Skip to content

Medical Treatment Versus Surgery in Stricturing Small Bowel Crohn's Disease

SyMptomAtic Stricturing Small Bowel CRohn's Disease - Medical Treatment Versus Surgery, a Prospective, Multi-centre, Randomized, Non-inferiority Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05584228
Acronym
SMART
Enrollment
150
Registered
2022-10-18
Start date
2026-10-01
Completion date
2031-04-01
Last updated
2026-06-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Crohn Disease

Keywords

Crohn's disease, stricture, resection, infliximab, azathioprine

Brief summary

The objective of the SMART trial is to compare a combination therapy using azathioprine and subcutaneous infliximab versus ileocecal resection in patients with symptomatic small bowel Crohn's disease.

Detailed description

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic, disabling and destructive inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) leading to progressive and cumulative bowel damage, including fistulas and strictures. Strictures are defined as intestinal luminal narrowing and can lead to obstructive symptoms in the medium-to-long term. Symptomatic strictures significantly impair patient's quality of life by the presence of obstructive symptoms such as abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, abdominal distension, and dietary restrictions leading to malnutrition. Strictures can appear anywhere in the gastrointestinal tract, but affect most commonly the terminal ileum. Epidemiological studies indicate that more than 40% of patients with ileal CD will develop strictures. However, treatment strategies are not well-defined in this indication. Most patients undergo surgery but recent observations indicate that a medical treatment by anti-TNF may be considered in stricturing CD. The European Crohn's Colitis Organization recommends that "ileocecal CD with obstructive symptoms, but no significant evidence of active inflammation, should be treated by surgery". However, the lack of inflammation is difficult to demonstrate and does not predict the extent of fibrosis, and inflammation and fibrosis are often associated. Thus, there is a need for better defining therapeutic strategies. The objective of the SMART trial is to compare for the first time medical versus surgical approaches in stricturing CD. Indeed, up to date, no randomized controlled trial has been conducted to compare medical treatment alone versus surgery in patients with symptomatic stricturing CD. The hypothesis is that medical treatment by a combination therapy using infliximab and azathioprine is non-inferior to surgical resection in terms of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at 1 year, with the advantage of being conservative as regards the high rates of post-operative recurrence with the subsequent risk of small bowel syndrome, as well as highly more acceptable by patients, especially since infliximab is now available as a biosimilar in a subcutaneous formulation, which should also improve the cost-effectiveness of the medical strategy.

Interventions

DRUGAzathioprine + infliximab

Combination therapy using 2-2.5 mg/kg oral azathioprine plus subcutaneous infliximab

Ileocolonic or small bowel resection

Sponsors

Nantes University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
Groupe d'Etude Therapeutique des Affections Inflammatoires Digestives
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 18 and 70 years * Male or female * Documented small bowel CD with intestinal stricture(s) identified on CT, MRI or endoscopy, AND responsible for obstructive symptoms * CREOLE score \> 2

Exclusion criteria

* Adults under guardianship, safeguard justice or trusteeship * Pregnant or breastfeeding female * Acute bowel obstruction requiring urgent surgical intervention * Suspected or confirmed gastrointestinal perforation * Concurrent active perianal sepsis * Internal fistulizing disease in association with strictures * Colonic stenosis and/or colonic active disease at screening endoscopy * Contra-indication to surgery, general anesthesia, anti-TNF, thiopurines * Use of corticosteroids (prednisolone \> 20 mg daily or equivalent) within 4 weeks prior to visit V0 * Treatment with any biologics within 8 weeks before visit V0 * Presence of a stoma * HIV/HCV/HBV infection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
IBD (inflammatory bowel disease) - related quality of life12 monthsMean total inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (IBDQ - Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire ) score. The total score ranges from 32 to 224, the higher the score the better the quality of life.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
IBD (inflammatory bowel disease) -related quality of life1, 3, 6, 9, 18 and 24 monthsMean total inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (IBDQ - Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire ) score. The total score ranges from 32 to 224, the higher the score the better the quality of life.
Endoscopic remission6 monthsProportion of patients achieving endoscopic remission at month 6 (SES-CD \< 2 in case of medical treatment or Rutgeerts score \< i,2 in case of resection)
Obstructive symptoms1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 monthsMean total score of CDOS (CROHN'S DISEASE OBSTRUCTIVE SCORE ) Scale frome 0 to 6. 0 is the best outcome.
Clinical activity1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 monthsMean total score of CDAI (CROHN'S DISEASE ACTIVITY INDEX ) Scale from 0 to 1100. 0 is the best outcome.
inflammatory biomarkers (fecal calprotectin)1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 monthsMean values of fecal calprotectin
inflammatory biomarkers ( C-reactive protein [CRP])1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 monthsMean values of CRP
imaging parameters12 monthsProportion of patients with an improvement in wall thickening, contrast enhancement, T2-signal increase, diffusion weighted-signal increase and length of pathological segment at month 12 as compared to screening imaging (MRI) by physician global assessment
treatment failures12 and 24 monthsProportion of patients without any treatment failures
patient-reported outcomes (disability)1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 monthsMean total score of IBD-DI (INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE DISABILITY INDEX ) Score from 0 to 100. 0 is the best outcome (no disability)
patient-reported outcomes (work productivity)1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 monthsMean total score of WPAI (WORK PRODUCTIVITY AND ACTIVITY IMPAIRMENT QUESTIONNAIRE) In percentage from 0 to 100.
patient-reported outcomes (fatigue)1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 monthsMean total score of FACIT-F (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy ) scores from 0 to 52, with higher scores corresponding to less fatigue
patient-reported outcomes (body image)1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 monthsMean total score of body image questionnaire Ranges from 0 to 30 and can be calculated by summing up the 10 items. A higher score means a higher level of body image disturbance
patient-reported outcomes (generic quality-of-life)1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 monthsMean total score of SF-36 (QUESTIONNAIRE SHORT FORM 36 HEALTH SURVEY ) Score ranging from 0 to 100. A low score reflects a perception of poor health, loss of function, presence of pain. A high score reflects a perception of good health, absence of functional deficit and pain
patient-reported outcomes (anxiety/depression)1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 monthsMean total score of HAD (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale) 14 items rated from 0 to 3. Seven questions relate to anxiety (total A) and seven others to the depressive dimension (total D), thus allowing two scores (maximum score for each score = 21). Minimum : 0. The best outcome is 0.
Patient's acceptability -patients refusing to be included24 monthsNumber of screened patients refusing to be included
patient's acceptability - The reason24 monthsThe reason for refusing
intervention-related adverse events24 monthsProportion of patients with intervention (drug or surgery) -related adverse events during the study
efficiency of medical treatment compared to surgery as assessed by a cost-utility analysis performed from a collective perspective24 monthsIncremental cost-utility ratio (cost per Quality-Adjusted Life-Years, QALYs) from a collective perspective

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTCatherine Le Berre
catherine.leberre@chu-nantes.fr(0)2 40 08 31 52

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 24, 2026