Skip to content

Cryoanalgesia to Prevent Acute and Chronic Pain Following Nuss Procedure

Cryoanalgesia in Combination With the Novel Prehabilitation Program Back on Feet Are the Essential Parts of Enhanced Recovery Protocol in the Minimal Invasive Modyfied Nuss Procedure of Children With Funnel Chest Deformation.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05570097
Enrollment
40
Registered
2022-10-06
Start date
2022-09-28
Completion date
2022-12-10
Last updated
2023-03-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Excavatum, Pectus, Funnel Chest

Keywords

nuss procedure, ERAS, cryolesia, cryoanalgesia

Brief summary

This Study study compared standard therapy (multimodal and regional analgesia) versus a novel approach (Cryoanalgesia combined with bilateral erector spine plane block and multimodal analgesia) in subjects undergoing minimal invasive modyfied Nuss procedure (thoracoscopy).

Detailed description

Funnel chest deformation is a great challenge for therapeutic teams due to severe pain in the postoperative period as well as chronic pain. The use of many analgesic drugs, including opioids, is associated with adverse side effects, difficulties with rehabilitation, an increased risk of complications, prolonged hospitalisation, and the cost of the procedure. Cryoanalgesia as a part of multimodal analgesia along with the education and prehabilitation of the patient according to the novel original educational - training application 'Back on Feet' as well as the interdisciplinary care in accordance with the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol, which has a real impact on the optimisation of perioperative care. This Before - After Study is a single institution pilot study designed to compare standard therapy (control group: regional analgesia: intrapleural or bilateral erector spine plane block) versus a novel approach (interventional group: Cryoanalgesia combined with bilateral single shot erector spine plane block) to address the need for better management of acute and long-term pain in the pediatric population diagnosed with funnel-chest and treated using the modyfied Nuss method. First group received a standard care according to Polish guidelines. The data of control group analysed and the interdisciplinary team work protocol will be introduced to the interventional group. The interventional group was prepared according to prehabilitation with the 'Back on feet' application and perioperative ERAS protocols. The patients of interventional group received intraoperative cryoanalgesia using the Cryo-S Painless device (Metrum - Cryoflex Polska Limited) as an additional procedure to multimodal analgesia. This is the first time that the cryoanalgesia procedure was performed in children in Poland. The aims of the study were the assessment the effectiveness of cryoanalgesia as a method of acute and long-term pain control, safety of the method and the impact of preoperative preparation according to the 'Back on Feet' program introduced as a part of ERAS protocol. Specific Aim 1: To determine if, compared with current analgesia, the addition of cryoanalgesia decreases the incidence and severity of post-surgical pain. Hypothesis 1a (primary): The severity of surgically-related pain was significantly decreased from postoperative day 2 with the addition of cryoanalgesia as compared with patients receiving solely standard-of-care treatment. Hypothesis 1b: The incidence and severity of chronic pain was significantly decreased 3 months following surgery with the addition of cryoanalgesia as compared with patients receiving solely standard-of-care treatment. Specific Aim 2: To determine if, compared with current analgesia, the addition of cryoanalgesia improves postoperative functioning. Hypothesis 2a: Following modyfied Nuss procedure the range of motion and independence was significantly increased in the 2 postoperative day following operation with the addition of cryoanalgesia as compared with patients receiving solely standard-of-care treatment. The results were compared in terms of demographics, pain levels, side effects of the pain relief medications in the postoperative period, quality and length of rehabilitation, patient satisfaction using the Quality of Life by modyfied Nuss questionnaire, and the total costs of hospitalization.

Interventions

DEVICEintercostal nerves cryoanalgesia

Intraoperative Cryolesia of at least 5 intercostal nerves added to regional analgesia: bilateral erector spine plane block and multimodal therapy.

Sponsors

Pomeranian Medical University Szczecin
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Before - after study: First: control group as a standard treatment in Poland, review, then: interventional group

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
10 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients undergoing pectus excavatum repair with modyfied minimal invasive thoracoscopic NUSS technique * aged 10 years or above 10 * informed consent signed for cryoanalgesia

Exclusion criteria

* Age of 9 years or below * Refuse to receive cryoanalgesia or regional analgesia as primary pain relief * Any contraindication to cryoanalgesia * Difficult follow-up for geographical reasons and/or impossibility by the patient to understand how to perform self-measurements

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The worse pain occurence during first 24 hours after operationup to 24 hours after operationNumeric pain score. Range from 0 to 10.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Thoracic hypo-aesthesia occurenceup to 24 hours after operationCold test assessment (Yes/No)
Assessment of sleeping qualityPostoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ,6Collect difficulties of sleeping due to pain? (binary answer: yes or no; not based on a scale or instrument)
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) occurencePostoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ,6binary answer: yes or no; not based on a scale or instrument
Analgesic consumption post operationPostoperative days 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,6, as well as months 1 and 3Total analgesic (including opioids) consumption for previous 24 hours
Total narcotic use post-operation0-6 postoperative daysTotal dose and number of days of opioids used during hospitalization
Cost Analysisestimated 1 weektotal costs of hospitalization
Duration of hospitalizationestimated 1 weekthe length of the time (in days) spent in the hospital
Residual wound or chest pain occurencePostoperative months 1, 3The chest or wound chronic pain occurrences

Countries

Poland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026