Skip to content

The Ultracyt Study - is EU-TIRADS Useful in Selecting Nodules for Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology?

Selective Ultrasound Guided Cytology Using EU-TIRADS Versus Non-selective Ultrasound Guided Cytology for Diagnosing Thyroid Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05583097
Acronym
Ultracyt
Enrollment
195
Registered
2022-10-17
Start date
2022-02-15
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2025-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Thyroid Cancer, Thyroid Nodule

Keywords

Ultrasonography, Cytology, Thyroid Cancer, Thyroid Nodule, Diagnostics

Brief summary

This is a randomized study evaluating selective fine-needle aspiration cytology based on structured ultrasound using EU-TIRADS versus non-selective ultrasound guided cytology. Primary outcome is frequency of suspicious cytology (Bethesda III-VI) which is expected to be higher in the selective group compared to the non-selective group. Secondary outcome is the frequency of malignancy which is expected to be equal in both groups. However, the investigators do not expect to reach statistical significance for the secondary outcome according to power calculations.

Detailed description

Thyroid nodules are common in the population, and the reported incidence of thyroid cancer is increasing in most parts of the world. Palpable thyroid nodules are reported in 4-5 per cent of the population, of which 5-10 per cent are malignant. The reported incidence of thyroid nodules on ultrasound is higher. EU-TIRADS has been shown in retrospective cohort studies to accurately stratify thyroid nodules with respect to risk of thyroid cancer. EU-TIRADS has been used in Western Sweden since 2017 and in 2021 it was implemented in the Swedish National Guidelines for thyroid cancer. To the knowledge of the investigators, no randomized controlled study has been carried out validating EU-TIRADS. This multicenter regional study aims to investigate the safety of using selective cytology using EU-TIRADS. Primary outcome is the result of cytology suspicious of thyroid cancer. In the selective group, low risk nodules will not undergo cytology and therefore the frequency of cytologically suspicious nodules (Bethesda III-VI) is expected to be higher in this group.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTNon-selective cytology

All noduleas are evaluated according to EU-TIRADS. Cytology performed on all nodules larger than 1 cm regardless of ultrasonographic features. Nodules 1 cm or smaller evaluated as EU-TIRADS 5 undergo cytologic examination if possible.

Sponsors

Göteborg University
CollaboratorOTHER
Vastra Gotaland Region
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomization 1:1 in blocks of 10.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients referred to ultrasonography of the thyroid due to goiter symtoms or positive findings on FDG-PET

Exclusion criteria

* Patients previously examined with ultrasonography of the thyroid * Patients who have previously undergone thyroid surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Frequency of suspicious cytology (Bethesda III-VI) in each arm.Through study completion, up to 18 months.Fewer nodules in the selective cytology group will most likely undergo fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). However, since ultrasonographically benign nodules will not undergo FNAC the frequency of Bethesda III-VI is expected to be higher in the selective cytology group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Frequency of malignancyThrough study completion, up to 18 months.The frequency of malignancy is expected to be similar in both groups. Only patients undergoing surgery will be included in this analysis. The investigators do not expect to find statistical significance according to power calculations.

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026