Periacetabular Tumor
Conditions
Keywords
dislocation, endoprosthetic reconstruction, anteversion angle, pelvis
Brief summary
The purpose of this clinical study is to investigate whether patients who receive modified anteversion angle (( α-15°)±10°) of the acetabular cup have a lower risk of dislocation within one year after surgery, compared to patients who receive conventional anteversion angle ( α±10°) of the acetabular cup. The hypothesis is that patients with placement of the modified (( α-15°)±10°) anteversion angle of the acetabular component will have decreased risk of dislocation 1 year after surgery compared to patients with conventional anteversion angle ( α±10°) placement. PS: α refers to the preoperative anteversion angle of the affected hip. α equals to the anteversion angle of the contralateral limb if it cannot be accurately measured on the affected limb. A standard error within 10° is accepted
Detailed description
Hip dislocation is a common complication in patients who undergo reconstruction surgery after periacetabular tumor resection and most of these cases are anterior dislocations. Studies suggest that this type of dislocation may be closely related to the position and anteversion angle of the acetabular component. Therefore, properly reducing the anteversion angle of the acetabular cup during reconstruction might effectively prevent possible collisions between the cup and the femoral component, thereby reducing the potential risk of dislocation. Based on this theory, we aim to investigate whether patients who receive modified anteversion angle (( α-15°)±10°) of the acetabular cup have a lower risk of dislocation within one year after surgery, compared to patients who receive conventional anteversion angle ( α±10°) of the acetabular cup. PS: α refers to the preoperative anteversion angle of the affected hip. α equals to the anteversion angle of the contralateral limb if it cannot be accurately measured on the affected size. A standard error within 10° is accepted.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALmodified anteversion angle placement(( α-15°)±10°)
Preoperative examination was conducted to determine a safe surgical margin in all patients. A 3D printed osteotomy guide combined with a 3D printed prosthesis pre- designed anteversion angle is assembled for reconstruction after tumor resection. Once completed, intraoperative X-ray fluoroscopy was applied to evaluate the anteversion angle of the acetabular component. If the anteversion angle doesn't meet the predetermined criteria, it needs to be adjusted until it does.
BEHAVIORALconventional anteversion angle placement ( α±10°)
Preoperative examination was conducted to determine a safe surgical margin in all patients. A 3D printed osteotomy guide combined with a 3D printed prosthesis with predesigned anteversion angle is assembled for reconstruction following tumor resection. Once completed, intraoperative X-ray fluoroscopy was applied to evaluate the anteversion angle of the acetabular component. If the anteversion angle doesn't meet the predetermined criteria, it needs to be adjusted until it does.
Sponsors
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Age above 16 years old, gender is not limited. * Tumor involving periacetabulum, femoral head, femoral neck or proximal femur * Patients require 3D-printed hemipelvic endoprosthetic reconstruction following periacetabular tumor resection * The subject has an estimated survival period of at least one year or more. * The subjects with informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* The patient used to conduct surgery on his/her hip joint * The patient's current surgery aimed for hip revision for implant failure or infection * The patient didn't conduct hip endoprosthetic reconstruction * Patients with congenital defects in the gluteal muscle group, neurological function or pelvic tilt deformity severe enough to affect functional activity * Patients cannot self-assess postoperative function after surgery * According to the judgment of the investigator/supervisor, there may be difficulties in completing postoperative follow-up * Subjects have participated in similar research projects
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The endpoint for patient participation will dislocate | followed for 1 years postoperatively for study end points | postoperative hip dislocation |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| MSTS score | followed 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 1 year postoperatively for study endpoints | The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system is a validated and well-accepted functional scoring system used in orthopaedic oncology research |
| TESS score | followed 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 1 year postoperatively for study endpoints | Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) is a physical disability measure developed specifically for patients undergoing surgery for extremity tumours |
| Henderson's failure mode | followed 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 1 year postoperatively for study endpoints | 1: soft tissue failure; 2: aseptic loosening; 3: structural failure; 4: periprosthetic infection; 5: tumor progression |
Countries
China
Contacts
Primary ContactHao Qu, MD
Backup ContactNong Lin, MD
Outcome results
None listed