Catastrophizing Pain, Chronic Low-back Pain, Kinesiophobia
Conditions
Brief summary
Recent literature has shown that individuals with persistent chronic pain often exhibit altered cognitive, affective, and sensorimotor behaviors despite a full recovery of peripheral structural injury. Clinically this can be observed via altered pain behaviors (e.g., pain catastrophizing and kinesiophobia) and increased sensitivity to pressure stimuli, each of which are predictive of poorer outcomes. These alterations are believed to have arisen from maladaptive reorganization of brain networks, including cognitive-evaluative and affective networks. Structurally, decreased gray matter in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLFPC), a key area in the cognitive-affective processing of pain, has been found in those suffering from chronic musculoskeletal pain. The changes are shown to be reversible when the pain is successfully treated and uniquely connected to cognitive-affective behaviors in that as catastrophizing or fear decreases, DLPFC density increases. Pain science education (PNE), a cognitive-behavioral intervention, has shown promising effects, especially on cognitive- affective behaviors. Non-invasive brain stimulation, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), has also been shown to reduce pain and pain-associated behavioral changes in chronic pain. However, the combined effects of these two interventions have not been investigated. It remains unclear if priming the cognitive-affective circuitry that is conceptualized to support PNE with tDCS will augment the behavioral effect of PNE. Therefore, the primary objective of this pilot study is to examine the effects of combining PNE and tDCS on pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, and hypersensitivity to pressure stimuli in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). We will also examine the influence of PNE and tDCS on cortical network patterns in a subgroup of participants. The results of this pilot study could support the use of tDCS as a priming agent to increase the effect of cognitive-behavioral interventions such as PNE. With success, this intervention could be safely and easily replicated in the clinical setting and provide a novel approach to treating chronic pain more effectively. In addition, the outcomes can further the understanding of more precisely matching specific cortical targets with the desired behavioral therapy
Interventions
DEVICETranscranial Direct Current Stimulation
Five sessions of tDCS will be performed following completions of baseline data collection. This will include 3 sessions during week one and 2 sessions in week 2. A tDCS unit (neuroConn Ilmenau, Germany) will be applied to the left DLPFC with participants in the sitting position for a 20 minutes of tDCS. An anodal 2.0 mA current will be applied to each participant, including a 30-second ramp up at the beginning of stimulation and a 30 second ramp down period and the end of stimulation. The left DLPFC (F3 from EEG 10/20 system) will be located using the Beam F3 measurement system. These parameters are consistent with those used in current literature on tDCS for pain. tDCS procedures will be performed by the PI (CA).
BEHAVIORALPain Neuroscience Education
Immediately following completion of each tDCS intervention, participants will be given a one-on-one PNE session provided also by the PT (CA), who is a licensed healthcare provider with expertise in delivery of the content. This educational session will last about 30 minutes. Initial sessions will involve discussion and questioning of participants about their own understanding of their pain and this information will be used to subsequently individualize the forthcoming educational sessions. The educational sessions will follow the content of Explain Pain, a patient booklet, and will include information on the neurophysiology of pain, pain as typical process, the transition from acute to chronic pain, neuroplasticity, central sensitization, factors that promote pain chronicity. Information will be presented verbally along with visuals on paper.
Sponsors
High Point University
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
Pilot study - intervention group only
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Reports chronic low back pain defined as a back pain problem that has persisted at least 3 months and has resulted in pain on at least half the days in the past 6 months * Age: 18-65 years * Score \>30 on Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Exclusion criteria
* History of previous lower back surgery * Systemic joint disease (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis) * Evidence of red flags (e.g. fracture, infection, tumor, cauda equina syndrome) * Cancer * Neurological disorders * Neuropathy * Raynaud's disease * Pregnancy * An inability to maintain the testing and treatment positions (i.e. sitting for \>30 minutes). *
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Pain Catastrophizing Scale | Completed prior to first intervention session and immediately following final intervention sessions | The 13-item PCS (0-52) will be used to determine each participant's pain catastrophizing level. Pain catastrophizing is characterized by the tendency to magnify pain stimulus and to feel helpless in the presence of pain. A higher score indicates higher pain catastrophizing level. |
| Change in Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia | Completed prior to first intervention session and immediately following final intervention sessions | . The 17-item TSK (17-68) will be used to determine each participant's level of fear of movement. A higher score indicates higher level of kinesiophobia. |
| Change in Stroop Color Word Test | Completed prior to first intervention session and immediately following final intervention sessions | The Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT) will be used to assess participants ability to inhibit cognitive interference. Cognitive interference occurs when the processing of one stimulus influences the ability to process another feature of the same stimulus. |
| Change in Numeric Pain Rating Scale | Completed prior to first intervention session and immediately following final intervention sessions | The NPRS (0-10) will be recorded by the participants rating their current pain on the day of assessment, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst imaginable pain. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Pressure Pain Thresholds | Completed prior to first intervention session and immediately following final intervention sessions | : PPTs will be measured using a pressure algometer (Wagner Instruments, Greenwich, CT) by a research team member. The algometer will be pressed at a steady rate into the most tender point of low back. Participants will indicate when the applied pressure becomes painful (i.e., pain threshold). Three trials will be performed and the last two measurements will be averaged and used for statistical analysis. |
| Change in Comprehensive Trail Making | Completed prior to first intervention session and immediately following final intervention sessions | The Trail making A and B is used to assess participants ability to sustain focus and shift between sets of different stimuli. Part A: Consists of 25 circles numbered from 1 to 25 randomly distributed over a page of letter size paper. The participant is required to connect the circles with a pencil as quickly as possible in numerical sequence beginning with the number 1. Part B: Consists of 25 circles numbered 1 to 13 and lettered A to L, randomly distributed over a page of paper. The participant is required to connect the circles with a pencil as quickly as possible, but alternating between numbers and letters and taking both series in ascending sequence (i.e. 1, A, 2, B, 3, C…) |
| Change in Coding Test | Completed prior to first intervention session and immediately following final intervention sessions | — |
Other
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Functional MRI | Completed with 1-2 weeks prior to intervention protocol and within 1 week of completion of the protocol |
Countries
United States
Contacts
Primary ContactCory A Alcon, DPT
Outcome results
None listed