Skip to content

Assessment of Different Equations to Accurately Calculate LDL Cholesterol

LDL Cholesterol: Friedewald, Always the Best Option to Evaluate LDL cholesteRol Concentration in norMal and Dyslipidemic sUbjects, in Fasting and Pot-prandiaL State?

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05598216
Acronym
LDL FORMULA
Enrollment
160000
Registered
2022-10-28
Start date
2014-11-01
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2022-10-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dyslipidemias, Lipid Disorder

Keywords

LDL cholesterol, equation, postprandial, Dyslipidemia

Brief summary

Purpose The LDL-C is a very important marker of the lipid panel which allows the introduction of a treatment and then the follow-up to prevent the cardiovascular risk. Friedewald et al have established the most widely used equation at the present time. However, it has many well-known limitations, as being false in postprandial period. New equations have been developed recently. Our work consisted in the assessment of the accuracy of Friedewald, Sampson and Martin-Hopkins equations and evaluated the consequences in terms of misclassification. Given that European recommendations allow the realization of lipid profiles in postprandial period, we studied the accuracy of these equations in non-fasting state . Method The LDL cholesterol concentrations will be calculated using at least three different equations (Friedewald, Sampson, Martin-Hopkins). Results will be compared between equations and between calculated and measured concentrations determined using an ultracentrifugation method. The study is conducted out according to The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) and obtained the agreement of the Scientific and Ethics Committee of the Hospices Civils de Lyon (LDL EQUATION CNIL 21\_488) Hypothesis To evaluate the most accurate equation in different conditions: * Fasting and non-fasting state * In subjects with normal or dyslipidemic lipid profile To evaluate the clinical impact on risk re-classification and lipid treatment goals if LDL-c is calculated using the best equation instead of the Friedewald's.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTno intervention, Serum LDL cholesterol calculation

The serum LDL cholesterol concentrations will be calculated using at least three different equations (Friedewald, Sampson, Martin-Hopkins)

Sponsors

Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* lipid profile performed in the location 1 during the recruitment period

Exclusion criteria

* Results outside the first and 99th percentile for TG parameters * Samples slightly opalescent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of the most accurate equation to calculate LDL cholesterol (mmo/L or g/L)The outcome measure will be assessed through study completion, an average of 1 yearThe outcome measure is LDL cholesterol concentration (mmol/l or g/L) determined using different equations (Friedwald, Martin Hopkins, Sampson equations, …) and measured.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026