Skip to content

Additional Effect of Subthreshold Micropulse Laser to Intravitreous Injection of Bevacizumab on Diabetic Macular Edema

Additional Effect of Sub-threshold Micro-pulse Laser to Intra-vitreous Injection of Bevacizumab on Diabetic Macular Edema: A Randomized Double-blinded Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05582577
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-10-17
Start date
2022-10-15
Completion date
2023-12-15
Last updated
2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Macular Edema

Brief summary

In this study, all eyes with diabetic macular edema who meet the inclusion criteria and do not meet the exclusion criteria will be included. After the eye examination, the eyes will be randomly divided into 2 groups {group A: intravitreal interjection of Bevacizumab and subthreshold micropulse laser, and group B: intravitreal injection of Bevacizumab alone}. For both groups, 3 intravitreal injections of bevacizumab with a dose of 1.25 mg will be performed, in sterile conditions at 1-month intervals as a loading dose. A subthreshold micropulse laser will be performed after the third injection in group A and a sham laser will be performed after the third injection in group B. Then, the intravitreal injection of Bevacizumab will be continued if the central thickness of the macula is equal to or greater than 300 microns. The follow-up will be performed 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 months after the first injection. In each follow-up (except for the first month), ophthalmological examinations and Optical Coherence Tomography will be performed.

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTIntravitreal bevacizumab injection with subthreshold micropulse laser

Group A: intravitreal interjection of Bevacizumab and subthreshold micropulse laser

DRUGIntravitreal bevacizumab injection alone

Group B: Intravitreal injection of Bevacizumab alone

Sponsors

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* \> 18 years diabetic patients * Center-involved diabetic macular edema * Mean central subfield thickness \>300 micrometers * Best-corrected visual acuity between 20/40 and 20/400

Exclusion criteria

* hemoglobin A1c \> 8 * High-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy * Prior treatment with intravitreal or peribulbar injections within the preceding 3 months * History of panretinal photocoagulation within the former 4 months * History of macular photocoagulation * Hx of Intraocular surgery (except cataract extraction) * cataract extraction less than 6 months ago * Macular edema due to a cause other than diabetic retinopathy * Any other ocular condition that visual acuity would not improve from the resolution of the edema (eg, foveal atrophy) * Substantial cataract estimated to have reduced visual acuity by \>3 lines * uveitis, neovascular glaucoma, exudative age-related macular degeneration, high risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy * vitreomacular traction or epiretinal membrane * uncontrolled glaucoma ( \> 30 millimeters of mercury with anti-glaucoma medications) * Not having: Media clarity, pupillary dilation, and subject cooperation sufficient for adequate fundus photographs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from 10 months central macular thickness at 12 monthsChange from 10 months to 12 monthsChange from 10 months central macular thickness at 12 months using Optical Coherence Tomography
Change from baseline central macular thickness at 2 monthsChange from baseline to 2 monthsChange from baseline central macular thickness at 2 months using Optical Coherence Tomography
Change from 2 months central macular thickness at 3 monthsChange from 2 months to 3 monthsChange from 2 months central macular thickness at 3 months using Optical Coherence Tomography
Change from 3 months central macular thickness at 4 monthsChange from 3 months to 4 monthsChange from 3 months central macular thickness at 4 months using Optical Coherence Tomography
Change from 4 months central macular thickness at 6 monthsChange from 4 months to 6 monthsChange from 4 months central macular thickness at 6 months using Optical Coherence Tomography
Change from 6 months central macular thickness at 8 monthsChange from 6 months to 8 monthsChange from 6 months central macular thickness at 8 months using Optical Coherence Tomography
Change from 8 months central macular thickness at 10 monthsChange from 8 months to 10 monthsChange from 8 months central macular thickness at 10 months using Optical Coherence Tomography

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline visual acuity at 2 monthsChange from baseline to 2 monthsChange from baseline best-corrected visual acuity at 2 months
Change from 2 months visual acuity at 3 monthsChange from 2 months to 3 monthsChange from 2 months best-corrected visual acuity at 3 months
Change from 3 months visual acuity at 4 monthsChange from 3 months to 4 monthsChange from 3 months best-corrected visual acuity at 4 months
Change from 4 months visual acuity at 6 monthsChange from 4 months to 6 monthsChange from 4 months best-corrected visual acuity at 6 months
Change from 6 months visual acuity at 8 monthsChange from 6 months to 8 monthsChange from 6 months best-corrected visual acuity at 8 month
Change from 8 months visual acuity at 10 monthsChange from 8 months to 10 monthsChange from 8 months best-corrected visual acuity at 10 months
Change from 10 months visual acuity at 12 monthsChange from 10 months to 12 monthsChange from 10 months best-corrected visual acuity at 12 months

Countries

Iran

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026