Hiv
Conditions
Brief summary
Key populations at risk of HIV (including men who have sex with men, people who inject drugs, transgender women, and female sex workers) are more likely to be infected with HIV but less likely than members of the general population to know of their HIV status, receive HIV prevention counseling, or be linked to HIV care services. Clinician stigma towards these groups remains a potent and persistent driver of these HIV disparities in many places of the world. The investigators propose to incorporate evidence-based stigma reduction tools into a popular teletraining platform for clinicians and pilot test the resulting intervention (Project ECHO® for HIV Prevention and Stigma Reduction) with clinicians in Malaysia, a context wherein clinician stigma and HIV disparities are substantial.
Interventions
online education and clinical skills
education and clinical skills
education, clinical skills and contact
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* practicing general practitioner or family medicine specialist in Malaysia
Exclusion criteria
\-
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility of Intervention | Month 9 Assessment | Measured with Feasibility of Intervention Measure. Theoretical or possible range of scores is 1-5, and actual range was 3.25-5. Higher scores indicate greater feasibility. |
| Stigma Reduction: Stereotypes | Month 9 Assessment | Measured with subscale of Multidimensional HIV-Related Stigma Scale. Theoretical or possible range of scores is 1-5, and actual range was 1-3.44. Higher scores indicate greater stereotypes. |
| Stigma Reduction: Discrimination | Month 9 Assessment | Measured with subscale of Multidimensional HIV-Related Stigma Scale. Theoretical or possible range of scores is 1-5, and actual range was 1-5. Higher scores indicate greater discrimination. |
| Acceptability of Intervention | Month 9 Assessment | Measured with Acceptability of Intervention Measure. Theoretical or possible range of scores is 1-5, and actual range was 3.50-5. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability. |
| Stigma Reduction: Prejudice | Month 9 Assessment | Measured with Feelings Thermometers. Positive/Negative affect is measured on 0-100 point scale, with higher scores indicating more prejudice. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| HIV Prevention Procedures: PrEP Prescriptions | Cumulative over 9 month intervention | Measured with weekly diary of PrEP prescriptions. Number of PrEP prescriptions will be summed over duration of intervention. |
| HIV Prevention Procedures: HIV Testing | Cumulative over 9 month intervention | Measured with weekly diary of HIV tests performed. Number of HIV tests will be summed over duration of intervention. |
Countries
Malaysia
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Advertisements were posted to Malaysian medical groups (i.e., Family Medicine Association, Malaysian Medicine Association, Malaysian Primary Care Network, Doctors Only Bulletin Board System) between May and July 2022.
Pre-assignment details
n=411 individuals accessed the registration link. Of these, n=257 were excluded because they declined to participate in the study, were withdrawn because they provided incomplete registration data or their identity could not be verified, or were waitlisted. Of the remaining individuals, n=26 were allocated to an intervention condition. Individuals who did not receive an intervention withdrew, became non-responsive to communication from the project coordinator, or were waitlisted.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| HIV Connect Participants randomized to this condition will complete HIV Connect, which is an online course developed by the Malaysian Society of HIV Medicine designed to educate primary care physicians in Malaysia about HIV. It consists of a series of modules featuring HIV infectious disease experts who instruct on topics including epidemiology and natural history of HIV, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), sexual history taking and STI testing, and others.
HIV Connect: online education and clinical skills | 26 |
| Project ECHO for HIV Prevention Participants randomized to this condition will receive Project ECHO for HIV Prevention, without added evidence-based stigma reduction tools. Participants will meet with the Project ECHO Hub specialists and their learning community on a bi-weekly basis for 60 minutes over the course of 9 months. Each session will feature a didactic training incorporating standardized procedures for HIV testing, prevention, and/or linkage to care, and patient-case presentation and discussion.
Project ECHO for HIV Prevention: education and clinical skills | 26 |
| Project ECHO for HIV Prevention + Stigma Reduction Participants randomized to this condition will receive the Project ECHO for HIV Prevention intervention with added evidence-based stigma reduction tools. Participants will meet with the Project ECHO Hub specialists and their learning community on a bi-weekly basis for 60 minutes over the course of 9 months. Each session will feature a didactic training incorporating standardized procedures for HIV testing, prevention, and/or linkage to care, and patient-case presentation and discussion.
Project ECHO for HIV Prevention and Stigma Reduction: education, clinical skills and contact | 26 |
| Total | 78 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | HIV Connect | Project ECHO for HIV Prevention | Project ECHO for HIV Prevention + Stigma Reduction | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 37.42 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.37 | 36.50 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.05 | 38.23 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.28 | 37.38 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.02 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Chinese | 16 Participants | 6 Participants | 13 Participants | 35 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Indian | 5 Participants | 6 Participants | 13 Participants | 24 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Malay | 4 Participants | 14 Participants | 10 Participants | 28 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Malaysia | 26 participants | 26 participants | 26 participants | 78 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 13 Participants | 9 Participants | 10 Participants | 32 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 13 Participants | 17 Participants | 16 Participants | 46 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 26 | 0 / 26 | 0 / 26 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 26 | 0 / 26 | 0 / 26 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 26 | 0 / 26 | 0 / 26 |
Outcome results
Acceptability of Intervention
Measured with Acceptability of Intervention Measure. Theoretical or possible range of scores is 1-5, and actual range was 3.50-5. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability.
Time frame: Month 9 Assessment
Population: Two participants in the Project ECHO for HIV Prevention Condition did not complete the month 9 survey
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| HIV Connect | Acceptability of Intervention | 4.22 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.44 |
| Project ECHO for HIV Prevention | Acceptability of Intervention | 4.72 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.39 |
| Project ECHO for HIV Prevention + Stigma Reduction | Acceptability of Intervention | 4.45 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.48 |
Feasibility of Intervention
Measured with Feasibility of Intervention Measure. Theoretical or possible range of scores is 1-5, and actual range was 3.25-5. Higher scores indicate greater feasibility.
Time frame: Month 9 Assessment
Population: Two participants in the Project ECHO for HIV Prevention Condition did not complete the final survey.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| HIV Connect | Feasibility of Intervention | 4.22 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.44 |
| Project ECHO for HIV Prevention | Feasibility of Intervention | 4.62 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.45 |
| Project ECHO for HIV Prevention + Stigma Reduction | Feasibility of Intervention | 4.32 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
Stigma Reduction: Discrimination
Measured with subscale of Multidimensional HIV-Related Stigma Scale. Theoretical or possible range of scores is 1-5, and actual range was 1-5. Higher scores indicate greater discrimination.
Time frame: Month 9 Assessment
Population: Two participants in the Project ECHO for HIV Prevention condition did not complete the final survey.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| HIV Connect | Stigma Reduction: Discrimination | 4.44 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Project ECHO for HIV Prevention | Stigma Reduction: Discrimination | 4.67 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.85 |
| Project ECHO for HIV Prevention + Stigma Reduction | Stigma Reduction: Discrimination | 4.64 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.42 |
Stigma Reduction: Prejudice
Measured with Feelings Thermometers. Positive/Negative affect is measured on 0-100 point scale, with higher scores indicating more prejudice.
Time frame: Month 9 Assessment
Population: Two participants in the Project ECHO for HIV Prevention condition did not complete the final survey.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| HIV Connect | Stigma Reduction: Prejudice | 29.13 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.84 |
| Project ECHO for HIV Prevention | Stigma Reduction: Prejudice | 23.28 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.5 |
| Project ECHO for HIV Prevention + Stigma Reduction | Stigma Reduction: Prejudice | 32.07 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.36 |
Stigma Reduction: Stereotypes
Measured with subscale of Multidimensional HIV-Related Stigma Scale. Theoretical or possible range of scores is 1-5, and actual range was 1-3.44. Higher scores indicate greater stereotypes.
Time frame: Month 9 Assessment
Population: Two participants in the Project ECHO for HIV Prevention condition did not complete the final survey.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| HIV Connect | Stigma Reduction: Stereotypes | 2.55 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Project ECHO for HIV Prevention | Stigma Reduction: Stereotypes | 2.01 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.59 |
| Project ECHO for HIV Prevention + Stigma Reduction | Stigma Reduction: Stereotypes | 2.32 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.69 |
HIV Prevention Procedures: HIV Testing
Measured with weekly diary of HIV tests performed. Number of HIV tests will be summed over duration of intervention.
Time frame: Cumulative over 9 month intervention
Population: Submission of procedures data was inconsistent, with many participants missing submissions in each condition.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| HIV Connect | HIV Prevention Procedures: HIV Testing | 21.54 number of HIV tests | Standard Deviation 45.14 |
| Project ECHO for HIV Prevention | HIV Prevention Procedures: HIV Testing | 2.65 number of HIV tests | Standard Deviation 6.17 |
| Project ECHO for HIV Prevention + Stigma Reduction | HIV Prevention Procedures: HIV Testing | 10.46 number of HIV tests | Standard Deviation 46.24 |
HIV Prevention Procedures: PrEP Prescriptions
Measured with weekly diary of PrEP prescriptions. Number of PrEP prescriptions will be summed over duration of intervention.
Time frame: Cumulative over 9 month intervention
Population: Submission of procedures data was inconsistent, with many participants missing submissions in each condition.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| HIV Connect | HIV Prevention Procedures: PrEP Prescriptions | 2.04 number of PrEP prescriptions | Standard Deviation 8.8 |
| Project ECHO for HIV Prevention | HIV Prevention Procedures: PrEP Prescriptions | 0.07 number of PrEP prescriptions | Standard Deviation 0.27 |
| Project ECHO for HIV Prevention + Stigma Reduction | HIV Prevention Procedures: PrEP Prescriptions | 0.11 number of PrEP prescriptions | Standard Deviation 0.43 |