Skip to content

CST1-Guided Oral Glucocorticoids Management for CRSwNP

Efficacy of CST1-Guided Oral Glucocorticoid Therapy for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Polyps

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05598411
Acronym
COMPASS
Enrollment
90
Registered
2022-10-28
Start date
2022-10-17
Completion date
2025-11-01
Last updated
2022-10-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps, Glucocorticoids

Brief summary

Topical and systemic steroids constitute the first choice in medical treatment for nasal polyps. Glucocorticoids sensitivity is significantly correlated with CST1 in nasal secretions. The goal of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial is to clarify the efficacy of a short course of CST1-guided oral glucocorticoids therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Subjects were randomized to receive either oral glucocorticoids or oral placebo for 2 weeks. Endoscopic polyp score, Total Nasal Symptom Score(TNSS), SNOT-22 score, Cystatin 1 and other biomarkers were evaluated before and after the treatment. Researchers will compare oral glucocorticoids group and oral placebo group to test CST1 predictive model of glucocorticoid therapy for Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Polyps.

Interventions

methylprednisolone 24mg qd, 2-week duration

DRUGOral placebo

oral placebo 24mg qd, 2-week duration

Sponsors

Beijing Tongren Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 18-70 years old; 2. All meet the diagnostic criteria of CRSwNP in EPOS2020; 3. Investigator-assessed endoscopic bilateral Nasal Polyp Size Score (NPSS) was greater than or equal to 4 (minimum score of 2 per nasal cavity); 4. Patients with asthma were in a stable state, with FEV1 \> 50% of the predicted value or 50% of the optimal value of personal FEV1; (5) Good compliance, able to complete clinical observation.

Exclusion criteria

1. Medication history of oral glucocorticoids within 3 months before enrollment, antibiotics within 2 weeks; 2. Oral glucocorticoid contraindications, such as diabetes, femoral head necrosis, gastric ulcer, etc.; 3. Any nasal and/or sinus surgery within 3 months before enrollment; 4. Patients have conditions or comorbidities that may preclude evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint, such as: unilateral posterior nasal polyp of maxillary sinus, acute rhinitis, nasal infection or upper respiratory tract at the screening period or within 2 weeks before the screening period infection, acute asthma attack within 4 weeks, current drug-induced rhinitis, allergic fungal sinusitis (AFRS), benign or malignant tumor of nasal cavity; 5. Important clinical comorbidities that may interfere with clinical effectiveness, including but not limited to: active upper or lower respiratory tract infection, cystic fibrosis, eosinophilic granuloma with polyvasculitis (Churg-Strauss syndrome), granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's granulomatosis), Young's syndrome, etc.; 6. Accompanying serious diseases or recurrent chronic diseases with poor systemic control, such as (but not limited to), active infection, cardiovascular disease, tuberculosis or other pathogen infection, diabetes, autoimmune disease, HIV, hepatitis B, Hepatitis C or parasitic diseases, malignant tumors, etc.; 7. Subjects with severe liver and kidney function injury; such as, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \>2 times the upper limit of normal, serum creatinine \> the upper limit of normal value; 8. Known or suspected immunosuppression, including a history of invasive opportunistic infections (such as tuberculosis, histoplasmosis, listeriosis, coccidioidomycosis, pulmonary cysts, aspergillosis), even if the infection has subsided; 9. Women who were pregnant or planned to become pregnant during the study, or who were breastfeeding; 10. Subjects who were fertile but were reluctant to use medically approved and effective contraception; 11. Those with a history of alcohol or drug abuse; 12. Those who believed the patient had other medical or non-medical conditions that were not suitable for the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The change in endoscopic polyp scoreBaseline, week 2, week 6, week 10, week 14, week 18, week 22, week 26Bilateral polyp volume size described using the Nasal Polyp Size Score (NPSS) score. (0 - 4 points per side: 0 = no polyp; 1 = small polyp in the middle meatus, not reaching the inferior border of the middle turbinate; 2 = small polyp in the middle meatus, reaching the inferior border of the middle turbinate; 3 = large polyp protruding from the middle meatus, not reaching the inferior border of the inferior turbinate; 4 = large polyp that almost causes most or complete obstruction of the nasal cavity.)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The change in Total Nasal Symptom Score(TNSS)Baseline, week 2, week 6, week 10, week 14, week 18, week 22, week 26Total Nasal Symptom Score was are graded on a 3-point scale. (0= no symptoms; 1= mild symptoms; 2= moderate symptoms; 3= severe symptoms).
The change in SNOT-22 scoreBaseline, week 2, week 6, week 10, week 14, week 18, week 22, week 26The 22-item Sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT-22) was used to evaluate the changes in symptoms of patients. According to the severity of symptoms caused by RCRS, each item was divided into 6 levels: no distress (0 points), mild distress (1 point), mild distress (2 points) ), moderate distress (3 points), severe distress (4 points), very severe distress (5 points). The higher the score, the more severe the symptoms, and the final total score of the item is counted.
The change in asthma ACQ ScoreBaseline, week 2, week 6, week 10, week 14, week 18, week 22, week 26For patients with asthma, we assessed the change of asthma symptoms through the Asthma Control Questionnaire(ACQ). Each question was scored on a scale of 0 to 6 according to the severity. The result score of each item was averaged. A score of \<0.75 indicated that the asthma had been completely controlled; a score of 0.75-1.5 indicates well-controlled asthma; a score of \>1.5 indicates that asthma is not controlled.
The change of CST1Baseline, week 2, week 6, week 10, week 14, week 18, week 22, week 26The change of Cystatin 1
The change of biomarkerBaseline, week 2, week 6, week 10, week 14, week 18, week 22, week 26Changes in expression levels of biomarker in nasal brush exfoliated cells, nasal secretions and nasal microbes.
The change in AE / SAE recordingBaseline, week 2, week 6, week 10, week 14, week 18, week 22, week 26Any adverse event
The needs of upgrading treatmentBaseline, week 2, week 6, week 10, week 14, week 18, week 22, week 26The needs of upgrading treatment includes surgery, oral glucocorticoids or monoclonal antibodies treatment.
The change of inflammatory cellBaseline, week 2, week 26The change of inflammatory cell in nasal polyps

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactLou Zhang
dr.luozhang@139.com+86-13910830399

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026