Skip to content

Partial Weight Bearing Proximal Femoral Nail Due to Intertrochanteric Fracture.

Comparison of Full-Weight and Partial-Weight-Bearing Patient Groups in Patients Over 65 Years of Age Who Underwent Proximal Femoral Nail Due to Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Femur

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05602155
Acronym
randomized
Enrollment
133
Registered
2022-11-01
Start date
2018-08-01
Completion date
2022-08-30
Last updated
2022-11-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Femur Intertrochanteric Fractures

Keywords

intertrochanteric fracture, elderly fractures, weight bearing

Brief summary

Femur intertrochanteric fractures (FITC) are one of the most common fractures of the lower extremity, caused by osteoporosis, caused by minor trauma in elderly patients. Today, it is successfully treated with proximal femoral nails (PFN) designed in different ways. After surgical fixation with PFN, patients are mobilized by placing full weight, but some complications can be seen due to the patients being osteoporotic. In this study, the investigators planned to investigate the effect of full weight bearing and partial weight bearing on complications, which were not previously described in the literature.

Detailed description

Participants over the age of 60 who underwent PFN with the diagnosis of FITK were randomized (double-blinded consecutive full load on one patient and partial weight on one patient), and mobilized a group with full weight with the help of a walker after surgical fixation, and the other group with the help of a walker to give partial weight (balance). We planned to follow up his treatment prospectively. The compatibility of the groups will be evaluated by comparing the bone mineral density, calcium, alkaline phosphatase, phosphate, vitamin D levels and ages of the patients. Fracture types and post-treatment reduction quality of patients in both groups will be compared. We planned to compare the complication rates, Barthel Index and harris hip scores in the follow-up of the patients.

Interventions

PROCEDUREGroup 1

Even numbered patients will partial weight bearing after treatment,

PROCEDUREGroup 2

patients with odd numbers will walk with full weight bearing after treatment

Sponsors

Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to 95 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients over 65 years of age with intertrochanteric femoral fractures 2. Patients treated with proximal femoral nail 3. Patients able to walk before treatment 4. Patients who can be contacted

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients without regular follow-up for 1 year 2. Patients who do not walk before or after fracture 3. who have a neurological disease 4. Patients with partial hip replacement after fracture 5. Patients who cannot be contacted after treatment 6. Patients who died within 1 year after treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
demographic datasAugust 2018Descriptive statistical data
comparison of groups1 year after surgeryharris hip score: The Turkish version of the Harris hip score with adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha, 0.70) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.91) was used for functional outcomes. It is evaluated with scores ranging from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the better the hip function.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026