Skip to content

Semaglutide for the Treatment of Glucose Intolerance in Women With Prior Gestational Diabetes

Semaglutide for the Treatment of Glucose Intolerance in Women With Prior Gestational Diabetes: a Double Blind RCT

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05569772
Acronym
SERENA
Enrollment
252
Registered
2022-10-06
Start date
2023-09-14
Completion date
2029-12-01
Last updated
2026-07-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glucose Intolerance After a Recent History of Gestational Diabetes

Keywords

gestational diabetes, glucose intolerance postpartum, prevention, type 2 diabetes, GLP-1 agonist, semaglutide

Brief summary

Gestational diabetes (GDM) is an important contributor to the increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Women with glucose intolerance in early postpartum are a particularly high-risk group with about 50% who will develop T2DM within 5 years after the delivery. Moreover, women with a history of GDM progress more rapidly to T2DM compared to women with similarly elevated glucose levels. Early intervention after the index pregnancy is therefore crucial to prevent T2DM. With the SERENA project, the investigators aim to reduce the risk to develop T2DM with the long-acting GLP-1 agonist semaglutide in women with a recent history of GDM and glucose intolerance in early postpartum.

Detailed description

Patient population: Women with a recent history of gestational diabetes (GDM) and persistent glucose intolerance in early postpartum are a particularly high risk group, with about 50% developing type 2 diabetes (T2DM) within 5 years after the delivery. Semaglutide is a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist with multiple beneficial metabolic effects, including glucose lowering effect, weight loss and cardiovascular protective effects. The investigators hypothesize that in women with prior GDM and glucose intolerance in early postpartum, treatment with semaglutide will reduce the risk to develop T2DM on the long-term compared to placebo. Intervention and comparison: Belgian multi-centric double blind RCT with 13 centers to compare semaglutide (once weekly) with placebo in women with a recent history of GDM and glucose intolerance \[impaired fasting glycaemia (IFG) and/or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT)\] 6weeks - 12 months postpartum. Participants will be 1/1 randomized to semaglutide or placebo on a background of lifestyle measures. Semaglutide will be uptitrated to 1mg/week over a 8-week period. Participants will be followed-up for 3 years. Participants will receive a 75g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) 3-6 months after the stop of the intervention. Randomization will be stratified according to BMI at the early postpartum visit (\<25; 25-29.9 and ≥30Kg/m²). Outcomes: The primary endpoint is the development of T2DM by 160 weeks defined by fasting plasma glucose, OGTT and/or HbA1c according to the ADA criteria. Important secondary endpoints are assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication) and include: Glycaemic outcomes * Need for glucose-lowering (rescue) therapy; * Frequency of prediabetes based on FPG, OGTT, and/or HbA1c; * Regression to normoglycaemia. Anthropometric and body composition outcomes * Change in body weight, BMI, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio; * Proportion of participants achieving ≥5%, ≥10%, and ≥15% weight loss; * Body fat percentage assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis (Bodystat 1500®). Insulin sensitivity and β-cell function * β-cell function, assessed by HOMA-B, insulinogenic index divided by HOMA-IR, insulin secretion-sensitivity index-2, and the Stumvoll index; * Insulin sensitivity, assessed by the Matsuda index (reflecting whole body insulin sensitivity) and 1/HOMA-IR, reflecting primarily hepatic insulin sensitivity. Cardiometabolic risk factors * Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome; * Blood pressure (blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg) and heart rate; * Lipid profile, including low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-cholesterol, ≥100 mg/dL or ≥2,6 mmol/L) and triglycerides (≥150 mg/dL or ≥1,7 mmol/L). Patient-reported outcomes * Health-related quality of life assessed by SF-36 and EQ-5D-5L; * Symptoms of depression (CES-D) and anxiety (short-form STAI); * Treatment satisfaction assessed using a study-specific questionnaire based on the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire; * Sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) and food security (short-form HFSSM). Biomarker outcomes • Changes in and associations of metabolomic profiles, with cardiometabolic risk and treatment response. Health economic outcomes * Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs); * Incremental costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of semaglutide compared with placebo. * Health economic analyses are considered exploratory and hypothesis-generating, as the study was primarily powered for the clinical endpoint of incident T2DM rather than economic outcomes. To achieve 80% power, we plan a sample size of 252 to detect an estimated 50% reduction in the risk to develop T2DM between both groups, assuming a 30% loss to follow-up during the study.

Interventions

maintenance dose of 1mg SC once weekly

maintenance dose of 1mg SC once weekly

Sponsors

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Lead SponsorOTHER
University Hospital, Antwerp
CollaboratorOTHER
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
CollaboratorOTHER
General Hospital Groeninge
CollaboratorOTHER
Vitaz
CollaboratorOTHER
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege
CollaboratorOTHER
Erasme University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Centre Hospitalier Mouscron
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Jan Yperman Ziekenhuis
CollaboratorOTHER
AZ Turnhout
CollaboratorOTHER
AZ Sint-Lucas Brugge
CollaboratorOTHER
Ziekenhuis aan de Stroom
CollaboratorOTHER
Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Intervention model description

multi-centric double blind RCT

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Eligible participants are women aged ≥18 years, with a history of GDM diagnosed according to the 2013 WHO criteria (at 24-32 weeks gestation or \<24 weeks for early GDM). Participants must have prediabetes diagnosed between 6 weeks and 12 months postpartum according to ADA criteria (FPG 5.6-6.9 mmol/L, 2-hour OGTT glucose 7.8-11.0 mmol/L and/or HbA1c 39-46 mmol/mol \[5.7-6.4%\]). Additional inclusion criteria include cessation of breastfeeding, no intention to become pregnant within the next year, use of effective contraception and no use of medication affecting glucose metabolism. Written ICF is obtained prior to any study-related procedures.

Exclusion criteria

include established diabetes, presence of autoantibodies suggestive of type 1 diabetes, normal glucose tolerance, history of pancreatitis, previous bariatric surgery or planned surgery within two years, unable to understand and speak Dutch, French or English and current pregnant or planning to become pregnant within one year after participating in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Development of T2DMby 160 weeksDefined by FPG, OGTT, and/or HbA1c according to the ADA criteria

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Need for glucose-lowering (rescue) therapyAssessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Percentage need for rescue therapy for diabetes
Frequency of prediabetes based on FPG, OGTT, and/or HbA1cAssessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Percentage of prediabetes based on FPG, OGTT, and/or HbA1c
Regression to normoglycaemiaAssessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Percentage regression to normoglycaemia, based on fasting glycaemia, oral glucose tolerance test and/or HbA1c (ADA criteria)
Change in body weightAssessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Change in body weight (kg)
BMIAssessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Mean BMI (Kg/m2)
Waist circumferenceAssessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Mean waist circumference (cm)
Waist-to-hip ratioAssessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Waist/hip circumference ratio
Proportion of participants achieving ≥5% weight lossAssessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Percentage weight loss ≥5%
Proportion of participants achieving ≥10% weight lossAssessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Percentage weight loss ≥10%
Proportion of participants achieving ≥15% weight lossAssessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Percentage weight loss ≥15%
Body fat percentage assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis (Bodystat 1500®)Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Percentage body fat measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis
β-cell function, assessed by HOMA-BAssessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Beta-cell function measured by the HOMA-B index
Insulinogenic index divided by HOMA-IRAssessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Beta-cell function measured by the by the insulinogenic index divided by HOMA-insulin resistance index
Insulin secretion-sensitivity index-2Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Beta-cell function measured by theby the insulin-secretion sensitivity-2 index
Stumvoll indexAssessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Beta-cell function measured by the Stumvoll index
Insulin sensitivity, assessed by the Matsuda index (reflecting whole body insulin sensitivity)Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Whole body Insulin sensitivity measured by the insulin sensitivity index of Matsuda
1/HOMA-IR, reflecting primarily hepatic insulin sensitivityAssessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)The reciprocal of the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (1/HOMA-IR)
Prevalence of the metabolic syndromeAssessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Percentage of the metabolic syndrome based on the WHO criteria
Blood pressure (blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg)Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Percentage blood pressure ≥140/90mmHg
Heart rateAssessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Mean heart rate
Lipid profile, including low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-cholesterol, ≥100 mg/dL or ≥2,6 mmol/L)Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Percentage LDL cholesterol ≥100mg/dl or ≥2,6 mmol/L
Lipid profile, including triglycerides (≥150 mg/dL or ≥1,7 mmol/L)Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Percentage triglycerides ≥150mg/dl or ≥1,7 mmol/L
Health-related quality of life assessed by SF-36Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Health-related quality of life assessed using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life
Health-related quality of life assessed by EQ-5D-5LAssessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Health-related quality of life assessed using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS). Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better perceived health status
Symptoms of depression (CES-D)Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Depressive symptoms assessed using the 20-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Total scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more depressive symptoms
Symptoms of anxiety (short-form STAI)Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Symptoms of anxiety assessed using the 6-item short-form State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Total scores range from 20 to 80 after score transformation, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety symptoms
Treatment satisfaction assessed using a study-specific questionnaire based on the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction QuestionnaireAssessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Diabetes risk perception assessed using the Diabetes Risk Perception Questionnaire, a validated questionnaire that evaluates perceived risk of developing diabetes
Sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index)Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Sleep quality assessed using the validated Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Food security (short-form HFSSM)Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Food security assessed using the short-form Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM). Scores indicate the level of food security, with higher scores reflecting greater food insecurity
Plasma metabolite concentrationsAssessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Changes in and associations of metabolomic profiles, with cardiometabolic risk and treatment response. Assessed using metabolomic profiling. Blood samples will be collected at baseline and every 6 months during a 3.5-year follow-up period (study visits).
Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), calculated as the area under the curve of health-related quality of life utility values over time, where higher values indicate better health outcomes
Incremental costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of semaglutide compared with placeboAssessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Incremental costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of semaglutide versus placebo
Incremental healthcare costsAssessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)Incremental healthcare costs associated with the intervention compared with control, calculated from collected healthcare resource utilization and unit cost data. Currency (e.g., EUR per participant)

Countries

Belgium

Contacts

CONTACTKatrien Benhalima, MD PhD
katrien.benhalima@uzleuven.be16340614

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 8, 2026