Stroke, Rehabilitation, Technology, Mirror Movement Therapy
Conditions
Brief summary
In the proposed study, the investigators assumed that mirror therapy combined with augmented reality technology will provide a better treatment effects than traditional mirror therapy for the patients with unilateral stroke. The aim of the study is to examine the difference in the treatment effects among the combination of task-oriented training with either augmented reality based mirror therapy, mirror therapy or traditional occupational therapy on the upper extremity function and brain activity of the stroke patients.
Interventions
Motor training targeted to goals that are relevant to the functional needs of the patient
OTHERMirror therapy using a mirror box
Mirror therapy using a mirror box
OTHERAugmented reality-based mirror therapy
Augmented reality-based mirror therapy
Sponsors
National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Clinical diagnosis of stroke with unilateral side involved; * A score of Mini-mental state examination greater than 24 for proving higher mental function * Time of onset \> 6 months before treatment begins; and * Premorbid right-handedness.
Exclusion criteria
* Severe vision impairment; * Major cognitive-perceptual deficit; * Other brain disease.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the result of Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) for motor function of upper extremity test | baseline, 9 weeks and 21 weeks | Each item is rated on a three-point ordinal scale (2 points for the detail being performed completely, 1 point for the detail being performed partially, and 0 for the detail not being performed). The maximum motor performance score is 66 points for the upper extremity. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the result of Modified Ashworth scale (MAS) | baseline, 9 weeks and 21 weeks | Muscle tone is defined by the resistance of a muscle being stretched without resistance. The MAS scores were distributed across the entire scale, ranging from 0 to 4, that is convenient for the clinician use. The grading of the scale is described as below: 0) no increase in muscle tone; 1) minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion; 1+) slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the reminder (less than half) of the ROM; 2) more marked increase in tone but only after part is easily flexed; 3) considerable increase in tone; and 4) passive movement is difficult and affected part is rigid in flexion or extension. |
| Change in the result of Box and blocks test | baseline, 9 weeks and 21 weeks | The score is the number of blocks carried from one box to the other in one minute. Higher values represent a better outcome. |
| Change in the result of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (SWM) test | baseline, 9 weeks and 21 weeks | The Semmes-Weinstein monofilamenttest examines the cutaneous pressure threshold, range from 1.65-6.65. Higher values represent a worse outcome. |
| Change in the result of Motor Activity Log | baseline, 9 weeks and 21 weeks | Semi-structured interview examine how much and how well the subject uses their more-affected arm for 30 ADLs. Score range from 0-5. Higher values represent a better outcome. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| changes in oxygenated (HbO) and deoxygenated (Hb) hemoglobin concentrations using near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) | baseline, 9 weeks and 21 weeks | To investigate the activation of specific brain regions |
Countries
Taiwan
Outcome results
None listed