Skip to content

Comparing Hand-sewn (END-TO-END or Kono-S) to Stapled Anastomosis in Ileocolic Resection for Crohn's Disease

Optimising Surgical Anastomosis in Ileocolic Resection for Crohn's Disease to Reduce Recurrent Disease: A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Hand-sewn (END-TO-END or Kono-S) to Stapled Anastomosis (END-to-END Study)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05578235
Acronym
END2END
Enrollment
165
Registered
2022-10-13
Start date
2023-07-13
Completion date
2027-10-01
Last updated
2023-12-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Crohn Disease

Keywords

Crohn's disease, Ileocolic, Endoscopic Recurrence, Ileocolic Anastomosis

Brief summary

The aim of this multicenter randomised controlled trial is to compare the handsewn (end-to-end and Kono-S) to the stapled side-to-side ileocolic anastomosis after ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease with respect to 6 months endoscopic recurrence, functional outcome and health care consumption.

Detailed description

Within the surgical IBD society there has been a lot of attention to technical aspects of ileocolic resection aiming to reduce recurrent Crohn's disease after surgery. Despite optimal surgical and medical management, recurrent disease after surgery is common. Different types of anastomoses with respect to configuration and construction can be made after resection e.g., handsewn (end-to-end and Kono-S) and stapled (side-to-side). The various types of anastomoses might affect endoscopic recurrence and its assessment, the functional outcome, and costs. It is hypothesised that patients who had an end to end reconstruction will have less endoscopic recurrence (less overscoring, and less stases), a better function and consequently health care consumption than the stapled side to side anastomosis.

Interventions

Standard procedure for CD

handsewn end-to-end or Kono-s anastomosis

Sponsors

ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
CollaboratorOTHER
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

There is no blinding to the treatment allocation for the treating surgeon. The treatment will be blinded for the treating gastroenterologist, the endoscopist and the participants.

Intervention model description

Randomised controlled trial. Patients with Crohn's disease will be randomised in a 1:2 ratio for stapled side-to-side anastomose versus handsewn anastomosis (either end-to-end or Kono-S) when performing an ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Males and females aged \>16 years * Ileocolic disease or disease of the neoterminal ileum with an indication for resection * Concurrent therapies with corticosteroids, 5-ASA drugs, thiopurines, MTX, antibiotics, and anti-TNF therapy are permitted. * All patients should have undergone a colonoscopy and a recent update of imaging (e.g. Ultrasound, MR enterography (or CT enterography if MR is contraindicated))- Ability to comply with protocol. * Competent and able to provide written informed consent. * Patient must have been discussed in the local MDT

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to give informed consent. * Patients less than 16 years of age. * Clinically significant medical conditions within the six months before the operation : e.g. myocardial infarction, active angina, congestive heart failure or other conditions that would, in the opinion of the investigators, compromise the safety of the patient. * History of cancer \< 5 years which might influence patients prognosis * Emergent operation. * Pregnant or breast feeding. * Inability to follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months for postoperative assessment, imaging and endoscopy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative endoscopic recurrence at 6 months6 monthsThe postoperative endoscopic recurrence at 6 months following ileocolic resection defined as Rutgeerts \> i2b by central reading

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Histologic and clinical recurrence rate at 6 months following ileocolic resection6 months after surgery
Number of patients in need for restarting immunosuppressive medication within the first year postoperatively for endoscopic or clinical recurrence1 year after surgery* Endoscopic recurrence defined as Rutgeerts \> i2b * Clinical recurrence difned as recurrent CD-related symptoms
Post-operative 30 days complications30 days after surgery
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ)1 year after surgeryQuality of life measured with IBD questionnaire
Hospital costs1 year after surgeryHospital costs per patients in each group
The 5 year reoperation rate for recurrence of disease at the anastomotic site.5 year

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Primary ContactAnouck EG Haanappel, MD
a.e.g.haanappel@amsterdamumc.nl0031650828323

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026