Skip to content

Translation of the International Consensus Definition of LARS Into a Bowl Dysfunction Severity Scoring Tool (New LARS Score)

A Qualitative Research Study Using Patient Focus Groups to Translate International Consensus Definition of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) Into a Bowel Dysfunction Severity Scoring Tool.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05605600
Enrollment
8
Registered
2022-11-04
Start date
2022-10-03
Completion date
2023-03-31
Last updated
2023-04-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Anterior Resection Syndrome

Keywords

Qualitative Research, Patient-Reported Outcome Measures, Colorectal Cancer, Bowel Dysfunction

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to develop a new severity scoring tool for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) drawing on the international consensus criteria for LARS as well as opinions of patients with lived-experience of LARS.

Detailed description

Six out of ten patients have significant bowel problems in the first 12 months after surgery to remove their rectum (last bit of bowel), with as many as 4 out of 10 having longer term issues. This is an operation which is most commonly performed to treat bowel cancer. Bowel problems can include having to rush to the toilet, having accidents or leakage into the underwear or difficulty fully emptying the bowels. This condition is called Low Anterior Resection Syndrome, or 'LARS' for short. The definition of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome was developed in 2020 with patient involvement throughout the process so it accurately captures the real-world experience of LARS. This definition is to be used to create a new scoring system to measure the severity of LARS. The aim of this study is to transform this new definition into a scoring tool which can be used to assess the severity of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome and investigate how well various treatments work for LARS. It is vital to have patients involved throughout this work to ensure that the new score gives an accurate picture of the severity of these symptoms.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University of Auckland, New Zealand
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Aarhus
CollaboratorOTHER
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 18 years or older * Able and willing to provide informed consent * Undergone an anterior resection for cancer, with current bowel continuity

Exclusion criteria

* Currently undergoing adjuvant therapy * Recurrent or metastatic disease * Unable to participate to complete study procedures (Due to intellectual or cognitive impairment; Due to insufficient English-language skills (oral and written))

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Development of LARS Severity tool6 monthsQualitative research methods will be used develop the new tool. A patient focus group will be conducted to review the draft questionnaire and refine question and response wordings.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gain patient opinion on new scoring tool name6 monthsFocus groups will be asked to rank proposed tool names from 'least favoured' to 'most favoured'. This will be considered along with clinical opinion to derive final tool name.
Commence initial psychometric evaluation of the New LARS score6 monthsParticipants will be asked to complete the new LARS score tool, along with existing LARS tool to test proposed question set and administration method as well as comparability to existing tool.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026