Evaluating tDCS Brain-stimulation in Depression Using MRI

Major Depressive Disorder

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), MRI, Major Depression

Patients, physicians, and those who fund depression research are keenly interested in depression treatments that do not involve taking medications. One promising candidate treatment is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a low-cost technique that involves placing electrodes on specific scalp locations and using a 9-volt battery to cause a small amount of electricity to pass through parts of the brain. Depending on the direction of electrical flow, tDCS can make brain cells (neurons) more likely or less likely to generate their own electrical signals. When evaluated as a treatment, tDCS is typically done in daily sessions over a period of two weeks. One of the challenges of tDCS is to work out the best possible positioning of electrodes and direction of electricity flow to gradually cause lasting changes in brain activity in ways that might be expected to improve depression. To address this challenge, the investigators are using MRI to take pictures of the brain during tDCS. This data will help us better understand the short-term effects of tDCS in depression and help us learn how to customize future treatments to cause a lasting beneficial response. Patients with depression between the ages of 20-55 years are eligible to take part in this research. Potential participants will undergo: 1. An assessment to confirm eligibility. This will take place over a secure videoconference call lasting no more than 3 hours. 2. Two in-person study visits lasting 30 min and 2-1/2 hours respectively. In the first visit, the investigators will use the MRI to take a picture of the brain and head structure to determine appropriate locations for placing the tDCS electrodes at the start of the second visit. Following electrode placement, an MRI scan will be performed to take pictures of the brain during tDCS. Depending on the study arm, 1. Participants may receive 'active' or 'sham' tDCS. The 'sham' condition is identical to the 'active' tDCS in every way except that it involves minimal tDCS and is designed to help rule out effects unrelated to the administered tDCS electricity. 2. Participants may also be asked to perform a mental task during MRI. All participants will be compensated $150 + parking upon completion of all study-visits.

Depression is characterized by disruption in the regulation of emotion and mood. Converging evidence from multiple brain imaging studies indicates that depression is associated with dysfunction in the top-down, emotion-regulating frontoparietal brain regions that include the hypoactive left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) brain region and the hyperactive right DLPFC. Dysfunction in additional brain regions including the cingulate cortex, hippocampus and amygdala has also been linked to depressive symptoms. Together, these brain regions form the dorso-fronto-limbic brain network, and beneficial modulation of this specific network has been hypothesized to improve depressive symptoms. Network modulation is feasible using a wide range of brain stimulation techniques, including transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). The latter technique has recently received high interest in the context of moderate depression due to its demonstrated safety, low-cost and non-invasive nature. A typical tDCS setup consists of non-invasive electrodes placed on the scalp to administer tolerable electric currents at specific brain targets. The administered electric current has been shown to modulate brain activity depending on the direction of the applied electricity, with anodal tDCS increasing neuronal activity at the brain-target, and cathodal tDCS decreasing activity at the targeted brain region. Consequently, tDCS setups in depression have typically targeted the aforementioned hypoactive left DLPFC using anodal tDCS and/or the hyperactive right DLPFC using cathodal tDCS. However, the downstream effects of tDCS on the dorso-fronto-limbic network are not fully understood. Understanding the engagement of this depression-relevant brain network by tDCS could provide important insights into optimizing tDCS setups for antidepressant applications. Consequently, the current study is proposing to use MRI techniques to map and investigate network engagement by tDCS in depression, as described below. Note that while Study arm 1 will use data from an existing study, arms 2-4 will involve recruitment of depressed participants de-novo. 1. Study arm 1 will investigate the engagement of the dorso-fronto-limbic brain network in depression when 'active' or 'sham' anodal tDCS is administered at the left DLPFC brain region at rest. 'Sham' tDCS provides a control condition to facilitate the measurement of tDCS-specific effects, and besides involving minimal electricity, is designed to be identical to 'active' tDCS in every other way (e.g. electrode placement, etc.). For this arm, de-identified data from an ongoing clinical trial in depression with separate aims will be acquired for analysis (NCT04507243, N=48 participants, randomized to 24 'active' and 24 'sham' groups). 2. Study arm 2 will investigate network engagement when anodal tDCS is administered at the left DLPFC brain region during the performance of a mental task (2-back working memory). N=24 subjects will be enrolled using a single group experimental design incorporating a within-session control condition (instead of a separate 'sham' group as in Arm 1). Participation will involve one assessment over a secure videoconference call to confirm eligibility (lasting no more than 3 hours), and two in-person study visits (lasting 30 min and 2.5 hours respectively). Both in-person visits will involve MRI's: the first visit's MRI scans will help determine tDCS electrode positioning for the second visit, and the second visit's MRI scans will help us map changes in brain activity and connectivity during tDCS. 3. Study arms 3 and 4 will investigate network engagement during right DLPFC cathodal tDCS. N=48 participants will be recruited for arm 3 (randomized to 24 'active' and 24 'sham') and N=24 participants will be recruited for arm 4. In all other respects, study arms 3 and 4 will be identical to study arms 1 and 2 respectively.

No related papers found yet.

United States