Class II Growth Modification
Conditions
Brief summary
The aim of this study is to compare the treatment results when treating Class II division 1 malocclusion using the Van Beek-Headgear Activator combination (vBHGA) appliance versus using the Andresen activator.
Interventions
DEVICEVan-Beek activator and a headgear
12 patients will receive Van-Beek activator and a headgear
DEVICEAndresen activator
12 patients will receive Andresen activator.
Sponsors
Al-Azhar University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 13 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Class II division 1 indicated by ANB angle value ≥ 4º * Class II division 1 with overjet \> 5mm. * An age range between 8 and 13 years growing patient using cervical vertebral stage assessment (CVS). * No previous orthodontic treatment * No indications or symptoms of periodontal disease in the past or present, as determined by clinical and radiographic examination
Exclusion criteria
* Missing teeth (excluding 3rd molars). * Craniofacial anomalies. * Medical condition or prescription medication that may affect growth. * Lack of compliance whenever documented in the charts.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| treating Class II division 1 malocclusion | at 8 months | rate of mandibular and maxillary growth |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed