Skip to content

Ultrasound-guided IUD Insertion During Family Medicine Residency Training

Ultrasound-guided Intrauterine Device Insertion During Family Medicine Residency

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05594108
Enrollment
40
Registered
2022-10-26
Start date
2020-07-15
Completion date
2024-04-01
Last updated
2024-05-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

IUD Insertion Complication

Brief summary

The objective of this pilot study is to test that hypothesis that ultrasound guided IUD placement by family medicine residents improves patient pain scores, procedure completion time, and procedure complication rates. The secondary objective is to test the hypothesis that ultrasound guided IUD placement improves resident confidence in performing the procedure. A prospective, randomized controlled pilot study will be conducted in the Department of Academic Family Medicine at the University of Saskatchewan. All women undergoing IUD placement (hormonal or non-hormonal) at West Winds Primary Care Center from Mar 1, 2020- Mar 1, 2021 will be invited to participate. Informed consent will be obtained from each patient and the resident inserting the IUD prior to initiating study procedures. The control group will comprise 20 women undergoing non-ultrasound guided IUD placement. The experimental group will comprise 20 women undergoing transabdominal ultrasound guided IUD placement. Patient pain scores and resident confidence scores will be tabulated using likert scales and compared between control and experimental groups using independent sample t-tests. Procedure completion time (minutes) will be compared between groups using t-tests. Procedure complications rates will be categorized as: a) inability to penetrate the cervix, b) improper location, c) inability to release the IUD from the insertion device, d) perforation, e) vasovagal reactions, and f) post-procedure infection; outcomes will be compared between groups using Chi-square analyses.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTultrasonography

transabdominal ultrasonography

Sponsors

University of Saskatchewan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Control group=non ultrasound guided IUD insertion Experimental group=ultrasound guided IUD insertion

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
15 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* all women of pre or perimenopausal age undergoing IUD (hormonal or non-hormonal) placement at West Winds Primary Care Center from Mar1, 2020 to Mar1, 2021

Exclusion criteria

* pregnancy, \< 6 weeks postpartum

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
post procedure pain score3 yearspatient pain, likert scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
procedure completion time3 yearstime to complete IUD insertion, mins
procedure complications3 yearsa) inability to penetrate the cervix, b) improper location, c) inability to release the IUD from the insertion device, d) perforation, e) vasovagal reactions, and f) post-procedure infection
residency confidence with procedure3 yearsfamily medicine resident confidence with inserting IUDs, , likert scale

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026