Skip to content

Short-term Outcomes of ERAS Protocol in RAME for Esophageal Cancer

Short-term Outcomes of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol in Robotic-assisted McKeown Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05600335
Enrollment
211
Registered
2022-10-31
Start date
2019-01-01
Completion date
2022-03-09
Last updated
2022-11-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Esophageal Cancer Patients

Brief summary

This single-center, retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in perioperative robotic-assisted McKeown esophagectomy (RAME) among esophageal cancer patients.

Interventions

PROCEDUREERAS protocol

Patients with esophageal cancer have undergone RAME using ERAS protocol and conventional management strategy

Sponsors

West China Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. first detected and endoscopically confirmed esophageal cancer; 2. preoperative evaluation showed no distant metastases and suitable for RAME; 3. preoperative clinical stage of I to III;

Exclusion criteria

1. patients had a history of thoracic or abdominal surgery; 2. patients were IV to VI in the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system; 3. patients had other malignancies; 4. patients had missing clinical data

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
incidence of various postoperative complications2019-2022incidence of various postoperative complications characterized by postoperative outcome
time to liquid diet2019-2022time to liquid diet characterized by postoperative outcome
postoperative pain score2019-2022postoperative pain score characterized by postoperative outcome and was scored according to the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) to assess the patient's pain on the first day after surgery.
duration of analgesic pump2019-2022duration of analgesic pump characterized by postoperative outcome
postoperative hospital stay2019-2022postoperative hospital stay characterized by postoperative outcome
ICU length of stay2019-2022ICU length of stay characterized by postoperative outcome
in-hospital mortality2019-2022in-hospital mortality characterized by postoperative outcome
time to first flatus2019-2022time to first flatus characterized by postoperative outcome
time to out-of-bed activity2019-2022time to out-of-bed activity characterized by postoperative outcome

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
preoperative anesthesia time2019-2022preoperative anesthesia time characterized by intraoperative outcome
operation time2019-2022operation time characterized by intraoperative outcome
blood loss2019-2022blood loss characterized by intraoperative outcome
conversion rate2019-2022conversion rate characterized by intraoperative outcome
radicality of surgery2019-2022R0 resection was defined as \> 1mm from all resection margins, R1 resection was defined as microscopic residual tumor, and R2 resection was defined as macroscopic residual tumor
postoperative chest drainage volume2019-2022postoperative chest drainage volume characterized by postoperative outcome

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026