Skip to content

Effects of a Mobile Application RA Joint Protection and Activity Self-management Program

Effectiveness of Mobile Application Self-management Program (App) for Joint Protection and Physical Activity in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05570175
Enrollment
46
Registered
2022-10-06
Start date
2021-08-01
Completion date
2022-07-31
Last updated
2025-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Keywords

self-management, self-efficacy, mobile application

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of mobile application self-management program (App) for joint protection and physical activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Intervention group received an app self-management program. The researchers compared the effects of the experimental group and the control group in disease activity, physical functioning, self-efficacy, depression, and self-management behavior.

Detailed description

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a persistent systemic disease. World Health Organization commented that a crucial goal of heath care for RA is prevention of loss of daily function by patients' self-management (SM) skills; however, the evidences from literature presented that there are some limitations in traditional self-management interventions, and a comprehensive rheumatoid arthritis online self-management program for RA patients' day-to-day self-managing is limited in Taiwan. The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of mobile application self-management program (App) for joint protection and physical activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The project was designed to implement and evaluate the app rheumatoid arthritis self-management program for RA patients using two groups experimental design. A medical center in northern Taiwan was selected and patients who visited the RA departments were eligible for the study if they are diagnosis of RA, age of 20 years or over, disease considered by the treating rheumatologist to have been stable for at least 12 weeks, able to communicate with researcher, and use a mobile. Patients were excluded if they are suffering from other terminal illnesses, severe dementia or another debilitating psychiatric disorder, or living in a long-term care facility. After completion of baseline data, patients were randomly allocated to the intervention or control group using a computerized allocation procedure and follow the CONSORT flow diagram. Control patients received usual care, and the intervention group received the 6-week app rheumatoid arthritis self-management program which based on self-efficacy theory. The independent variable of the program was the four information include mastery experience, social modeling, social persuasion and physical and emotional states, and the strategies involve education, goal setting and attainment, self-monitoring, and phone calls. All participants were followed up for 6 months, and the data were collected at the baseline, 8, and 12 weeks. The statistics with the generalized estimating equation analysis was used to evaluate the outcomes such as the disease activity (DAS-28), arthritis self-efficacy (ASE), physical functioning (MHAQ), depression, and self-management behaviors.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMobile application RA joint protection and activity self-management program

The intervention group received a mobile application RA joint protection and activity self-management program based on self-efficacy theory for 6 weeks. The program was based on self-efficacy theory and proposes that self-efficacy is influenced by four information sources: mastery of experience, social modeling, social persuasion and one's physical and emotional states. To enhance participants' self-management skill, the following strategies were employed: peer story-telling, assessment, family involvement, goal setting, self-monitoring, self-evaluation, and phone calls consultation.

Sponsors

National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The researcher who collected the data and the researcher who applied the intervention program was never the same.

Intervention model description

Participants were randomly assigned to experimental group who received a mobile application RA joint protection and activity self-management program based on self-efficacy theory for 6 weeks, and a control group receiving standard rheumatology care only.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Months to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with RA * Age of 20 years or over * Disease considered have been stable for at least 3 months * Able to understand and comply with the study treatment * Use a mobile

Exclusion criteria

* Suffering from other terminal illnesses, severe dementia or another debilitating psychiatric disorder * Living in a long-term care facility

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-management Behaviors12 weeksTo assess self-management behaviors the researchers developed a joint activity and protection self-management behaviors scale. The scale consists of eight items and ranges from zero for 'never' to four for 'always'. The range of the score will be 0-32, higher scores indicate a better level of use of each of the self-management behavior.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disease Activity12 weeksDisease activity was measured using the DAS-28 (Disease Activity Score-28) which evaluated 28 tender and swollen joint counts of rheumatoid arthritis patients. This scale was used to calculate the 28 tender and swollen joint counts. Scores can range from 0 to 9.4. The lower score represent a better RA outcome.
Arthritis Self-efficacy- Pain12 weeksWe used the arthritis self-efficacy-pain (ASE-pain) to measure RA patients' pain self-efficacy. The ASE-pain used visual analogue scales (0-10), in which 0 means 'very uncertain' and 10 means 'very certain'; a higher score refers to better self-efficacy. This scale have 5 items, therefore, the score range will be 0-50.
Arthritis Self-efficacy- Other12 weeksWe used the arthritis self-efficacy-other (ASE-OS) to measure RA patients' other symptoms self-efficacy. The ASE-OS used visual analogue scales (0-10), in which 0 means 'very uncertain' and 10 means 'very certain'; a higher score refers to better self-efficacy. This scale have 6 items, therefore, the score range will be 0-60.
Physical Functioning12 weeksThe 8-item Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ) was used to measure the physical functioning for this study. The MHAQ measures eight activities such as dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach grip, and common daily activities. Items are rated from 1 = without difficulty, to 4 = unable to do; a lower score indicates a better ability to conduct daily activities. The range of the score will be 8-32.

Countries

Taiwan

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention Group
The intervention group received a mobile application RA joint protection and activity self-management program based on self-efficacy theory for 6 weeks. Mobile application RA joint protection and activity self-management program: The intervention group received a mobile application RA joint protection and activity self-management program based on self-efficacy theory for 6 weeks. The program was based on self-efficacy theory and proposes that self-efficacy is influenced by four information sources: mastery of experience, social modeling, social persuasion and one's physical and emotional states. To enhance participants' self-management skill, the following strategies were employed: peer story-telling, assessment, family involvement, goal setting, self-monitoring, self-evaluation, and phone calls consultation.
25
Control Group
The control group received general information on rheumatoid arthritis care and follow-up.
21
Total46

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIntervention GroupControl GroupTotal
Age, Continuous55.84 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.54
62.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.86
58.70 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.98
Duration of RA9.06 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.33
14.33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.12
11.47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.35
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
25 Participants21 Participants46 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
25 participants21 participants46 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants17 Participants39 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Self-management Behaviors

To assess self-management behaviors the researchers developed a joint activity and protection self-management behaviors scale. The scale consists of eight items and ranges from zero for 'never' to four for 'always'. The range of the score will be 0-32, higher scores indicate a better level of use of each of the self-management behavior.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention GroupSelf-management Behaviors13.24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.67
Control GroupSelf-management Behaviors14.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.71
Secondary

Arthritis Self-efficacy- Other

We used the arthritis self-efficacy-other (ASE-OS) to measure RA patients' other symptoms self-efficacy. The ASE-OS used visual analogue scales (0-10), in which 0 means 'very uncertain' and 10 means 'very certain'; a higher score refers to better self-efficacy. This scale have 6 items, therefore, the score range will be 0-60.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention GroupArthritis Self-efficacy- Other30.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.75
Control GroupArthritis Self-efficacy- Other33.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.51
Secondary

Arthritis Self-efficacy- Pain

We used the arthritis self-efficacy-pain (ASE-pain) to measure RA patients' pain self-efficacy. The ASE-pain used visual analogue scales (0-10), in which 0 means 'very uncertain' and 10 means 'very certain'; a higher score refers to better self-efficacy. This scale have 5 items, therefore, the score range will be 0-50.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention GroupArthritis Self-efficacy- Pain24.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.47
Control GroupArthritis Self-efficacy- Pain24.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.63
Secondary

Disease Activity

Disease activity was measured using the DAS-28 (Disease Activity Score-28) which evaluated 28 tender and swollen joint counts of rheumatoid arthritis patients. This scale was used to calculate the 28 tender and swollen joint counts. Scores can range from 0 to 9.4. The lower score represent a better RA outcome.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention GroupDisease Activity3.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.23
Control GroupDisease Activity3.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.81
Secondary

Physical Functioning

The 8-item Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ) was used to measure the physical functioning for this study. The MHAQ measures eight activities such as dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach grip, and common daily activities. Items are rated from 1 = without difficulty, to 4 = unable to do; a lower score indicates a better ability to conduct daily activities. The range of the score will be 8-32.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention GroupPhysical Functioning23.32 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.34
Control GroupPhysical Functioning23.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.97

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026