Skip to content

Effect of Diaphragmatic Release on Upper Crossed Syndrome

Effect of Diaphragmatic Release on Upper Crossed Syndrome

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05586685
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-10-19
Start date
2023-03-20
Completion date
2023-04-20
Last updated
2023-03-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kyphosis, Neck Muscle Issue

Brief summary

the study aims to investigate the effectiveness of diaphragmatic release on upper crossed syndrome

Detailed description

Poor posture typically causes upper cross syndrome, resulting in neck pain. Neck pain is the most common reason for patients to visit healthcare professionals. This syndrome can cause dysfunctional tone in posture and muscular disparity of the head, neck, and shoulder region . Evidence suggests that 6-48% of the upper crossed syndrome population complain of pain in the shoulder girdle and cervicothoracic region. Many disorders are linked with the upper crossed syndrome, including migraine headaches; chronic headaches; Subacromial impingement; biceps tendinitis; thoracic outlet syndrome; degeneration of the cervical spine; and joint dysfunction at the C1-C2 segment, C4-C5 segment, cervicothoracic joint, and T4-T5 segment. Upon the available research studies, there is no study conducted to investigate the effect of diaphragmatic release on upper crossed syndrome patients.

Interventions

OTHEReffect of diaphragmatic release on upper crossed syndrome

The patients will be positioned in the supine position. The therapist stood at the head of the patient.therapist make manual contact of ribs and ask patient to inspire the move ribs laterally and then expire conventional exercise Subjects will form the letter 'Y' with their arms then they will flex their elbows and move into a position of shoulder extension, so that their arms will form the letter 'w L to Y Exercise: Subjects will begin with arms abducted to 90° and elbows flexed to 90° Chin tucks : Subjects will length the neck by pushing the chin into the table in an entirely posterior motion stretch pectoral area from supine lying position

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

the patients and investigator do not know the groups receive treatment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
17 Years to 22 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ranged from 17 to 22 years . * Body Mass Index from 20 to 25 kg/m². * All participants have an intensity of neck pain on VAS (4-8) (moderate cases). * The subjects were chosen from both sexes. * All participants have kyphosis angle ≥42° * All participants have mechanical neck pain and FHP (craniovertebral angle CVA \< 49).

Exclusion criteria

* Malignancy * Fractures of the cervical spine * Cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy * Vascular syndromes such as vertebrobasilar insufficiency * Rheumatoid arthritis * Neck or upper back surgery * Taking anticoagulants * Local infection * Whiplash injury

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
chest expansion with tape measurementup to four weeksusing tape to measure chest expansion during inspiration and expiration at axillary level and at the level of T10

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pain intensity with pain numerical scale scaleup to four weeksThe subject was instructed to place a vertical mark on the line to indicate his/her pain which zero is no pain and ten being severe pain.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026