Skip to content

A Study on the Immune Response and Safety of a Vaccine Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) When Given Alone or Co-administered With an Adjuvanted Vaccine Against Influenza in Adults Aged 65 Years and Above

A Phase III, Open-label, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-country Study to Evaluate the Immune Response, Safety and Reactogenicity of an RSVPreF3 OA Investigational Vaccine When Co-administered With FLU aQIV (Inactivated Influenza Vaccine - Adjuvanted) in Adults Aged 65 Years and Above

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05568797
Enrollment
1045
Registered
2022-10-06
Start date
2022-10-14
Completion date
2023-07-17
Last updated
2024-09-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections

Keywords

Respiratory syncytial virus, Adjuvanted quadrivalent influenza vaccine, Immunogenicity, Safety, Reactogenicity, Adults aged 65 years and above

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to assess the immunogenicity, safety and reactogenicity of the RSV PreFusion protein 3 older adult (RSVPreF3 OA) investigational vaccine when co-administered with an adjuvanted quadrivalent influenza (FLU aQIV) vaccine, in adults aged 65 years of age (YOA).

Interventions

One dose of RSVPreF3 OA vaccine administered intramuscularly.

BIOLOGICALFLU vaccine

One dose of FLU vaccine administered intramuscularly.

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Participants who, in the opinion of the investigator, can and will comply with the requirements of the protocol (e.g., completion of the electronic diary cards \[eDiaries\], return for follow-up visits, ability to access and utilize a phone or other electronic communications). * A male or female ≥ 65 YOA at the time of the first study intervention administration. * Participants living in the general community or in an assisted-living facility that provides minimal assistance, such that the participant is primarily responsible for self-care and activities of daily living. * Written or witnessed informed consent obtained from the participant prior to performance of any study-specific procedure. * Participants who are medically stable in the opinion of the investigator at the time of first study intervention administration. Participants with chronic stable medical conditions with or without specific treatment, such as diabetes, hypertension or cardiac disease, are allowed to participate in this study if considered by the investigator as medically stable.

Exclusion criteria

Medical conditions * Any confirmed or suspected immunosuppressive or immunodeficient condition resulting from disease or immunosuppressive/cytotoxic therapy, based on medical history and physical examination (no laboratory testing required). * History of any reaction or hypersensitivity likely to be exacerbated by any component of the study interventions, in particular any history of severe allergic reaction to egg protein or to a previous influenza vaccine. * Hypersensitivity to latex. * Guillain-Barré syndrome that occurred within 6 weeks of receipt of prior influenza vaccine. * Serious or unstable chronic illness. * Any history of dementia or any medical condition that moderately or severely impairs cognition. * Recurrent or uncontrolled neurological disorders or seizures. Participants with medically-controlled active or chronic neurological diseases can be enrolled in the study as per investigator assessment, provided that their condition will allow them to comply with the requirements of the protocol. * Significant underlying illness that in the opinion of the investigator would be expected to prevent completion of the study. * Any medical condition that in the judgment of the investigator would make intramuscular injection unsafe. Prior/Concomitant therapy * Use of any investigational or non-registered product (drug, vaccine, or medical device) other than the study interventions during the period beginning 30 days before the first dose of study interventions, or planned use during the study period. * Administration of an influenza vaccine during the 6 months preceding the study FLU vaccine administration. * Planned or actual administration of a vaccine not foreseen by the study protocol in the period starting 30 days before the first study intervention administration and ending 30 days after the last study intervention administration. In the case of COVID-19 vaccines, this time window can be decreased to 14 days before and after each study intervention administration provided this COVID-19 vaccine use is in line with local governmental recommendations. * Previous vaccination with an RSV vaccine. * Administration of long-acting immune-modifying drugs or planned administration at any time during the study period. * Administration of immunoglobulins and/or any blood products or plasma derivatives during the period starting 90 days before the administration of first dose of study interventions or planned administration during the study period. * Chronic administration (defined as more than 14 consecutive days in total) of immunosuppressants or other immune-modifying drugs during the period starting 90 days prior to the first study intervention dose or planned administration during the study period. For corticosteroids, this will mean prednisone ≥ 20 mg/day, or equivalent. Inhaled and topical steroids are allowed. Prior/Concurrent clinical study experience • Concurrently participating in another clinical study, at any time during the study period, in which the participant has been or will be exposed to an investigational or a non-investigational vaccine/product (drug or invasive medical device). Other exclusions * History of chronic alcohol consumption and/or drug abuse as deemed by the investigator to render the potential participant unable/unlikely to provide accurate safety reports or comply with study procedures. * Bedridden participants. * Planned move during the study conduct that prohibits participation until study end. * Participation of any study personnel or their immediate dependents, family, or household members.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Titers for Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibodies Against 4 FLU Vaccine Strains Expressed as Group Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) at 1 Month After FLU Vaccine DoseAt 1 month after the FLU vaccine dose (Day 31 for both groups)HI antibodies assessed were antibodies against the Flu A/Darwin/6/2021 H3N2, Flu A/Victoria/2570/2019 H1N1, Flu B/Austria/1359417/2021 Victoria, and Flu B/Phuket/3073/2013 Yamagata flu strains.
RSV-A Neutralizing Antibody Titers Expressed as GMTsAt 1 month after the RSVPreF3 OA dose (Day 31 for the Co-Ad Group and Day 61 for the Control Group)RSV-A neutralizing antibodies were given as GMTs and expressed as Estimated Dilution 60 (ED60).
RSV-B Neutralizing Antibody Titers Expressed as GMTsAt 1 month after the RSVPreF3 OA dose (Day 31 for the CoAd Group and Day 61 for the Control Group)RSV B neutralizing antibodies are given as GMTs and expressed as Estimated Dilution 60 (ED60).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Titers for HI Antibodies Against 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsAt Day 1 (Baseline) and Day 31HI antibodies assessed were antibodies against the Flu A/Darwin/6/2021 H3N2, Flu A/Victoria/2570/2019 H1N1, Flu B/Austria/1359417/2021 Victoria, and Flu B/Phuket/3073/2013 Yamagata flu strains. HI antibodies were expressed as GMT, in titers.
HI Seroprotection Rate (SPR) for 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsAt Day 1 (Baseline) and Day 31SPR for HI antibody was defined as the percentage of participants with a serum HI titer \>= 1:40. The assessed Flu strains were: Flu A/Darwin/6/2021 H3N2, Flu A/Victoria/2570/2019 H1N1, Flu B/Austria/1359417/2021 Victoria, and Flu B/Phuket/3073/2013 Yamagata.
HI Antibody Titers for 4 FLU Vaccine Strains Expressed as MGIAt 1 month after the FLU dose (Day 31 for both groups) compared to pre-vaccination (Day 1 for both groups)MGI was defined as the geometric mean of the within-participant ratios of the post-dose titer over the pre-dose titer. The assessed Flu strains were: Flu A/Darwin/6/2021 H3N2, Flu A/Victoria/2570/2019 H1N1, Flu B/Austria/1359417/2021 Victoria, and Flu B/Phuket/3073/2013 Yamagata.
Percentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Administration Site Event After Each Vaccine Dose AdministrationWithin 7 days (the day of vaccination and 6 subsequent days) after each vaccine administration (vaccines administered at Day 1 for CoAd Group and at Day 1 and Day 31 for Control group)The solicited administration site events after vaccination include erythema, pain and swelling.
HI Seroconversion Rate (SCR) for 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsAt 1 month after the FLU vaccine dose (Day 31 for both groups)SCR for HI antibody is defined as the percentage of participants who have either a HI predose titer less than (\<) 1:10 and a post-dose titer greater than or equal to (\>=) 1:40, or a pre-dose titer \>= 1:10 and at least a 4-fold increase in post-dose titer. The assessed Flu strains were: Flu A/Darwin/6/2021 H3N2, Flu A/Victoria/2570/2019 H1N1, Flu B/Austria/1359417/2021 Victoria, and Flu B/Phuket/3073/2013 Yamagata.
Percentage of Participants Reporting Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs)Within 30 days (the day of vaccination and 29 subsequent days) after each vaccine administrationAn unsolicited AEs is an AE that is not included in a list of solicited events using a Participant Electronic Diary. Unsolicited events must be spontaneously communicated by a participant who signs the informed consent. Unsolicited AEs include both serious, non-serious AEs and potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs).
Percentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAEs)From Day 1 until 6 months after last vaccination (Month 6 for the Co-Ad Group, Month 7 for the Control group)An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, or results in disability/incapacity or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a study participant.
Percentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Potential Immune-mediated Disease (pIMDs)From Day 1 until 6 months after last vaccination (Month 6 for the Co-Ad Group, Month 7 for the Control group)pIMDs are a subset of AEs of special interest that include autoimmune diseases and other inflammatory and/or neurologic disorders of interest which may or may not have an autoimmune etiology. The investigator must exercise his/her medical/scientific judgment to determine whether other diseases have an autoimmune origin (i.e., pathophysiology involving systemic or organ-specific pathogenic autoantibodies) and should also be recorded as a pIMD.
Percentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Systemic Event After Each Dose AdministrationWithin 7 days (the day of vaccination and 6 subsequent days) after each vaccine administration (vaccines administered at Day 1 and Day 31 for C-oAd Group and at Day 1 and Day 31 for Control group)The solicited systemic events after vaccination include fever, headache, fatigue, myalgia and arthralgia.
RSV-A Neutralization Antibody Titers Expressed as Mean Geometric Increase (MGI)At 1 month after the RSVPreF3 OA vaccine dose (Day 31 for the Co-Ad Group and Day 61 for the Control Group) compared to pre-vaccination (Day 1 for Co-Ad group and Day 31 for Control group)MGI was defined as the geometric mean of the within-participant ratios of the post-dose titer over the pre-dose titer.
RSV-B Neutralization Antibody Titers Expressed as MGIAt 1 month after the RSVPreF3 OA vaccine dose (Day 31 for the Co-Ad Group and Day 61 for the Control Group) compared to pre-vaccination (Day 1 for Co-Ad group and Day 31 for Control group)MGI was defined as the geometric mean of the within-participant ratios of the post-dose titer over the pre-dose titer.

Countries

Belgium, Finland, France, Spain, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

All 1045 enrolled participants were randomized to Co-Ad and Control Groups and received at least 1 dose of study intervention and were included in the exposed set.

Pre-assignment details

This study assessed the immunogenicity, safety and reactogenicity of the RSVPre3 OA vaccine when co-administered with an adjuvanted quadrivalent influenza (FLU-aQIV \[FLU\]) vaccine, in adults aged 65 years old or above.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Co-Ad Group
Participants received one dose of FLU-aQIV vaccine and one dose of RSVPreF3 OA vaccine, both doses administered at Day 1, and were followed until end of study.
523
Control Group
Participants received one dose of FLU-aQIV vaccine at Day 1, followed by one dose of RSVPreF3 OA vaccine at Day 31, and were followed until end of study.
522
Total1,045

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event08
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up23
Overall StudyOther22
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject110

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl GroupTotalCo-Ad Group
Age, Continuous72.2 YEARS
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2
72.2 YEARS
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3
72.1 YEARS
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other - Unspecified
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
516 Participants1038 Participants522 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
275 Participants530 Participants255 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
247 Participants515 Participants268 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 5236 / 522
other
Total, other adverse events
427 / 523428 / 522
serious
Total, serious adverse events
21 / 52336 / 522

Outcome results

Primary

RSV-A Neutralizing Antibody Titers Expressed as GMTs

RSV-A neutralizing antibodies were given as GMTs and expressed as Estimated Dilution 60 (ED60).

Time frame: At 1 month after the RSVPreF3 OA dose (Day 31 for the Co-Ad Group and Day 61 for the Control Group)

Population: Analysis was performed on Per Protocol Set for RSV OA analysis which included eligible participants who: received at least one control group intervention or all Co-Ad group interventions, had pre- and post-dose immunogenicity results, adhered to specified blood draw intervals, with immunogenicity data available for the specified analysis at the specified time point post-RSVPreF3 OA vaccine dose, who lacked interfering medical conditions and avoided prohibited concomitant medication/vaccination.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Co-Ad GroupRSV-A Neutralizing Antibody Titers Expressed as GMTs6673.4 Titers
Control GroupRSV-A Neutralizing Antibody Titers Expressed as GMTs6591.8 Titers
Comparison: To demonstrate the non-inferiority of the RSVPreF3 OA vaccine when co-administered with the FLU vaccine compared to the RSVPreF3 OA vaccine administered alone, in terms of RSV-A neutralizing antibody titers, at 1 month after the RSVPreF3 OA vaccine dose (Day 31 for the Co-Ad Group and Day 61 for the Control Group).0.95% CI: [0.87, 1.12]
Primary

RSV-B Neutralizing Antibody Titers Expressed as GMTs

RSV B neutralizing antibodies are given as GMTs and expressed as Estimated Dilution 60 (ED60).

Time frame: At 1 month after the RSVPreF3 OA dose (Day 31 for the CoAd Group and Day 61 for the Control Group)

Population: Analysis was performed on Per Protocol Set for RSV OA analysis which included eligible participants who: received at least one control group intervention or all Co-Ad group interventions, had pre- and post-dose immunogenicity results, adhered to specified blood draw intervals, with immunogenicity data available for the specified analysis at the specified time point post-RSVPreF3 OA vaccine dose, who lacked interfering medical conditions and avoided prohibited concomitant medication/vaccination.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Co-Ad GroupRSV-B Neutralizing Antibody Titers Expressed as GMTs7880.1 Titers
Control GroupRSV-B Neutralizing Antibody Titers Expressed as GMTs9134.1 Titers
Comparison: To demonstrate the non-inferiority of the RSVPreF3 OA vaccine when co-administered with the FLU vaccine compared to the RSVPreF3 OA vaccine administered alone, in terms of RSV-B neutralizing antibody titers, at 1 month after the RSVPreF3 OA vaccine dose (Day 31 for the CoAd Group and Day 61 for the Control Group).0.95% CI: [1.03, 1.3]
Primary

Titers for Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibodies Against 4 FLU Vaccine Strains Expressed as Group Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) at 1 Month After FLU Vaccine Dose

HI antibodies assessed were antibodies against the Flu A/Darwin/6/2021 H3N2, Flu A/Victoria/2570/2019 H1N1, Flu B/Austria/1359417/2021 Victoria, and Flu B/Phuket/3073/2013 Yamagata flu strains.

Time frame: At 1 month after the FLU vaccine dose (Day 31 for both groups)

Population: Analysis was performed on Per Protocol Set for FLU analysis which included eligible participants who: received at least one control group intervention or all Co-Ad group interventions, had pre- and post-dose immunogenicity results, adhered to specified blood draw intervals, with immunogenicity data available for the specified analysis at the specified time point post-FLU vaccine dose, who lacked interfering medical conditions and avoided prohibited concomitant medication/vaccination.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Co-Ad GroupTiters for Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibodies Against 4 FLU Vaccine Strains Expressed as Group Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) at 1 Month After FLU Vaccine DoseFlu A/Darwin/6/2021 H3N243.8 Titers
Co-Ad GroupTiters for Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibodies Against 4 FLU Vaccine Strains Expressed as Group Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) at 1 Month After FLU Vaccine DoseFlu A/Victoria/2570/2019 H1N1143.0 Titers
Co-Ad GroupTiters for Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibodies Against 4 FLU Vaccine Strains Expressed as Group Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) at 1 Month After FLU Vaccine DoseFlu B/Austria/1359417/2021 Victoria613.9 Titers
Co-Ad GroupTiters for Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibodies Against 4 FLU Vaccine Strains Expressed as Group Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) at 1 Month After FLU Vaccine DoseFlu B/Phuket/3073/2013 Yamagata406.2 Titers
Control GroupTiters for Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibodies Against 4 FLU Vaccine Strains Expressed as Group Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) at 1 Month After FLU Vaccine DoseFlu B/Phuket/3073/2013 Yamagata421.0 Titers
Control GroupTiters for Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibodies Against 4 FLU Vaccine Strains Expressed as Group Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) at 1 Month After FLU Vaccine DoseFlu A/Darwin/6/2021 H3N257.7 Titers
Control GroupTiters for Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibodies Against 4 FLU Vaccine Strains Expressed as Group Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) at 1 Month After FLU Vaccine DoseFlu B/Austria/1359417/2021 Victoria597.5 Titers
Control GroupTiters for Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibodies Against 4 FLU Vaccine Strains Expressed as Group Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) at 1 Month After FLU Vaccine DoseFlu A/Victoria/2570/2019 H1N1148.5 Titers
Comparison: To demonstrate the non-inferiority of the FLU vaccine when co administered with the RSVPreF3 OA vaccine compared to the FLU vaccine administered alone, in terms of HI GMTs against the Flu A/Darwin/6/2021 H3N2 strain, at 1 month post-FLU vaccine dose administration (Day 31 for both groups).0.95% CI: [1.13, 1.53]
Comparison: To demonstrate the non-inferiority of the FLU vaccine when co administered with the RSVPreF3 OA vaccine compared to the FLU vaccine administered alone, in terms of HI GMTs against the Flu A/Victoria/2570/2019 H1N1 influenza strain included in the FLU vaccine, at 1 month post-FLU vaccine dose administration (Day 31 for both groups).0.95% CI: [0.91, 1.18]
Comparison: To demonstrate the non-inferiority of the FLU vaccine when co administered with the RSVPreF3 OA vaccine compared to the FLU vaccine administered alone, in terms of HI GMTs against the Flu B/Austria/1359417/2021 influenza strain included in the FLU vaccine, at 1 month post-FLU vaccine dose administration (Day 31 for both groups).0.95% CI: [0.9, 1.06]
Comparison: To demonstrate the non-inferiority of the FLU vaccine when co administered with the RSVPreF3 OA vaccine compared to the Flu vaccine administered alone, in terms of HI GMTs against the Flu B/Phuket/3073/2013 Yamagata influenza strain included in the FLU vaccine, at 1 month post-FLU vaccine dose administration (Day 31 for both groups).0.95% CI: [0.95, 1.13]
Secondary

HI Antibody Titers for 4 FLU Vaccine Strains Expressed as MGI

MGI was defined as the geometric mean of the within-participant ratios of the post-dose titer over the pre-dose titer. The assessed Flu strains were: Flu A/Darwin/6/2021 H3N2, Flu A/Victoria/2570/2019 H1N1, Flu B/Austria/1359417/2021 Victoria, and Flu B/Phuket/3073/2013 Yamagata.

Time frame: At 1 month after the FLU dose (Day 31 for both groups) compared to pre-vaccination (Day 1 for both groups)

Population: Analysis was performed on Per Protocol Set for FLU analysis which included eligible participants who: received at least one control group intervention or all Co-Ad group interventions, had pre- and post-dose immunogenicity results, adhered to specified blood draw intervals, with immunogenicity data available for the specified analysis at the specified time point post-FLU vaccine dose, who lacked interfering medical conditions and avoided prohibited concomitant medication/vaccination.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Co-Ad GroupHI Antibody Titers for 4 FLU Vaccine Strains Expressed as MGIFlu B/Phuket/3073/2013 Yamagata HI1.94 Ratio
Co-Ad GroupHI Antibody Titers for 4 FLU Vaccine Strains Expressed as MGIFlu A/Victoria/2570/2019 H1N1 HI3.85 Ratio
Co-Ad GroupHI Antibody Titers for 4 FLU Vaccine Strains Expressed as MGIFlu B/Austria/1359417/2021 Victoria HI1.89 Ratio
Co-Ad GroupHI Antibody Titers for 4 FLU Vaccine Strains Expressed as MGIFlu A/Darwin/6/2021 H3N2 HI5.10 Ratio
Control GroupHI Antibody Titers for 4 FLU Vaccine Strains Expressed as MGIFlu B/Austria/1359417/2021 Victoria HI1.84 Ratio
Control GroupHI Antibody Titers for 4 FLU Vaccine Strains Expressed as MGIFlu A/Darwin/6/2021 H3N2 HI6.87 Ratio
Control GroupHI Antibody Titers for 4 FLU Vaccine Strains Expressed as MGIFlu B/Phuket/3073/2013 Yamagata HI2.11 Ratio
Control GroupHI Antibody Titers for 4 FLU Vaccine Strains Expressed as MGIFlu A/Victoria/2570/2019 H1N1 HI3.79 Ratio
Secondary

HI Seroconversion Rate (SCR) for 4 FLU Vaccine Strains

SCR for HI antibody is defined as the percentage of participants who have either a HI predose titer less than (\<) 1:10 and a post-dose titer greater than or equal to (\>=) 1:40, or a pre-dose titer \>= 1:10 and at least a 4-fold increase in post-dose titer. The assessed Flu strains were: Flu A/Darwin/6/2021 H3N2, Flu A/Victoria/2570/2019 H1N1, Flu B/Austria/1359417/2021 Victoria, and Flu B/Phuket/3073/2013 Yamagata.

Time frame: At 1 month after the FLU vaccine dose (Day 31 for both groups)

Population: Analysis was performed on Per Protocol Set for FLU analysis which included eligible participants who: received at least one control group intervention or all Co-Ad group interventions, had pre- and post-dose immunogenicity results, adhered to specified blood draw intervals, with immunogenicity data available for the specified analysis at the specified time point post-FLU vaccine dose, who lacked interfering medical conditions and avoided prohibited concomitant medication/vaccination.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Co-Ad GroupHI Seroconversion Rate (SCR) for 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu A/Darwin/6/2021 H3N251.7 Percentage of participants
Co-Ad GroupHI Seroconversion Rate (SCR) for 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu A/Victoria/2570/2019 H1N144.0 Percentage of participants
Co-Ad GroupHI Seroconversion Rate (SCR) for 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu B/Austria/1359417/2021 Victoria17.2 Percentage of participants
Co-Ad GroupHI Seroconversion Rate (SCR) for 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu B/Phuket/3073/2013 Yamagata18.5 Percentage of participants
Control GroupHI Seroconversion Rate (SCR) for 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu B/Phuket/3073/2013 Yamagata19.3 Percentage of participants
Control GroupHI Seroconversion Rate (SCR) for 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu A/Darwin/6/2021 H3N262.0 Percentage of participants
Control GroupHI Seroconversion Rate (SCR) for 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu B/Austria/1359417/2021 Victoria17.5 Percentage of participants
Control GroupHI Seroconversion Rate (SCR) for 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu A/Victoria/2570/2019 H1N145.7 Percentage of participants
Comparison: To evaluate the non-inferiority of the FLU vaccine when co-administered with the RSVPreF3 OA vaccine compared to the FLU vaccine administered alone as measured by the difference of percentage of participants achieving seroconversion for HI antibody titers against Flu A/Darwin/6/2021 H3N2 strain at 1 month post-FLU vaccine dose administration (Day 31 for both groups).0.95% CI: [3.5, 16.9]
Comparison: To evaluate the non-inferiority of the FLU vaccine when co-administered with the RSVPreF3 OA vaccine compared to the FLU vaccine administered alone as measured by the difference of percentage of participants achieving seroconversion for HI antibody titers against Flu A/Victoria/2570/2019 H1N1 strain at 1 month post-FLU vaccine dose administration (Day 31 for both groups).0.95% CI: [-5.16, 8.47]
Comparison: To evaluate the non-inferiority of the FLU vaccine when co-administered with the RSVPreF3 OA vaccine compared to the FLU vaccine administered alone as measured by the difference of percentage of participants achieving seroconversion for HI antibody titers against Flu B/Austria/1359417/2021 Victoria at 1 month post-FLU vaccine dose administration (Day 31 for both groups).0.95% CI: [-4.92, 5.46]
Comparison: To evaluate the non-inferiority of the FLU vaccine when co-administered with the RSVPreF3 OA vaccine compared to the FLU vaccine administered alone as measured by the difference of percentage of participants achieving seroconversion for HI antibody titers against Flu B/Phuket/3073/2013 Yamagata strain at 1 month post-FLU vaccine dose administration (Day 31 for both groups).0.95% CI: [-4.54, 6.17]
Secondary

HI Seroprotection Rate (SPR) for 4 FLU Vaccine Strains

SPR for HI antibody was defined as the percentage of participants with a serum HI titer \>= 1:40. The assessed Flu strains were: Flu A/Darwin/6/2021 H3N2, Flu A/Victoria/2570/2019 H1N1, Flu B/Austria/1359417/2021 Victoria, and Flu B/Phuket/3073/2013 Yamagata.

Time frame: At Day 1 (Baseline) and Day 31

Population: Analysis was performed on Per Protocol Set for FLU analysis which included eligible participants who: received at least one control group intervention or all Co-Ad group interventions, had pre- and post-dose immunogenicity results, adhered to specified blood draw intervals, with immunogenicity data available for the specified analysis at the specified time point post-FLU vaccine dose, who lacked interfering medical conditions and avoided prohibited concomitant medication/vaccination.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Co-Ad GroupHI Seroprotection Rate (SPR) for 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu A/Darwin/6/2021 H3N2, Day 110.4 Percentage of participants
Co-Ad GroupHI Seroprotection Rate (SPR) for 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu A/Darwin/6/2021 H3N2, Day 3163.6 Percentage of participants
Co-Ad GroupHI Seroprotection Rate (SPR) for 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu A/Victoria/2570/2019 H1N1, Day 160.0 Percentage of participants
Co-Ad GroupHI Seroprotection Rate (SPR) for 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu A/Victoria/2570/2019 H1N1, Day 3192.0 Percentage of participants
Co-Ad GroupHI Seroprotection Rate (SPR) for 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu B/Austria/1359417/2021 Victoria, Day 199.6 Percentage of participants
Co-Ad GroupHI Seroprotection Rate (SPR) for 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu B/Austria/1359417/2021 Victoria, Day 31100 Percentage of participants
Co-Ad GroupHI Seroprotection Rate (SPR) for 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu B/Phuket/3073/2013 Yamagata, Day 199.8 Percentage of participants
Co-Ad GroupHI Seroprotection Rate (SPR) for 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu B/Phuket/3073/2013 Yamagata, Day 31100 Percentage of participants
Control GroupHI Seroprotection Rate (SPR) for 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu B/Phuket/3073/2013 Yamagata, Day 31100 Percentage of participants
Control GroupHI Seroprotection Rate (SPR) for 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu A/Darwin/6/2021 H3N2, Day 110.7 Percentage of participants
Control GroupHI Seroprotection Rate (SPR) for 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu B/Austria/1359417/2021 Victoria, Day 1100 Percentage of participants
Control GroupHI Seroprotection Rate (SPR) for 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu A/Darwin/6/2021 H3N2, Day 3171.0 Percentage of participants
Control GroupHI Seroprotection Rate (SPR) for 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu B/Phuket/3073/2013 Yamagata, Day 198.9 Percentage of participants
Control GroupHI Seroprotection Rate (SPR) for 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu A/Victoria/2570/2019 H1N1, Day 164.3 Percentage of participants
Control GroupHI Seroprotection Rate (SPR) for 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu B/Austria/1359417/2021 Victoria, Day 31100 Percentage of participants
Control GroupHI Seroprotection Rate (SPR) for 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu A/Victoria/2570/2019 H1N1, Day 3195.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Potential Immune-mediated Disease (pIMDs)

pIMDs are a subset of AEs of special interest that include autoimmune diseases and other inflammatory and/or neurologic disorders of interest which may or may not have an autoimmune etiology. The investigator must exercise his/her medical/scientific judgment to determine whether other diseases have an autoimmune origin (i.e., pathophysiology involving systemic or organ-specific pathogenic autoantibodies) and should also be recorded as a pIMD.

Time frame: From Day 1 until 6 months after last vaccination (Month 6 for the Co-Ad Group, Month 7 for the Control group)

Population: Analysis was performed on Exposed set which included participants who received at least a study intervention and had data for the assessed timepoint and analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Co-Ad GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Potential Immune-mediated Disease (pIMDs)0 Percentage of participants
Control GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Potential Immune-mediated Disease (pIMDs)0.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAEs)

An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, or results in disability/incapacity or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a study participant.

Time frame: From Day 1 until 6 months after last vaccination (Month 6 for the Co-Ad Group, Month 7 for the Control group)

Population: Analysis was performed on Exposed set which included participants who received at least a study intervention and had data for the assessed timepoint and analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Co-Ad GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAEs)4.0 Percentage of participants
Control GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAEs)6.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Administration Site Event After Each Vaccine Dose Administration

The solicited administration site events after vaccination include erythema, pain and swelling.

Time frame: Within 7 days (the day of vaccination and 6 subsequent days) after each vaccine administration (vaccines administered at Day 1 for CoAd Group and at Day 1 and Day 31 for Control group)

Population: Analysis was performed on Exposed set which included participants who received a study intervention and with the electronic diary completed post-each vaccination and for whom solicited administration event data was available for specific visit. The Control group received FLU vaccination at Day 1 and RSVPreF3 OA vaccination at Day 31; Co-Ad group received co-administered vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA + FLU) on Day 1. Analysis per group is based on the study intervention administered on specific visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Co-Ad GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Administration Site Event After Each Vaccine Dose AdministrationErythema, FLU dose given at Day 16.6 Percentage of participants
Co-Ad GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Administration Site Event After Each Vaccine Dose AdministrationErythema, RSV dose given at Day 114.1 Percentage of participants
Co-Ad GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Administration Site Event After Each Vaccine Dose AdministrationPain, FLU dose given at Day 151.7 Percentage of participants
Co-Ad GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Administration Site Event After Each Vaccine Dose AdministrationPain, RSV dose given at Day 166.1 Percentage of participants
Co-Ad GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Administration Site Event After Each Vaccine Dose AdministrationSwelling, RSV dose given at Day 110.5 Percentage of participants
Co-Ad GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Administration Site Event After Each Vaccine Dose AdministrationSwelling, FLU dose given at Day 15.2 Percentage of participants
Control GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Administration Site Event After Each Vaccine Dose AdministrationSwelling, RSV dose given at Day 318.4 Percentage of participants
Control GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Administration Site Event After Each Vaccine Dose AdministrationErythema, FLU dose given at Day 15.3 Percentage of participants
Control GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Administration Site Event After Each Vaccine Dose AdministrationPain, RSV dose given at Day 3158.8 Percentage of participants
Control GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Administration Site Event After Each Vaccine Dose AdministrationErythema, RSV dose given at Day 3112.4 Percentage of participants
Control GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Administration Site Event After Each Vaccine Dose AdministrationSwelling, FLU dose given at Day 16.0 Percentage of participants
Control GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Administration Site Event After Each Vaccine Dose AdministrationPain, FLU dose given at Day 144.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Systemic Event After Each Dose Administration

The solicited systemic events after vaccination include fever, headache, fatigue, myalgia and arthralgia.

Time frame: Within 7 days (the day of vaccination and 6 subsequent days) after each vaccine administration (vaccines administered at Day 1 and Day 31 for C-oAd Group and at Day 1 and Day 31 for Control group)

Population: Analysis was performed on Exposed set which included participants who received a study intervention and with the electronic diary completed post-each vaccination and for whom solicited administration event data was available for specific visit. The Control group received FLU vaccination at Day 1 and RSVPreF3 OA vaccination at Day 31; Co-Ad group received co-administered vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA + FLU) on Day 1. Analysis per group is based on the study intervention administered on specific visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Co-Ad GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Systemic Event After Each Dose AdministrationFatigue, Dosing at Day 145.7 Percentage of participants
Co-Ad GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Systemic Event After Each Dose AdministrationFever, Dosing at Day 12.1 Percentage of participants
Co-Ad GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Systemic Event After Each Dose AdministrationMyalgia, Dosing at Day 139.0 Percentage of participants
Co-Ad GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Systemic Event After Each Dose AdministrationHeadache, Dosing at Day 132.2 Percentage of participants
Co-Ad GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Systemic Event After Each Dose AdministrationArthralgia, Dosing at Day 125.8 Percentage of participants
Control GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Systemic Event After Each Dose AdministrationFever, Dosing at Day 10.6 Percentage of participants
Control GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Systemic Event After Each Dose AdministrationFever, Dosing at Day 311.1 Percentage of participants
Control GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Systemic Event After Each Dose AdministrationHeadache, Dosing at Day 119.3 Percentage of participants
Control GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Systemic Event After Each Dose AdministrationHeadache, Dosing at Day 3123.9 Percentage of participants
Control GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Systemic Event After Each Dose AdministrationMyalgia, Dosing at Day 123.0 Percentage of participants
Control GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Systemic Event After Each Dose AdministrationMyalgia, Dosing at Day 3131.9 Percentage of participants
Control GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Systemic Event After Each Dose AdministrationArthralgia, Dosing at Day 115.6 Percentage of participants
Control GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Systemic Event After Each Dose AdministrationArthralgia, Dosing at Day 3117.1 Percentage of participants
Control GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Systemic Event After Each Dose AdministrationFatigue, Dosing at Day 128.5 Percentage of participants
Control GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting Each Solicited Systemic Event After Each Dose AdministrationFatigue, Dosing at Day 3130.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Reporting Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs)

An unsolicited AEs is an AE that is not included in a list of solicited events using a Participant Electronic Diary. Unsolicited events must be spontaneously communicated by a participant who signs the informed consent. Unsolicited AEs include both serious, non-serious AEs and potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs).

Time frame: Within 30 days (the day of vaccination and 29 subsequent days) after each vaccine administration

Population: Analysis was performed on Exposed set which included participants who received at least a study intervention and had data for the assessed timepoint and analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Co-Ad GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs)13.6 Percentage of participants
Control GroupPercentage of Participants Reporting Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs)24.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

RSV-A Neutralization Antibody Titers Expressed as Mean Geometric Increase (MGI)

MGI was defined as the geometric mean of the within-participant ratios of the post-dose titer over the pre-dose titer.

Time frame: At 1 month after the RSVPreF3 OA vaccine dose (Day 31 for the Co-Ad Group and Day 61 for the Control Group) compared to pre-vaccination (Day 1 for Co-Ad group and Day 31 for Control group)

Population: Analysis was performed on Per Protocol Set for RSV OA analysis which included eligible participants who: received at least one control group intervention or all Co-Ad group interventions, had pre- and post-dose immunogenicity results, adhered to specified blood draw intervals, with immunogenicity data available for the specified analysis at the specified time point post-RSVPreF3 OA vaccine dose, who lacked interfering medical conditions and avoided prohibited concomitant medication/vaccination.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Co-Ad GroupRSV-A Neutralization Antibody Titers Expressed as Mean Geometric Increase (MGI)8.50 Ratio
Control GroupRSV-A Neutralization Antibody Titers Expressed as Mean Geometric Increase (MGI)7.58 Ratio
Secondary

RSV-B Neutralization Antibody Titers Expressed as MGI

MGI was defined as the geometric mean of the within-participant ratios of the post-dose titer over the pre-dose titer.

Time frame: At 1 month after the RSVPreF3 OA vaccine dose (Day 31 for the Co-Ad Group and Day 61 for the Control Group) compared to pre-vaccination (Day 1 for Co-Ad group and Day 31 for Control group)

Population: Analysis was performed on Per Protocol Set for RSV OA analysis which included eligible participants who: received at least one control group intervention or all Co-Ad group interventions, had pre- and post-dose immunogenicity results, adhered to specified blood draw intervals, with immunogenicity data available for the specified analysis at the specified time point post-RSVPreF3 OA vaccine dose, who lacked interfering medical conditions and avoided prohibited concomitant medication/vaccination.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Co-Ad GroupRSV-B Neutralization Antibody Titers Expressed as MGI7.11 Ratio
Control GroupRSV-B Neutralization Antibody Titers Expressed as MGI7.46 Ratio
Secondary

Titers for HI Antibodies Against 4 FLU Vaccine Strains

HI antibodies assessed were antibodies against the Flu A/Darwin/6/2021 H3N2, Flu A/Victoria/2570/2019 H1N1, Flu B/Austria/1359417/2021 Victoria, and Flu B/Phuket/3073/2013 Yamagata flu strains. HI antibodies were expressed as GMT, in titers.

Time frame: At Day 1 (Baseline) and Day 31

Population: Analysis was performed on Per Protocol Set for FLU analysis which included eligible participants who: received at least one control group intervention or all Co-Ad group interventions, had pre- and post-dose immunogenicity results, adhered to specified blood draw intervals, with immunogenicity data available for the specified analysis at the specified time point post-FLU vaccine dose, who lacked interfering medical conditions and avoided prohibited concomitant medication/vaccination.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Co-Ad GroupTiters for HI Antibodies Against 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu A/Darwin/6/2021 H3N2, Day 19.1 Titers
Co-Ad GroupTiters for HI Antibodies Against 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu B/Austria/1359417/2021 Victoria, Day 1323.6 Titers
Co-Ad GroupTiters for HI Antibodies Against 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu A/Victoria/2570/2019 H1N1, Day 140.0 Titers
Co-Ad GroupTiters for HI Antibodies Against 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu B/Austria/1359417/2021 Victoria, Day 31614.9 Titers
Co-Ad GroupTiters for HI Antibodies Against 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu A/Darwin/6/2021 H3N2 , Day 3145.3 Titers
Co-Ad GroupTiters for HI Antibodies Against 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu B/Phuket/3073/2013 Yamagata, Day 1213.1 Titers
Co-Ad GroupTiters for HI Antibodies Against 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu B/Phuket/3073/2013 Yamagata, Day 31423.0 Titers
Co-Ad GroupTiters for HI Antibodies Against 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu A/Victoria/2570/2019 H1N1, Day 31151.0 Titers
Control GroupTiters for HI Antibodies Against 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu B/Phuket/3073/2013 Yamagata, Day 31417.5 Titers
Control GroupTiters for HI Antibodies Against 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu A/Darwin/6/2021 H3N2, Day 18.7 Titers
Control GroupTiters for HI Antibodies Against 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu A/Darwin/6/2021 H3N2 , Day 3158.3 Titers
Control GroupTiters for HI Antibodies Against 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu A/Victoria/2570/2019 H1N1, Day 143.2 Titers
Control GroupTiters for HI Antibodies Against 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu A/Victoria/2570/2019 H1N1, Day 31163.8 Titers
Control GroupTiters for HI Antibodies Against 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu B/Austria/1359417/2021 Victoria, Day 1327.2 Titers
Control GroupTiters for HI Antibodies Against 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu B/Austria/1359417/2021 Victoria, Day 31608.1 Titers
Control GroupTiters for HI Antibodies Against 4 FLU Vaccine StrainsFlu B/Phuket/3073/2013 Yamagata, Day 1193.2 Titers

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026