Skip to content

Flexible vs. Fixed Diuretic Regimen in the Management of Chronic Heart Failure: A Pilot Study

Flexible vs. Fixed Diuretic Regimen in the Management of Chronic Heart Failure: A Pilot Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05594823
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-10-26
Start date
2023-01-03
Completion date
2023-07-31
Last updated
2023-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Diseases, Heart Failure

Keywords

diuretic, furosemide, flexible diuretic regimen, weight-based

Brief summary

Heart failure is a major cause of death and hospitalization in Canada. Many of the symptoms experienced by patients with heart failure relate to having fluid accumulate in the lungs causing difficulty breathing, swelling in the legs, and an increase in weight. Thus, one of the cornerstones of managing heart failure includes the use of medications known as diuretics that target the kidneys to reduce fluid accumulation via urination. Deciding on the correct dose of this medication can be quite nuanced as under-dosing can lead to accumulation of fluid, and over-dosing can dehydrate patients and potentially result in lightheadedness/fainting and damage to the kidneys. Currently, options for prescribing diuretics for heart failure include 1) giving patients a regular, fixed dose or 2) having patients monitor their daily weight as a surrogate of their fluid status and then take a dose of diuretic based on a pre-prepared scale. The rationale behind the flexible weight-based diuretic scale is that it can potentially detect early fluid accumulation and thus possibly prevent hospitalization or ED visits, and it also avoids over-dosing and potentially dehydrating patients. Currently, it is not clear whether the flexible diuretic regimen is better than the fixed-dose regimen in preventing ED visits, hospitalizations, kidney damage, or death and as such, this pilot study will directly compare the two commonly used regimens in the management of chronic heart failure patients.

Interventions

OTHERAmbulatory heart failure management with Flexible Diuretic Regimen with furosemide

Subjects will be given a regimen that determines a variable daily dose of diuretic (furosemide) based on daily self-measured weights as part of the standard of care ambulatory management of chronic heart failure. Follow-up will occur at 90 days with routine bloodwork to monitor renal function.

OTHERAmbulatory heart failure management with fixed dose furosemide

Subjects will be prescribed a fixed daily dose of diuretic (furosemide) as part of the standard of care ambulatory management of chronic heart failure. Follow-up will occur at 90 days with routine bloodwork to monitor renal function.

Sponsors

London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Diagnosis of heart failure, either reduced (Left ventricular ejection fraction \[LVEF\] ≤ 40%) or preserved (LVEF \> 40%) ejection fraction as measured by echocardiography performed within the last 2 months 2. Prescribed and tolerating furosemide with a minimum daily dose of 40mg oral daily 3. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II or higher symptoms 4. NT-proBNP cutoff of ≥ 1000 pg/mL performed within 30 days prior to randomization 5. Age \> 18 years 6. English speaking 7. Access to a scale and ability to weigh themselves daily and reliable telephone access

Exclusion criteria

1. Myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, stent insertion and/or angioplasty within 14 days 2. Pregnancy 3. Inability to follow directions and self-monitor as part of a flexible diuretic regimen as discerned by the clinician 4. Allergic reaction to loop diuretics 5. Unable to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mortality and morbidity composite outcome90 daysTime to first event of a composite outcome including: ambulatory heart failure visit (clinic or emergency department) requiring intravenous diuretic, an increase in oral diuretic dose greater than or equal to 2.5 times their baseline dose prescribed at time of randomization, or the addition of metolazone; hospitalization for heart failure and/or acute kidney injury defined as a serum creatinine \> 1.5 times from baseline at time of randomization; and all-cause death up to 90 days post-randomization

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of acute kidney injury90 daysRate of acute kidney injury defined as a serum creatinine increase of \>1.5 times from baseline at 90 days from randomization
Heart Failure Hospitalizations90 daysTotal number of hospitalizations due to heart failure (first and recurrent) during the 90 days post-randomization
All-cause Hospitalizations90 daysTotal number of hospitalizations for any cause during the 90 days post-randomization

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactStuart Smith, MD
stuart.smith@lhsc.on.ca(519) 663-3428
Backup ContactAndy Jiang, MD
andy.jiang@lhsc.on.ca

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026