Skip to content

Viewing Strategy Training in Children With (Cerebral) Visual Impairment

Viewing Strategy Training in Children With (Cerebral) Visual Impairment: From Spontaneous Eye Movements to a Structured Viewing Strategy

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05600140
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-10-31
Start date
2024-10-25
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2026-01-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vision Disorders, Vision, Low

Keywords

viewing strategies, (cerebral) visual impairment, visual rehabilitation, reading strategies, visual search strategies

Brief summary

Viewing strategies are strategies used to process visual Information. Many children with visual impairment seem to lack systematic viewing strategies. However, it is unknown how viewing strategies differ between children with normal vision and children with (cerebral) visual impairment. In addition, viewing strategy training is often adopted in clinical practice, but till date there is no scientific evidence about effectiveness of this approach. The current project has two goals: (1) to measure viewing strategies used by children with normal vision, children with ocular visual impairment and children with CVI, and (2) to evaluate whether training viewing strategies results in more efficiënt visual Information processing.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALViewing strategy training

Children receive a visual training of viewing strategies (six weeks, 2 times a week, 30 minutes). During the training, children are instructed to use specific viewing strategies (looking in a structured direction which fits the task at hand, zooming in and out / change of visual selective attentional field, visual discrimination). The verbal instructions and exercises are protocol-based. A textbook is used to describe the reactions of the children during training.

Sponsors

Radboud University, Behavioural Science Institute, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Royal Dutch Visio
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

For the first phase of the study, we aim to include 48 children aged 5-12 years for each group (i.e. normal Vision, ocular visual impairment, cerebral visual impairment). For the second phase of the study 60 children with visual impairment aged 5-9 years will be included (ocular impairment: n=30, cerebral visual impairment: n=30). In the second phase of the project, children receive a visual training of viewing strategies (six weeks, 2 times a week, 30 minutes). During the training, children are instructed to use specific viewing strategies (looking in a structured direction which fits the task at hand, zooming in and out / change of visual selective attentional field, visual discrimination). The verbal instructions and exercises are protocol based. A textbook is used to describe the reactions of the children during training.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

typically developing children with normal vision: * Age 5-12 years * linear distant visual acuity of 0.1 logMAR or better * Verbal IQ above 70 * Absence of developmental disorders or psychiatric problems like ASS or AD(H)D Inclusion criteria for children with ocular visual impairment: * Age 5-12 years * Children with linear distance visual acuity better \<=1.3logMAR and \>0.1 logMAR * Intact central visual field (at least \> 30 degrees) * Children with a verbal IQ above 70 * Absence of developmental disorders or psychiatric problems like ASS or AD(H)D Inclusion criteria for children with cerebral visual impairment: * Age 5-12 years * Linear distance visual acuity \<=0.3 logMAR * Having the diagnosis CVI (verified by ophthalmologists) * Children with a verbal IQ above 70 * Absence of psychiatric problems like ASS or AD(H)D Additional inclusion criterion for study 2 (evaluating training effectiveness): children with (cerebral) visual impairment should have an indication for viewing strategy training. Training should not be indicated if children have no problems performing academic tasks (i.e. when speed and accuracy of visual processing is within the normal range). The age range for study 2 is 5-9 years.

Exclusion criteria

* Children with VI: linear near visual acuity \>1.0 logMAR * Children with visual field defect \< 30 degrees * Children with a verbal IQ below 70 * Children who attended a form of vision training in the past two years * Children with psychiatric problems like ASS or AD(H)D * Auditory impairment or language impairments * Major life events during training

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in average distance between fixation points during conjunction search (EB-VSA) after trainingGroup A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4Average distance between fixation points using Radner reading test and conjunction search
Changes in visual search accuracy after trainingGroup A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4Accuracy during conjunction search
Changes in visual search speed after trainingGroup A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4Speed during conjunction search
Changes in saccade amplitudes during reading and visual search after trainingGroup A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4Saccade amplitudes measured using Radner reading test and conjunction search
Changes in fixation duration during reading and search after trainingGroup A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4Fixation durations measured using Radner reading test and conjunction search
Changes in reading accuracy after viewing strategy trainingGroup A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4Radner reading test
Changes in reading speed after viewing strategy trainingGroup A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4Radner reading test

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in local visual selective attention after trainingGroup A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4TEA-Ch Speurtocht (total number of symbols found in 1 minute)
Changes in global visual selective attention after trainingGroup A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4Gestalt Closure (Kaufman-ABC), number of correct answers
Changes in visual identification speed after trainingGroup A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4'DST-Plaatjes Benoemen', number of pictures correctly named within 1 minute
Changes in WISC-V visual processing speed index (VSI) after trainingGroup A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4WISC-IV visual processing speed index

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Primary ContactBianca Huurneman, PhD
biancahuurneman@visio.org0(031)646944002

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026