Skip to content

Changes in QoL and Symptoms in Patients With Polycythemia Vera Receiving Ruxo in a Routine Clinical Practice

Changes in Quality of Life (QoL) and Symptoms in Patients With Polycythemia Vera (PV) Receiving Ruxolitinib (Ruxo) in a Routine Clinical Practice

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05566535
Acronym
QoL-PV-R
Enrollment
32
Registered
2022-10-04
Start date
2022-10-01
Completion date
2024-08-01
Last updated
2022-10-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Polycythemia Vera

Keywords

ruxolitinib, quality of life

Brief summary

The purpose of this multicenter observational prospective cohort study is to examine changes in QoL and symptoms in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) during treatment with ruxolitinib (Ruxo), and to evaluate efficacy and safety of Ruxo in a real-world setting

Interventions

DRUGRuxolitinib

Ruxo will be administered to patients with PV in a real-world setting. Treatment with Ruxo is according to local approved label. Ruxo treatment should be administered according to drug official instruction and in compliance with clinical practice at the certain medical center.

Sponsors

Multinational Center for Quality of Life Research, Russia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who have confirmed diagnosis of PV * Patients whose age - 18 years and older * Patients who signed informed consent * Patients who able to fill out questionnaires

Exclusion criteria

* Patients enrolled in clinical trials * Patients with contraindications to Ruxo in accordance with instruction for use

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in QoL as per SF-36 questionnaire domains at 3 and 9 months of Ruxo treatmentBaseline, 3 and 9 months of Ruxo treatmentThe difference in QoL means of SF-36 domains at 3 and 9 months as compared to their Baseline will be analyzed

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in severity of each symptom by MPN10 over timeBaseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of Ruxo treatmentThe difference in MPN10 symptom score means at different time-points of Ruxo treatment as compared to their Baseline will be analyzed
Percentage of patients achieving a ≥ 50% improvement from Baseline in MPN10 Total Symptom Score over time1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of Ruxo treatmentThe number of patients with MPN10 Total Symptom Score decrease ≥ 50% at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of Ruxo treatment as compared to its' Baseline will be calculated
Change From Baseline in QoL as per SF-36 questionnaire domains over 12 months of Ruxo treatmentBaseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of Ruxo treatmentThe difference in QoL means of SF-36 domains at different time-points of Ruxo treatment as compared to their Baseline will be analyzed
Change From Baseline in MPN10 Total score over timeBaseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of Ruxo treatmentThe difference in MPN10 Total Symptom Score means by MPN10 at different time-points of Ruxo treatment as compared to their Baseline will be analyzed. Also the percentage of patients with the lowest symptom burden, corresponding to MPN10 Total scores of 0 - 7 (quartile 1), at different treatment time-points (Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months) will be calculated
The Percentage of patients who achieved hematocrit (Hct) control at 9 months of treatment with Ruxo9 monthsHematocrit control is Ht \<45% with the absence of phlebotomy eligibility beginning at 3 months visit and continuing through 9 months
The percentage of patients with positive changes of wellbeing during Ruxo treatment1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of Ruxo treatmentThe number of patients who reported improvement as per Patient Global Impression of Changes scale at different time-points of treatment will be analyzed
The percentage of patients satisfied/dissatisfied with Ruxo treatment over time1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of Ruxo treatmentThe number of patients satisfied/dissatisfied with treatment according to Patient' Treatment Satisfaction Checklist at different time-points of treatment will be analyzed
The percentage of patients who achieved overall clinicohematologic response at 9 months of treatment with Ruxo9 monthsOverall clinicohematologic response will be defined as any participant who achieved a complete or partial clinicohematologic response per the National criteria for response in polycythemia vera (2021) and European LeukNet recommendations (2013). A complete response (CR) will be defined as: hematocrit control (\<45%) with the absence of phlebotomy eligibility ≥12 weeks, spleen volume reduction at least 35% from baseline, platelet count less than or equal to 400 x 109/L, and white blood cell count less than or equal to 10 x 109/L, and symptom regress during ≥12 weeks as well as histological remission. A Partial Response (PR) will be defined as all the above criteria excluding histological remission

Contacts

Primary ContactTatiana Nikitina, MD, PhD
tnikitina_74@mail.ru89627101712

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026