Skip to content

Comparison Of Epidural Analgesia Techniques In Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy With Surgical Pleth Index

Comparison On Efficiency Of Surgical Pleth Index-Guided Traditional Epidural And Dural Puncture Epidural Analgesia Techniques In Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomised Double Blind Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05572164
Enrollment
32
Registered
2022-10-07
Start date
2022-10-01
Completion date
2023-12-30
Last updated
2022-10-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Analgesia

Brief summary

Primary aim of this study is to evaluate affect of SPI guided antinociception on total intraoperative consumption of local aneshesics during analgesia. Secondary aims are defining time interval between LA administration and SPI value dropping under 50 and hemodynamy. Tertiary results are total mean local anesthesic consumption per hour, mean LA bolus number, total norepinephrine, ephedrine and atrophine consumption, mean intraoperative heart rate, mean arterial pressure, BIS and minimal alveolar concentration, percentage of intraoperative surgery time during which SPI\>50, time passed until first post operative analgesia need, time needed to be discharged from PACU after operation (evaluated via Aldrte score) and post operative side effects (nausea, vomiting, sedatition and piruritis)

Interventions

PROCEDURETRADITIONAL EPIDURAL

epidural technique used for intraoperative analgesia (the EPL group; local anesthetics will be delivered via epidural catheter guided by SPI to provide intraoperative analgesia)

group on whom dural puncture epidural technique used for intraoperative analgesia ( the DPL group; local anesthetics will be delivered via an epidural catheter placed after a dural pucture performed with the SPI guidance to provide intraoperative analgesia)

Sponsors

Ataturk University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* aged 18-60 * ASA I-III * grade I unilateral PNL

Exclusion criteria

* BMI \> 40 kg/m2 * drug or alcohol abuse history in the last 6 mounts * chronic opoid usage or had chronic pain longer than 6 weeks * peripheral and central neurological disorders * preoperative hemodynamic disorders * irregular sinus rhythm and pace makers * diabetes, severe lung and major liver diseases with increasing biluribin * use of anti-muscarinics, α2-adrenergic agonists, β1-adrenergic agonists, anti arrhythmic; who used chronic psychoactive drugs in last 90 days * who are pregnant and breast feeding * not willing to participate * allergic or intolerant to any of the drugs in the study * procedures that take less than 2 hours

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
consumption of local aneshesicsintraoperativeto evaluate affect of SPI guided antinociception on total intraoperative consumption of local aneshesics during analgesia

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
time interval and SPI value droppingintraoperativedefining time interval between LA administration and SPI value dropping under 50 and hemodynamy
local anesthesic consumptionduring the procedure/surgery and during 30 minutes of PACU staytotal mean local anesthesic consumption per hour, mean LA bolus number, total norepinephrine, ephedrine and atrophine consumption, mean intraoperative heart rate, mean arterial pressure, BIS and minimal alveolar concentration, percentage of intraoperative surgery time during which SPI\>50, time passed until first post operative analgesia need, time needed to be discharged from PACU after operation (evaluated via Aldrte score) and post operative side effects (nausea, vomiting, sedatition and piruritis)

Contacts

Primary ContactAyşenur Dostbil
adostbil@hotmail.com+905333677796

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026