Skip to content

The Best Way to Improve the Near Visual Acuity After ZXR00 IOL Implantation

The Best Way to Improve the Near Visual Acuity After Implantation of Tecnis Symfony® ZXR00 Intraocular Lens

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05594537
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-10-26
Start date
2022-11-01
Completion date
2023-01-31
Last updated
2022-10-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cataract, Near Vision

Brief summary

The Best Way to Improve the Near Visual Acuity After ZXR00 IOL Implantation

Detailed description

ZXR00 intraocular lens is a new type of IOL that can achieve good continuous visual acuity. Its characteristic is to improve the distance and intermedia visual acuity and maintain good visual quality while sacrificing the near visual acuity. Previous studies report that there are mainly two ways to improve the near visual acuity of ZXR00:1.Bilateral implantation of ZXR00 with micromonovision. 2. Combined Implantation of ZXR00 and multifocal IOLs.This study aim to explore which is the best way to improve the near visual acuity after ZXR00 IOL implantation.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Yune Zhao
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age of 18-80 years * Cataract surgery is planned * The operation was successful without any complications * Implanted with ZXR00 IOLS or ZMB00 IOLs

Exclusion criteria

* The history of retinopathy or retinal surgery * Irregular corneal astigmatism * Regular corneal astigmatism of 1.00 diopter (D) or more * Iris abnormalities * Macular degeneration * Neuro-ophthalmic disease * The history of ocular inflammation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Uncorrected Visual Acuities2022.12.31Uncorrected monocular and binocular visual acuities (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) at distance (5m), intermediate(66 cm), and near (40 cm).
Corrected Visual Acuities2022.12.31Corrected monocular and binocular visual acuities (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) at distance (5m), intermediate(66 cm), and near (40 cm).
Defocus Curve2022.12.31Corrected monocular and binocular defocus curves were measured from +2.5 D to -4.0 D (in 0.5 D steps).
Patient satisfaction2022.12.31Patient satisfaction was rated on a scale of 1 to 5: 1 = very dissatisfied; 2 = dissatisfied; 3 = neutral; 4 = satisfied; and 5 = very satisfied.
Subjective quality of vision2022.12.31Subjective quality of vision was evaluated using the 14-item Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-14).Each item was scaled according to the degree of difficulty of different activities: 4 points (no difficulty), 3 points (a little difficulty), 2 points (a moderate amount of difficulty), 1 point (a great deal of difficulty), and 0 point (unable to do the activity).overall score is range 0-56.The higher the score, the worse subjective quality of vision.
Adverse visual symptoms2022.12.31Adverse visual symptoms including blurred vision, glare, starbursts, haloes, hazy vision, distortion, focusing diffculties, multiple images, and depth perception diffculty, was evaluated using the Quality of Vision test. This test includes 30 items, with a score between 0 and 3 (overall score range 0-90).The higher the score, the more postoperative adverse visual symptoms.
Stereopsis2022.12.31Stereopsis was evaluated using OCULUS Binoptometer.

Contacts

Primary ContactYune Zhao
zyehzeye@126.com8613819707056
Backup ContactJiayan Fang
1132093186@qq.com8615957793328

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026