Skip to content

The Effect of Pulsed-field and Radiofrequency Ablation on Platelet, Coagulation and Inflammation

The Effect of Pulsed-field and Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation on Platelet Activity, Coagulation and Inflammation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05603637
Enrollment
50
Registered
2022-11-02
Start date
2022-11-01
Completion date
2024-02-01
Last updated
2023-02-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation, radiofrequency ablation, pulsed-field ablation, platelet activity, coagulation

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to compare platelet activation, activation of the coagulation and inflammation cascade during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation using radiofrequency or pulsed-field energy. Patients with atrial fibrillation and standard indication for ablation according to the current guidelines will be randomized to ablation either using radiofrequency of pulsed-field energy. The endpoints will be parameters of platelet activation, activation of coagulation, and changes in inflammatory markers during ablation.

Detailed description

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) , i.e. pulmonary vein isolation, is associated with the activation of platelets, coagulation cascade and inflammatory parameters. Thrombus in the left atrium could arise on sheaths or wires, but the highest risk presents the ablations itself. Radiofrequency ablation leads to immediate endocardial damage that presents strong pro-thrombotic milieu. To avoid thrombus formation on catheters in the left atrium, heparin with target activated clotting time (ACT) of 250-300 is given during the procedure. Newly, pulsed - field ablation has been widely emerged. Since the pulsed-field energy presents substantially different kind of ablation energy, and the mechanism of action differs substantially (no thermal injury, no acute necrosis), also the effect on platelets, coagulation and inflammatory parameters could differ substantially. The investigators therefore initiate a study comparing the effect of radiofrequency and pulsed-field ablation on parameters of platelet activation, coagulation and inflammation during catheter ablation. Patients with AF indicated for catheter ablation according current guidelines will be randomized to radiofrequency or pulsed-field ablation. The procedure will be done using standard approach from one or both femoral veins under moderate analgesia. Using intracardiac echocardiography, and by means of SL1 sheath (Abbott, USA), transseptal puncture will be done. In patients in the radiofrequency arm, Lasso (circular mapping catheter) will be inserted in all four pulmonary veins, and using Smart Touch ablation catheter (Biosense Webster, USA), pulmonary vein isolation will be done with target ablation index of 400 on anterior and superior aspects of pulmonary veins and 350 of the posterior wall of the left atrium. In patients in the pulsed-field arm, SL1 sheath will be replaced by Faradrive sheath (Boston Scientific, USA), and pulmonary vein isolation will be done using Farawave catheter (Boston Scientific, USA). Blood samples will be drawn at the beginning of the procedure from the right atrium (S1), after the transeptal puncture before the ablation from the left atrium (S2), after the ablation when all 4 pulmonary vein are isolated (S3), 24 hours after the procedure before patient discharge (S4), and 3 months after the procedure during follow-up. Platelet activity will be determined using flow cytometry (membrane expression of P-selectin (CD62P) antigen, active part of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (PAC-1), CD 41/61 antigens). Changes in coagulation will be determined by measuring D-dimers and fibrin-monomers. Regarding the inflammatory parameters, plasma concentration of interleukin-6, and membrane activation antigens on leukocytes will be assessed using flow cytometry.

Interventions

PROCEDURECatheter ablation using SmartTouch radiofrequency ablation catheter

Patients will undergo catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation, i.e. pulmonary vein isolation, using radiofrequency energy with SmatTouch ablation catheter (Biosense Webster, USA)

PROCEDURECatheter ablation using Farawave pulsed-field ablation catheter

Patients will undergo catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation, i.e. pulmonary vein isolation, using pulsed-field energy with Farawave ablation catheter (Boston Scientific, USA)

Sponsors

Charles University, Czech Republic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* atrial fibrillation - paroxysmal of persistent

Exclusion criteria

* pregnancy * left atrium \> 60 mm * mechanical valve * known prothrombotic state * rheumatic heart disease * severe valve disease (i.e. mitral insufficiency \> 2, aortic stenosis)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Membrane expression of CD62P3 monthsPlatelet activity determined by activation marker
Membrane expression of PAC-13 monthsPlatelet activity determined by activation marker
Concentration of D-dimers, fibrin-monomers,and voln Willebrand factor3 monthsChanges in the coagulation cascade
Concentration in interleukin-6 and membrane expression of leukocyte activation markers3 monthsCHanges in parameters of inflammation

Countries

Czechia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026