Skip to content

Prostate Cancer Screening With Abbreviated MRI Protocol

ProstaPilot: Prostate Cancer Screening Using MRI With an Abbreviated Protocol

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05603351
Acronym
ProstaPilot
Enrollment
300
Registered
2022-11-02
Start date
2022-05-01
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2022-11-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Keywords

magnetic resonance imaging, biparametric MRI, prostate cancer, PI-RADS, PSA, preventive medicine

Brief summary

Prostate cancer is one of the most common malignancies in the male population with incidence and mortality rates comparable to breast cancer in women, but in contrast, a population screening program that would fulfill all the recommended criteria is not yet available. According to international recommendations, the preventive PSA sampling used in clinical practice is not suitable because of the concurrent detection of clinically insignificant carcinomas in a major proportion of tests. These clinically non-significant cancers make up a significant and increasing proportion with age. Detection of non-significant cancers burdens the health care system and patients with the care that has no positive impact on their health. Current preventive serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing does not distinguish benign hyperplasia and nonsignificant carcinoma from clinically significant cancer. It is therefore not suitable for full-scale screening. According to current guidelines, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is indicated only in patients with an increased risk of cancer for detection or staging after biopsy and is not used for screening. According to recent studies, MRI has detected an increased proportion of significant cancers in the general population compared to screening based on PSA, while fewer clinically insignificant cancers have been detected. In screening, a shorter examination protocol without contrast medium (biparametric MRI) is used with a lower cost per examination, allowing to increase both the number of patients examined and patient comfort. The main objective of the project is to assess the contribution of imaging in the screening of clinically significant prostate cancer and to validate the published results in the Czech population, and extend the screening model by the second round of examinations and additional laboratory markers. The secondary aim is to design a subsequent study with a larger number of participants allowing statistical evaluation, similar to the successful breast cancer screening.

Detailed description

A prospective cross-sectional (with a longitudinal component, 2nd screening round) study evaluating the possibility of using the biparametric MRI protocol technique for screening clinically significant prostate cancer in men from the general population. Tests performed: * Serum PSA * PHI calculation (Prostate Health Index) to be performed only if the PSA values are in the range of 2-10 ng/l * MRI of the prostate (abbreviated biparametric protocol) * Digital rectal examination (DRE) as part of a clinical visit at a urologist in patients with a positive PSA test * Biopsy - if indicated MRI specifications: * Protocol with anatomical T2 sequence and diffusion-weighted images (DWI), according to the standards * Typical complete examination time does not exceed 20 minutes, planned acquisition time less than 15 minutes. * No contrast agent or spasmolytics is injected. Blinding: * Every test evaluator (radiologist/urologist) does not know the results of other tests. · MRI reports entered in the registry obligatorily before the biopsy. * The patient is not informed which test was positive and resulted in an indication for biopsy. * The pathologist does not know the results of MRI or laboratory tests. The sequence of tests: The MRI is assessed with the PI-RADS 2.1 system, each finding is reported on a scale of 1-5. To minimize the detection of non-significant cancers and to reduce the number of biopsies according to the results of the IP1-Prostagram study, a PI-RADS value of 4-5 was chosen as a positive test representation. Consensual double reading by 2 experienced uroradiologists (at least 400 MRI of the prostate read by the beginning of the study). Men with a positive MRI test are planned for a targeted MRI/US fusion and systematic prostate biopsy. Men with a positive blood marker (either PSA, PSAD, or PHI) are planned for a systematic 12 core biopsy. Positive test results are PSA ≥ 3, integrated marker PSAD ≥ 0.15, and PHI ≥ 35. Study participants are invited to repeat the screening tests after 2 years by letter. If they do not respond to a written offer, also by e-mail and SMS. Definition of clinically significant cancer: • ISUP Grade Group ≥ 2.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTmagnetic resonance

biparametric MRI with protocol including anatomical T2 sequence and diffusion-weighted images (DWI), according to the standards

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTserum PSA examination

testing of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in serum

PROCEDUREBiopsy

Men with a positive MR test are planned for a targeted MRI/US fusion and systematic prostate biopsy. Men with a positive blood marker (either PSA, PSAD, or PHI) are planned for a systematic 12 core biopsy. Positive test results are PSA ≥ 3, integrated marker PSAD ≥ 0.15, and PHI ≥ 35.

Sponsors

Masaryk University
CollaboratorOTHER
Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

A prospective cross-sectional (with a longitudinal component, 2nd screening round) study evaluating the possibility of using the abbreviated bpMRI protocol technique for screening clinically significant prostate cancer in men from the general population.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
50 Years to 69 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age 50-69 years * Life expectancy over 10 years * Ability to undergo all planned procedures (without contraindications to MRI or biopsy) * No known prostate cancer or prostate biopsy in the past (interventions for BPH are not a restriction) * No PSA test or prostate MRI in the past 2 years. * No signs of prostatitis or urinary tract infection in the past 6 months. * Signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications to MRI * Hip replacement * Known BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of the importance of the imaging test in the screening of significant prostate cancer in asymptomatic men, compared with PSA screening: Proportion of positive MRI findings2 yearsProportion of positive MRI findings (PI-RADS 4+) in the general population of men aged 50-69 years.
Distribution of PI-RADS scores in the observed cohort.2 yearsDistribution of PI-RADS scores (proportion of individual scores 1-5) in the screened population.
Proportion of positive PI-RADS detections in the cohort of patients indicated for biopsy.2 yearsRatio of significant and non-significant cancers in individual categories of PI-RADS scores in patients indicated for biopsy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient adherence to preventive examination - self-recruitment.2 yearsNumber of participants who contacted the team themselves with a request for testing.
Patient adherence to preventive examination.2 yearsNumber of participants who signed the informed consent and were enrolled in the study.
Evaluation of patient adherence to preventive examination.2 yearsNumber of participants who visited a screening facility.
Feasibility evaluation of a larger-scale study of screening for significant prostate cancer using an imaging modality:2 yearsConcordance rate (%) between radiologists performing MRI scoring.
Evaluation of the financial burden of the study for the future preventive program of prostate cancer screening.2 yearsCosts of individual inclusion and screening tests.
Detection and assessment of potential barriers to patient participation in the study. Assessment of patient adherence to remain in the study throughout the study period.2 yearsNumbers and reasons of participants who did not complete scheduled tests, follow-up examinations, or withdrew informed consent.
Evaluation of patient adherence to preventive examination - completation of planned exams.2 yearsNumber of participants who completed the designated examination.
Evaluation of complications after an interventional procedure (biopsy).2 yearsNumber of complications after biopsy.
Evaluation of patient adherence to preventive examination - active recruitment.2 yearsNumber of participants who agreed to be included in the study through used recruitment strategies.

Countries

Czechia

Contacts

Primary ContactMichal Standara, MD
standara@mou.cz00420 543 136 008
Backup ContactJan Křístek, MD, PhD
jan.kristek@mou.cz00420 605 444 732

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026