Skip to content

Different Catheter Ablation Strategy in Vasovagal Syncope

Different Catheter Ablation Strategy in Vasovagal Syncope: A Single Center, Prospective, Randomized Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05573178
Enrollment
80
Registered
2022-10-10
Start date
2020-12-26
Completion date
2023-11-30
Last updated
2023-12-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Syncope, Vasovagal

Keywords

Vasovagal syncope, cardioneuroablation

Brief summary

This study is a prospective, single-center randomized controlled clinical trial. patients with refractory vasovagal syncope were randomly divided into two groups according to the proportion of 1:1. Group A: simple left atrial ganglion plexus ablation (RAGP + LSGP + LLGP + LIGP + RIGP ablation); B group: left atrial ganglion plexus combined with right atrial ganglion plexus ablation (group A + consolidation ablation of RAGP at the junction of right atrial septum and superior vena cava). To clarify the role of RAGP in cardiac autonomic nervous system and the effect of ablation, to establish the standard stragtegy of cardiac nerve ablation.

Detailed description

Vasovagal syncope (VVS) is the most common syncope type in clinic, but routine therapy shows no benefits. Cardiac nerve ablation affects the function of cardiovascular system by accurately mapping and ablation of cardiac autonomic ganglion plexus and adjusting cardiac sympathetic-vagal balance. The existing clinical evidence is mostly exploratory or registered clinical studies, and the sample size is small. This study intends to adopt a prospective, randomized controlled study to compare the efficacy of simple left atrial ganglion plexus ablation and left atrial ganglion plexus ablation combined with right atrial ganglion plexus ablation in the treatment of VVS, and to establish the relevant cardiac nerve ablation standards. This study is a prospective, single-center randomized controlled clinical trial. patients with refractory vasovagal syncope were randomly divided into two groups according to the proportion of 1:1. Group A: simple left atrial ganglion plexus ablation (RAGP + LSGP + LLGP + LIGP + RIGP ablation); B group: left atrial ganglion plexus combined with right atrial ganglion plexus ablation (group A + consolidation ablation of RAGP at the junction of right atrial septum and superior vena cava). Atrial modeling was established under the guidance of Ensite three-dimensional mapping system, and then MicroPace EPS 320 was used to stimulate and induce the main distribution areas of autonomic ganglia. The high frequency stimulation mode is set as follows: the stimulation frequency is 20 Hz, the voltage is 10 to 20 volts, and the pulse width is 5 milliseconds. The main sites of high frequency stimulation include: the left superior pulmonary vein and the left atrial posterior wall of LSGP, the left inferior pulmonary vein orifice of LIGP, the LLGP, around the right inferior pulmonary vein orifice, the RIGP, around the right superior pulmonary vein and the left atrial junction of the right superior pulmonary vein, the right atrial septum of RAGP, and the superior vena cava junction to stimulate RAGP. Ganglion localization standard: locate the site of vagal response (ventricular arrest, atrioventricular block, RR interval prolongation at least 50%) after high frequency stimulation, and mark it in the three-dimensional model. Under the guidance of three-dimensional system, the located ganglion plexus was ablated with saline irrigating electrode. The upper limit of power was 40W, the upper limit of temperature was 43 ℃, and the washing rate of saline was 17ml/min. The site of vagal reaction during ablation was defined as the effective ablation site . Denervated interventional therapy. The surgical end point of the treatment was defined as the disappearance of vagal response at the effective ablation site or the ablation of each effective point discharge for at least 30 seconds. Cardiac electrophysiological parameters such as heart rate, AH interval, HV interval, recovery time of sinoatrial node, Wenckebach point of atrioventricular conduction and atrioventricular conduction refractory period were measured before and after ablation. The patients were followed up at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months respectively after ablation procedure, to observe whether there were recurrent syncope and /or pre-syncope (including the time and frequency of recurrent syncope, inducing factors, and whether complicated with fall injury, etc.), and to reassessed tilt test, 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram and fill in Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Euroqol (EQ-5D) quality of life score form. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cardiac nerve ablation in the prevention of refractory vasovagal syncope. The tilt test, the changes of vagus nerve function and the improvement of quality of life before and after were analyzed and compared. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cardiac nerve ablation strategies, and to explore the role and optimization of RAGP in cardiac nerve ablation.

Interventions

Under the guidance of three-dimensional system, the located ganglion plexus was ablated with saline irrigating electrode. The upper limit of power was 40W, the upper limit of temperature was 43 ℃, and the washing rate of saline was 17ml/min. The site of vagal reaction during ablation was defined as the effective ablation site. The surgical end point of denervated interventional therapy is defined as the disappearance of vagal response at the effective ablation site or the ablation of each effective point discharge for at least 30 seconds.

Sponsors

China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Sign the informed consent form. * Definitely diagnosed as vasovagal syncope (according to the 2018 ESC syncope diagnosis and management guidelines). * Positive head-up tilt test (cardiac inhibition type, mixed type). * Syncope attacks ≥ 3 times in 1 year before operation and/or recurrence of syncope in the last 6 months. * More than 2 kinds of routine treatment were ineffective or could not tolerate their side effects.

Exclusion criteria

* Syncope caused by other causes. * Heart failure (NYHA grade Ⅲ or IV), congenital heart disease, valvular heart disease, deficiency. Bloody heart disease, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy and myocarditis, chronic. Hepatic and renal insufficiency, diabetes, nervous system diseases, etc. * Acute coronary syndrome or myocardial infarction occurred in recent 6 months; cerebrovascular events occurred in recent 3 months (such as short. Transient ischemic attack, stroke) or other disturbance of cerebral blood supply. * Previously undergone cardiac catheter ablation, cardiac surgery and / or permanent cardiac pacemaker implantation. * Left atrial thrombus and / or left atrial diameter \> 55mm or EF \< 35% were found by echocardiography or CT. * Pregnancy and lactation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants with syncope during follow up12 month after ablation procedureSyncope was defined as a transient loss of consciousness and complete recovery in a very short time. We documented each time that syncope occurred.
Number of Participants with pre-syncope during follow up12 month after ablation procedurePre-syncope was defined as the prodrome before syncope, such as dizziness, sweating, dyspnea, and paleness, and patients did not actually fall down. We documented each time that syncope occurred.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants with positive results of head-upright tilt test6 month after ablation procedurethe positive results of head-upright tilt test were defined by VASIS standard
changes of deceleration capacity compare to baseline3 days after ablation procedureThe deceleration capacity was calculated with the 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram through the phase-rectified signal averaging technique.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026