Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 180 | Grade 0 | 15 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Medical Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 180 | Grade I | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Medical Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 180 | Grade II | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Medical Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 180 | Grade III | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Medical Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 180 | Grade IV | 0 Participants |
Other Pre-specified
Medical Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 30
This test provides medial canthal laxity by means of measuring displacement. The greater the distance, the more the laxity. To perform the medial canthal laxity test, pull the lower lid laterally away from the medial canthus and measure displacement of medial punctum. Grade 0 (\<2mm displacement), Grade I (approx 2mm displacement), Grade II (approx 3mm displacement), Grade III (\>3mm displacement), Grade IV (does not return to baseline after release and blinking).
Time frame: 30-Day
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Medical Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 30 | Grade 0 | 13 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Medical Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 30 | Grade I | 2 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Medical Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 30 | Grade II | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Medical Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 30 | Grade III | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Medical Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 30 | Grade IV | 0 Participants |
Other Pre-specified
Medical Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 90
This test provides medial canthal laxity by means of measuring displacement. The greater the distance, the more the laxity. To perform the medial canthal laxity test, pull the lower lid laterally away from the medial canthus and measure displacement of medial punctum. Grade 0 (\<2mm displacement), Grade I (approx 2mm displacement), Grade II (approx 3mm displacement), Grade III (\>3mm displacement), Grade IV (does not return to baseline after release and blinking).
Time frame: 90-Day
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Medical Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 90 | Grade 0 | 15 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Medical Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 90 | Grade I | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Medical Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 90 | Grade II | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Medical Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 90 | Grade III | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Medical Canthal Laxity Test Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 90 | Grade IV | 0 Participants |
Other Pre-specified
Snap-Back Test Grade Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 180
This test provides relative lower lid laxity. In normal lids, the skin snaps-back to the original position immediately; the longer it takes, the more laxity is present. To perform the snap-back test, pull the lower lid away and down from globe for several seconds and wait to see how long it returns to the original position without the subject blinking. Grade 0 (Normal lid that returns to position immediately on release), Grade I (Approx 2-3 seconds to return to original position), Grade II (4-5 seconds to return to original position), Grade III (\>5 seconds but does return to original position with blinking), Grade IV (never returns to original position and continues to hand down in frank ectropion after the snap-back test).
Time frame: 180-Day
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Snap-Back Test Grade Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 180 | Grade IV | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Snap-Back Test Grade Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 180 | Grade 0 | 15 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Snap-Back Test Grade Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 180 | Grade I | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Snap-Back Test Grade Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 180 | Grade II | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Snap-Back Test Grade Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 180 | Grade III | 0 Participants |
Other Pre-specified
Snap-Back Test Grade Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 30
This test provides relative lower lid laxity. In normal lids, the skin snaps-back to the original position immediately; the longer it takes, the more laxity is present. To perform the snap-back test, pull the lower lid away and down from globe for several seconds and wait to see how long it returns to the original position without the subject blinking. Grade 0 (Normal lid that returns to position immediately on release), Grade I (Approx 2-3 seconds to return to original position), Grade II (4-5 seconds to return to original position), Grade III (\>5 seconds but does return to original position with blinking), Grade IV (never returns to original position and continues to hand down in frank ectropion after the snap-back test).
Time frame: 30-Day
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Snap-Back Test Grade Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 30 | Grade 0 | 15 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Snap-Back Test Grade Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 30 | Grade I | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Snap-Back Test Grade Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 30 | Grade II | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Snap-Back Test Grade Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 30 | Grade III | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Snap-Back Test Grade Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 30 | Grade IV | 0 Participants |
Other Pre-specified
Snap-Back Test Grade Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 90
This test provides relative lower lid laxity. In normal lids, the skin snaps-back to the original position immediately; the longer it takes, the more laxity is present. To perform the snap-back test, pull the lower lid away and down from globe for several seconds and wait to see how long it returns to the original position without the subject blinking. Grade 0 (Normal lid that returns to position immediately on release), Grade I (Approx 2-3 seconds to return to original position), Grade II (4-5 seconds to return to original position), Grade III (\>5 seconds but does return to original position with blinking), Grade IV (never returns to original position and continues to hand down in frank ectropion after the snap-back test).
Time frame: 90-Day
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Snap-Back Test Grade Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 90 | Grade 0 | 15 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Snap-Back Test Grade Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 90 | Grade I | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Snap-Back Test Grade Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 90 | Grade II | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Snap-Back Test Grade Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 90 | Grade III | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Snap-Back Test Grade Analysis of Change From Baseline to Day 90 | Grade IV | 0 Participants |
Other Pre-specified
Subject Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
The subject will grade the overall improvement of treatment area as very much improved, much improved, improved, no change, worse, much worse, and very much worse.
Time frame: 180-Day
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Subject Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | Very Much Improved | 10 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Subject Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | Much Improved | 5 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Subject Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | Improved | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Subject Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | No Change | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Subject Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | Worse | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Subject Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | Much Worse | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Subject Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | Very Much Worse | 0 Participants |
Other Pre-specified
Subject Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
The subject will grade the overall improvement of treatment area as very much improved, much improved, improved, no change, worse, much worse, and very much worse.
Time frame: 90-Day
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Subject Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | Very Much Improved | 14 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Subject Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | Much Improved | 1 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Subject Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | Improved | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Subject Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | No Change | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Subject Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | Worse | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Subject Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | Much Worse | 0 Participants |
| Renuvion APR System Treatment | Subject Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | Very Much Worse | 0 Participants |