Skip to content

Muscle Vibration and Joint Position Sense

Acute Effects of Muscle Vibration on the Elbow Joint Position Sense in Healthy Young Men

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05581459
Enrollment
45
Registered
2022-10-14
Start date
2018-06-06
Completion date
2018-11-15
Last updated
2022-10-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vibration; Exposure

Keywords

Muscle vibration, joint position sense, proprioception, elbow, rehabilitation

Brief summary

The present study aimed to investigate and compare the acute effect of local vibration (63 Hz vs 42 Hz frequencies) on the biceps brachii muscles on the elbow joint position sense (JPS) in healthy young men. Forty-five healthy young men aged 19 to 30 years were enrolled in the study. The participants were randomly assigned to receive either 63 Hz (n=15) or 42 Hz (n=15) or sham vibration (control group) (n=15). Participants in the experimental group received five bouts of 1-minute of each vibration exposure localized to the biceps brachii muscle, with a 1-minute rest between the bouts. Active elbow joint position error (in degrees) was selected as an outcome measure to assess elbow JPS. To measure active elbow joint position error, the subject was made to sit on the chair with eyes closed and shoulders in 0 degree of abduction and elbows fully extended. The examiner passively moved the elbow to 90 degrees of flexion (target position) and maintained it for 10 seconds. The subject was requested to memorize the target position. The subject was asked to actively flex the elbow to the target position from the initial starting position (elbow fully extended) and hold it for 5 seconds. Three trials were conducted, with a 30-second rest given between each trial. The target and reproduced angles in each trial were measured using a standard plastic goniometer. The difference between the target and reproduced angles in each trial was calculated to determine active elbow joint position error. Measurements were taken at baseline and immediately after the vibration protocol.

Interventions

OTHER63 Hz Vibration

Vibrations of 63 Hz were applied with handheld vibration device.

OTHER42 Hz Vibration

Vibrations of 42 Hz were applied with handheld vibration device.

Handheld device was applied to the participants without any vibrations.

Sponsors

King Saud University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
19 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy young men

Exclusion criteria

* history of recent upper extremity surgery * history of sensory deficits in the upper extremity * recent upper extremity injury * undergoing any resistance training

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Active elbow joint position error1 dayParticipants were asked to actively reproduce a target position of the elbow joint.

Countries

Saudi Arabia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026