Skip to content

Specific Neurodynamic Exercises on Disability and Neck Pain in Old Women

Effectiveness of Specific Neurodynamic Exercises Compared With Non-specific Exercises on Disability and Neck Pain in Women Older Than 65 Years

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05596019
Acronym
USNP
Enrollment
56
Registered
2022-10-27
Start date
2022-07-16
Completion date
2023-01-20
Last updated
2023-05-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neck Pain

Keywords

exercise, neck pain, neurodynamic, elderly

Brief summary

This is a randomized, parallel, double-blind clinical trial. The main objective is to compare the efficacy of multimodal exercise with specific neurodynamic exercises and multimodal exercise with non-specific exercises in disability and neck pain in women older than 65 years. The intervention in both groups will be carried out for 4 weeks, with three weekly sessions. Two evaluations will be carried out, a pre-intervention evaluation and a post-intervention evaluation. We will assess neck pain, disability, upper limb strength, cervical mobility, cervical pressure pain thresholds, kinesiophobia and catastrophism.

Interventions

PROCEDUREspecific neurodynamic exercises

Specific neurodynamic exercises in women older than 65 years with neck pain

Multimodal and nonspecific exercises in women older than 65 years with neck pain

Sponsors

University of Salamanca
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Single blind masking with blinded assessor.

Intervention model description

Longitudinal prospective, controlled, single-blind study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Women older than 65 years. * Neck pain

Exclusion criteria

* Tumors * Pacemakers * Fibrillations * Cardiac pathology or uncontrolled hypertension * History of severe trauma/recent cervical surgery * Uncontrolled systemic and inflammatory pathologies * Congenital collagen compromise * Presence of difficulties in performing the Initial Evaluation tests * Language barriers * Pending litigation or legal claim

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensityfour weeks.Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) will be used. It is a scale used to quantify the patient's pain level on an 11-point numerical scale 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst possible pain.
Neck disabilityfour weeksThe Neck Disability Index (NDI) will be used. It is a modification of the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index. It is a scale used to measure disability associated with cervical pain due to acute or chronic conditions. He has 10 items: 7 related to activities of daily living, 2 related to pain and 1 related to concentration. The test can be interpreted with a maximum score of 50.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
upper limb strengthfour weeksThe strength in upper limb movements will be recorded with the device wireless MicroFET 2: Hand-held dynamometer for force assessment.
Pressure pain thresholdfour weeksPressure algometry measurements will be performed with a digital algometer to assess pressure pain thresholds. (Algometer model: Pain Test™ FPIX 10).
Cervical range of motionfour weeksThe Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) device (Performance Attainment Associates, USA) will be used to measure the cervical range of motion, including flexion, extension, lateral flexion and rotation.
Catastrophismfour weeksPain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) will be used. People are asked to indicate the degree to which they have the above thoughts and feelings when they are experiencing pain using the 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time) scale. A total score is yielded (ranging from 0-52).
Kinesiophobiafour weeksThe Tampa Scale for kinesiophobia (TSK-13) will be used. It is a patient-reported outcome measure designed to help identify kinesiophobia. This version is a 13-item questionnaire aimed at the assessment of fear of movement/re-injury. Each item is provided with a 4-points Likert scale with scoring alternatives ranging from strongly disagree \[0\] to strongly agree \[4\] . This gives a possible total raw score range from 0 to 52.
Hand grip strengthfour weeksThe strength will be recorded with Jamar Plus: Digital dynamometer to assess grip strength.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026