Skip to content

Debridement and Laser Ablation Versus Debridement Alone in Pilonidal Disease

Debridement and Laser Ablation Versus Debridement Alone in Pilonidal Disease: Retrospective Analysis of Mid-term Outcome

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05569135
Enrollment
121
Registered
2022-10-06
Start date
2018-03-01
Completion date
2022-10-03
Last updated
2022-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pilonidal Disease

Brief summary

This study aims to investigate the effect of laser ablation (LA) in minimally invasive management of pilonidal disease (PD). Data of the patients with PD who were eligible for simple debridement have been prospectively collected since March 2018, when laser ablation treatment came into use in our institution. Laser ablation treatment was offered to all eligible patients. All the patients underwent debridement (removal of hair and/or necrotic tissues through pits using a clamp/curette/brush) of PD; LA was added to the procedure in patients who were willing to have LA. The surgical outcome of two procedures was compared. The primary outcome measure was recurrence at 36 months.

Interventions

A diode-laser that has been reported to be safe and effective in several treatments including pilonidal disease, anal fistula, hemorrhoids, and vascular ablation was used to obtain shrinkage of pilonidal cyst

Sponsors

Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with Class III, IV, and V pilonidal disease according to Tezel Navicular Area Classification * Patients who underwent debridement for pilonidal disease

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with acute abscess (Tezel Class II) * Antibiotic use within 4 weeks before surgery * Patients lost to follow-up at 3,7 and 30 days; 6, 12 and 36 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
disease recurrence at 36 months36 monthsAny ongoing or recurrent sypmtoms were recorded

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complications after the procedure1 monthSafety of the procedure
Incidence of adverse events1 monthSafety of the procedure

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026