Skip to content

The Effect on Envelope of Motion in Asymptomatic Bruxers

The Effect on Envelope of Motion in Asymptomatic Bruxers - A Double Blinded Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05604729
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-11-03
Start date
2023-09-01
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2023-05-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bruxism, Tooth Wear

Brief summary

Investigating the effect of botulinum neurotoxin on the jaw-neck envelope of motion.

Detailed description

Research subjects will be allocated to placebo or botulinum neurotoxin intervention. A control group will not receive any intervention. The intervention will be administered at three separate sessions with 12 weeks in between. Prior to intervention, and 6 months after last intervention the jaw-neck envelope of motion will be studied using 3D optoelectronic recording systems.

Interventions

DRUGBotulinum toxin type A

Botulinum Neurotoxin type A

DRUGPlacebo

Saline solution

Sponsors

Umeå University
CollaboratorOTHER
Region Västerbotten
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Computerised randomisation, colour coded intervention.

Intervention model description

Double blinded

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

• Tooth wear into dentin.

Exclusion criteria

* No temporomandibular pathology. * No drugs affecting the central nervous system. * No conditions affecting muscles or central nervous system.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of range of motionBaseline and 6 months after last intervention. Measurements compared to baseline values.Measured on a cartesian plane in millimeters.
Change of envelope of motionBaseline and 6 months after last intervention. Measurements compared to baseline values.Volume of envelope of motion measured in cubic millimeters.
Change of length in chewing cyclesBaseline and 6 months after last intervention. Measurements compared to baseline values.Repetitive chewing cycles, measured in milliseconds.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of muscle thicknessBaseline and 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after last intervention. Measurements compared to baseline values.Masseter muscle thickness measured through ultrasonography
Change of maximal voluntary bite forceBaseline and 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after last intervention. Measurements compared to baseline values.Measured through a strain gauge meter
Tooth wear, change of hard tissue massBaseline and 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after last intervention. Measurements compared to baseline values.Intraoral scanning. Tooth wear measured in cubic millimeters.

Countries

Sweden

Contacts

Primary ContactMartin Ågren, MScDS
martin.agren@umu.se+46907850000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026