Skip to content

Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty Versus GLP-1 Analogue for Class 1 and 2 Obesity Study

Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty Versus GLP-1 Analogue for Class 1 and 2 Obesity Study (EGG Study)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05569304
Acronym
EGG
Enrollment
66
Registered
2022-10-06
Start date
2022-10-07
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2022-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare the 1-year total body weight loss outcomes for Class 1 and Class 2 Obesity patients who have undergone endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) in contrast to medical treatment with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues.

Detailed description

Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) was developed with the aim of emulating the successful outcomes observed with sleeve gastrectomy, while obviating the need to permanently remove a large portion of the stomach. The recent MERIT trial reported that the estimated total body weight loss after ESG at 1-year was 13.6%, demonstrating superiority over lifestyle modifications alone. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues such as liraglutide or semaglutide are currently approved for the treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Evidence supports the use of these medications in weight loss. The total body weight loss from GLP-1 analogues reportedly range between 7.8-13.8%. As such, for patients with type 1 or 2 obesity who may not be candidates for bariatric surgery, the reported total body weight loss attainable by ESG and GLP-1 analogues appear comparable. In this study, patients eligible and consented for ESG will be retrospectively matched against a group of patients who were previously placed on GLP-1 analogue treatment for class 1 and 2 obesity. The primary outcome of the study will be total body weight loss at 1-year. We will also examine the short-term weight loss outcomes, metabolic outcomes, as well as healthcare costs between the 2 groups. Our hypothesis is that ESG will be non-inferior to GLP-1 analogues in weight loss and metabolic outcomes, with reduced healthcare costs, given the avoidance of repeated dosing.

Interventions

Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty

Sponsors

Sengkang General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with classes 1 (BMI 27.5 to 34.9) and 2 (BMI 35 to 39.9) obesity in accordance with the World Health Organisation recommendations but modified to the interventional thresholds recommended for Asian populations

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with class 3 obesity and above (BMI \> 40.0) * Patients with contraindications to GLP-1 analogues * Patients with contraindications to endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty * Patients with previous bariatric or upper gastrointestinal surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total body weight loss1-yearPercentage total body weight loss

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Short-term weight loss3-monthsPercentage total body weight loss
Healthcare costs1-yearPatient costs associated with procedure, hospital stay, outpatient visits and pharmacological treatment
Metabolic outcomes3-months, 6-months, 9-months, 12-monthsHbA1c values

Countries

Singapore

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026