Skip to content

Ridge Augmentation Treatment Using OSSIX® BREEZE vs Jason®

Ridge Augmentation Treatment Using OSSIX® BREEZE vs Jason® Membrane in Simultaneous Implantations. A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05584566
Enrollment
65
Registered
2022-10-18
Start date
2022-12-01
Completion date
2026-07-01
Last updated
2024-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ridge Augmentation

Brief summary

This is a prospective randomized controlled parallel trial. The aim of this study is to evaluate bone formation and soft tissue healing after 4 and 8 months in patients with ridge deficiencies in simultaneous implantation approach. The trial will compare a (sugar cross linked) - SCL pericardium membrane OSSIX® Breeze vs native pericardium membrane (Jason®).

Interventions

DEVICEOSSIX Breeze

barrier membrane

DEVICEJason membrane

barrier membrane

Sponsors

Datum Dental LTD
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Males and females, age 18 and above. 2. General good health (ASA 1 and ASA 2). 3. Adults with buccal bone defect, who are in need of implant placement, and going through a guided bone regeneration treatment. 4. Patient needs 1-3 implants. 5. Good oral hygiene (full mouth plaque index \<25%). 6. Adequate control of inflammation (full mouth bleeding on probing \<25%). 7. Patient is willing to sign an informed consent and participate in the clinical study. 10 8. Patient is able to understand and comply with the study related procedures, such as exercising good oral hygiene and attending all follow-up examinations.

Exclusion criteria

1. Physical status ASA III or ASA IV. 2. General contraindications for dental and/or surgical treatments. 3. Inflammatory and autoimmune disease of the oral cavity. 4. Patients with known collagen hypersensitivity. 5. Patients with sensitivity to porcine-derived materials. 6. Patients suffering from autoimmune diseases and connective tissue diseases, such as: systemic lupus erythematosus, dermatomyositis, etc. 7. Acute infection in the oral cavity or acute inflammation at the implantation site. 8. General diseases, where measures of stomatology, maxillo-facial surgery, implantology, periodontology, endodontology or other measures of oral surgery are contraindicated. 9. Disease of oral mucosa. 10. Uncontrolled periodontal disease 11. Concurrent or previous radiotherapy of head area. 12. Concurrent or previous immunosuppressant, bisphosphonate, or high-dose corticosteroid therapy. 13. Smoking (over 10 cigarettes a day). 14. Pregnant or lactating women. 15. Women of childbearing potential, who are not using a highly effective method of birth control. 16. Participation in another investigational device, drug, or biologics study within the last 24 weeks prior to study entry.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
increase in bone gain4 monthsincrease in bone gain (vertical and horizontal) in mm, 4 months after the implant placement in the augmented site. the measurment will be done according to radiographic images

Countries

Israel, United Kingdom

Contacts

Primary ContactGavriel Chaushu, prof
GavrielCe@clalit.org.il+97239377207

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026