Skip to content

Effectiveness of Trigger Point Dry Needling on Plantar Fasciitis

Effectiveness of Trigger Point Dry Needling on Plantar Fasciitis: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05588349
Enrollment
20
Registered
2022-10-20
Start date
2023-02-01
Completion date
2023-05-31
Last updated
2023-02-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Plantar Fascitis

Keywords

Plantar fasciitis, Dry needling

Brief summary

Plantar fasciitis could lead to pain, disability and impaired balance. Dry needling that targets myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) has been shown to be beneficial in reducing pain, improving range of motion and function in patients with musculoskeletal conditions. Previous systematic review suggested a positive effect of dry needling on improving pain intensity and pain-related disability in patients with plantar heel pain (Llurda-Almuzara et al., 2021). However, the generalisability of the result is limited by small number of trials and heterogenicity in the dry needling application. Also, there is currently no evidence on its effect on dynamic balance and ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. This randomized controlled trial is designed to investigate the effectiveness of dry needling on pain, pain-related disability, dynamic balance and ankle dorsiflexion range of motion in patients with plantar fasciitis.

Detailed description

Twenty participants aged 18 - 65 years with plantar fasciitis will be recruited and randomized to (1) dry needing and stretching exercise group or (2) stretching exercise group, receiving three treatment sessions over three weeks. The primary outcome measure will be numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) and the secondary outcome measures will be Chinese Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), modified Star Excursion Balance Test (mSEBT) and weight bearing lunge test (WBLT) measured at baseline and week 4.

Interventions

OTHERDry needling

Dry needling + stretching exercise

OTHERStretching exercise

Stretching exercise only

Sponsors

Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Dry needling plus stretching exercise versus stretching exercise alone

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age of 18-65 years * Clinical diagnosis of plantar fasciitis in accordance with the clinical guidelines of the Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) * Pain intensity of a minimum score of 5 on 11-point NPRS * Presence of trigger points of the gastrocnemius or soleus muscles or both * History of plantar heel pain for over 1 month

Exclusion criteria

* Needle allergy or phobia * Bleeding disorders or severe vascular disease * Pregnancy * Cancer * Fracture or surgery in the foot region or leg * Infection * Dermatological disease in the area of needling * History of injection therapy in the heel during the previous three months * Cognitive impairment * Neurological disorders affecting balance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in first-step pain intensityBaseline to 4 weeksThe change in first-step pain intensity will be measured by the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), which is a 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain imaginable).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in pain-related disabilityBaseline to 4 weeksThe change in pain-related disability will be measured by the Chinese Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), which is a 42-item patient-reported outcome measure with a normalized score ranging from 0 to 100. A score of 100 resembling no symptoms and 0 resembling severe symptoms.
Change in dynamic balanceBaseline to 4 weeksThe change in dynamic balance will be measured by the modified Star Excursion Balance Test (mSEBT). Participants stand on the leg to be tested and attempt to reach as far as possible with the reaching foot in 3 directions (anterior, posteromedial and posterolateral). The maximal distance reached along each direction (in centimeters) will be recorded. Greater reaching distance indicates better performance in dynamic balance.
Change in weight bearing ankle dorsiflexion range of motionBaseline to 4 weeksThe change in weight bearing ankle dorsiflexion range of motion will be measured by weight bearing lunge test (WBLT). Participants lunge forward until the knee could only make a slight contact with the wall with the heel remain in contact with the ground. The maximal distance (in centimeters) from the wall to the tip of the great toe is recorded. Greater distance indicates greater ankle dorsiflexion range of motion.

Countries

Hong Kong

Contacts

Primary ContactWong
1155168950@link.cuhk.edu.hk64323868

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026