Skip to content

Conduction System Pacing Versus Biventricular Resynchronization in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure

Conduction System Pacing Versus Biventricular Resynchronization in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure (PhysioSync-HF)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05572736
Acronym
PhysioSync-HF
Enrollment
179
Registered
2022-10-10
Start date
2022-11-07
Completion date
2025-01-10
Last updated
2025-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Resynchronization, Conduction System Pacing, Heart Failure, Left Bundle-Branch Block

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of conduction system pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block.

Interventions

DEVICEConduction system pacing

Pacing from the His-Purkinje system (His-bundle pacing, left bundle branch area pacing, or deep septal pacing).

Pacing from the coronary sinus and right ventricular leads.

Sponsors

Ministry of Health, Brazil
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Hospital Moinhos de Vento
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female, age ≥18 years * Established diagnosis of symptomatic heart failure (New York Heart Association class II-III) * Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% in prior 3 months * Left bundle branch block (QRS ≥130 ms) * Clinical indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy * Patients should be clinically stable * Patients should receive background standard of care for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, with the maximum tolerated doses of ACE inhibitor or ARB or ARNI, beta-blocker, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist

Exclusion criteria

* Life expectancy \<12 months due to any disease * Dementia or advanced cerebrovascular disease * NYHA class IV * Plan to implant an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), with or without resynchronization therapy (CRT-D) * Enrollment in other clinical trials involving cardiac pacing * Pregnancy or pre-menopausal women who do not use regular contraceptive methods * Patients unable to understand and sign the consent for participation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary Outcome Measure12 monthsHeart failure-related net composite outcome, a hierarchical composite of all-cause death, any hospitalization for heart failure, any urgent heart failure visit, and left ventricular ejection fraction change at 12 months. The category of the composite outcome for each patient will be determined by assessing the following criteria sequentially, stopping when the event is present: All-cause death: death during follow-up. Hospitalization for heart failure: any hospitalization for heart failure during follow-up. Urgent heart failure visit: any urgent heart failure visit during follow-up. Left ventricular ejection fraction change: the difference between baseline and follow-up, categorized by every 5-point change. The distribution of outcome categories will be compared by ordinal distribution analysis. Non-inferiority margin: odds ratio \<1.2.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Left ventricular end-diastolic volume12 months
Change in natriuretic peptide values12 monthsBNP and NT-proBNP
Change in 6-minute walk test12 months
Key secondary outcome: Cost analysis (dominance) (superiority)12 monthsMean total direct medical cost per patient at 12 months.
Change in left ventricular ejection fraction12 months
Change in NYHA Classification12 monthsNew York Heart Association Functional Class
Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score12 monthsThe Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score ranges from 0-100, where a lower score indicates a worse outcome.
EuroQol Group 5-Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D)12 months
Hierarchical endpoint of death, hospitalization for heart failure, urgent heart failure visit, and change in KCCQ Clinical Summary Score12 months
Change in QRS complexDuration of the QRS complex, defined as the widest paced QRS complex rated at 12-lead ECG, measured immediately after the index procedure

Other

MeasureTime frame
Change in peak oxygen consumption (VO2)12 months

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026