Major Depressive Disorder, Mobile Health
Conditions
Keywords
major depressive disorder, measurement-based care, mobile health
Brief summary
Measurement-based care (MBC) is an evidence-based practice that incorporates routine outcome assessment using validated rating scales to guide collaborative clinical decision-making. Although MBC results in improved outcomes for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), there are barriers to its broad implementation in clinical settings. The use of enhanced MBC (eMBC), with mobile apps that allow patients to track outcomes and engage in self-management via WeChat, may address some of these barriers. This study intends to compare differences of efficacy between the implementation with eMBC using WeChat and the standard MBC implementation using paper-pencil assessments at the clinic, for both implementation and clinical outcomes.
Detailed description
Measurement-based care (MBC) is an evidence-based practice that incorporates routine outcome assessment using validated rating scales to guide collaborative clinical decision-making. Although MBC results in improved outcomes for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), there are barriers to its broad implementation in clinical settings. The use of enhanced MBC (eMBC), with mobile apps that allow patients to track outcomes and engage in self-management via WeChat, may address some of these barriers. Therefore, we present a trial protocol for a 2-arm cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a hybrid implementation-effectiveness design comparing standard MBC implementation versus eMBC implementation with 6-month follow up in 12 mental health centers in Shanghai, China. The eMBC implementation uses a WeChat mini-program that includes outcome tracking using brief questionnaires and self-management lessons supplemented with support by a lay coach via WeChat. The primary implementation outcome is implementation reach, defined as the proportion of eligible patients with a PHQ-9 score recorded in the hospital chart at 6 months after MBC implementation. The primary clinical outcome is clinical remission, defined as a PHQ-9 score of 4 or less at the 6-month follow up. Other implementation and clinical outcomes will be examined, including medication adherence, doctor-patient alliance, and a piggy-back cost-benefit economic analysis. Qualitative interviews will be conducted with physicians and patients to produce an interpretive account of the contextual factors which impact eMBC implementation. This study intends to compare differences of efficacy between the implementation with eMBC using WeChat and the standard MBC implementation using paper-pencil assessments at the clinic, for both implementation and clinical outcomes.
Interventions
OTHERQuestionnaire online
Questionnaire online: all subjects will receive an online questionnaire and complete the Clinician Questionnaire. Semi-structured interviews: semi-structured interviews are conducted with the clinician interviewers using the Clinician Interview Guide. Focus group discussion: Focus group discussions are conducted with patients according to the Patient Focus Group Symposium Manual.
Sponsors
Children's Hospital of Fudan University
Tongji Hospital
Shanghai Mental Health Center
Study design
Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria for clinicians: * Recruited clinicians who are on the job and they come from Shanghai Mental Health Center, the Children's Hospital of Fudan University, and Shanghai Tongji Hospital * Recruited clinicians are of different ages, working years and genders; * Recruited clinicians understand the research content and sign the informed consent form Inclusion criteria for patients with MDD: * Recruited patients should be definitely diagnosed as MDD in their outpatient records, and those patients are in a stable state of illness and can cooperate in completing the questionnaire survey or accepting the focus group discussion; * Recruited patients have junior high school education or above, as well as adequate audio-visual skills, and can fully understand the informed consent form and interview content. * The age of the recruited patients is 12-65 years, and the number of children and adolescents aged 12-18 years is not less than one third of the total sample size of patients; * The enrolled patients or the guardian of them can understand the research content and sign the informed consent form.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| judge the key barriers and promoting factors of the follow-up experiment implementation. | 1years, anticipated | Through the qualitative method of focus group interviews with clinicians and patients, the specific factors hindering the implementation of eMBC by doctors and patients, and the direction of follow-up specific intervention will be identified. Through the quantitative method of online survey of doctors and patients, the population to be implemented in the following second stage, the content and frequency of full course follow-up will be determined, and the specific definition of depression on the full course model will be improved. |
Countries
China
Contacts
Primary ContactJun Chen
Outcome results
None listed