Eye Diseases, Myopia, Refractive Errors, Retina; Change
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of repeated low-level red-light (RLRL) therapy on the retinal function and structure among myopic teenagers.
Detailed description
Myopia constitutes a major threat to personal health globally for its increased prevalence. Moreover, its dose-related association with irreversible blindness complications such as myopic macular degeneration has been demonstrated. It is crucial to look for effective ways to control myopia in children to reduce risk of myopic pathologies in later life. Repeated low-level red-light (RLRL) therapy is an innovative and non-invasive therapeutic treatment for a variety of eye diseases. A previous randomized clinical trial suggested that RLRL could effectively controlled myopia progression without clinically observable side effects. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of RLRL on the retinal function and structure among myopic teenagers aged 15-16 years. The RLRL therapy will be carried out at school under supervision of the parents according to a standard protocol for the first month and then will be discontinued for 1 month. Detailed functional and structural examinations, including full field electroretinogram, multifocal electroretinogram, microperimetry, visual acuity, intraocular pressure, optical coherence tomography, optical coherence tomography angiography, cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction, and biological parameters will be evaluated at 1 month, 2 months after enrollment.
Interventions
In addition to SVS with power for correcting distance refraction, RLRL will be performed twice per school day with an interval of at least 4 hours, each treatment last 3 minutes.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Age: 15-16 years at enrolment. 2. Myopia: cycloplegic spherical equivalent refractions (SERs) range from -1.00 to -5.00 diopters (D) and astigmatism less than -2.5 D in either eye. 3. Best corrected visual acuity equal to or better than 0.8 in either eye. 4. Normal fundus, or tessellated fundus. 5. Provision of consent and able to participate in all required activities of the study.
Exclusion criteria
1. Secondary myopia, such as a history of retinopathy of prematurity or neonatal problems, or syndromic myopia with a known genetic disease or connective tissue disorders, such as Stickler or Marfan syndrome. 2. Strabismus and binocular vision abnormalities in either eye. 3. Refractive media opacity: corneal opacities, cataract, or implanted intraocular lens, etc. 4. Ocular abnormalities that affect retinal function: macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, retinal detachment, glaucoma, or ocular hypertension, endophthalmitis, uveitis, optic neuropathy, etc. 5. Previous history of refractive surgery, intraocular surgery, laser therapy, and intravitreal injection, etc. 6. Systemic abnormalities: diabetes, hypertension, etc. 7. Drugs therapies with toxicity effect on the retina: hydroxychloroquine, etc. 8. Prior treatment of myopia control in the past three months, drugs, orthokeratology, progressive addition lenses, bifocal lens, etc. 9. Other contraindications, including but not limited to ocular or other systemic abnormalities, that the physician may consider inappropriate for enrolment.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in the amplitudes of waves. | 1 and 2 months | Changes in the amplitudes are characterized as the difference between each follow-up visit and corresponding baseline values which are measured by electroretinogram. |
| Changes in the latency of waves. | 1 and 2 months | Changes in the latency of waves are characterized as the difference between each follow-up visit and corresponding baseline values which are measured by electroretinogram. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in macular integrity | 1 and 2 months | Changes in macular integrity are characterized as the difference between each follow-up visit and corresponding baseline values which are measured by microperimetry. |
| Changes in macular vessel density | 1 and 2 months | Changes in macular vessel density are characterized as the difference between each follow-up visit and corresponding baseline values which are measured by optical coherence tomography angiography. |
| Changes in macular perfusion density | 1 and 2 months | Changes in macular perfusion density are characterized as the difference between each follow-up visit and corresponding baseline values which are measured by optical coherence tomography angiography. |
| Changes in retinal sensitivity | 1 and 2 months | Changes in retinal sensitivity are characterized as the difference between each follow-up visit and corresponding baseline values which are measured by microperimetry. |
| Changes in choroidal vascularity index | 1 and 2 months | Changes in choroidal vascularity index are characterized as the difference between each follow-up visit and corresponding baseline values which are measured by optical coherence tomography. |
| Changes in best corrected visual acuity | 1 and 2 months | Best corrected visual acuity changes are characterized as the difference between each follow up visit and baseline values. An Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart with standard illumination at a distance of 4 meters is used to measure best corrected visual acuity. |
| Changes in chorocapillaris flow defict percentage | 1 and 2 months | Changes in choroidal vascularity index are characterized as the difference between each follow-up visit and corresponding baseline values which are measured by optical coherence tomography angiography. |
| Changes in fixation stability | 1 and 2 months | Changes in fixation stability are characterized as the difference between each follow-up visit and corresponding baseline values which are measured by microperimetry. |
Countries
China