Skip to content

EUS-FNI for Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Injection for Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: a Prospective Multicenter Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05566093
Enrollment
20
Registered
2022-10-04
Start date
2018-09-28
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2022-10-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endoscopic Ultrasound, Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor, Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor

Keywords

Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor, Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle injection, Ablation, Endoscopic ultrasonography

Brief summary

The current study aims to access the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of EUS-FNI for nonfunctional pNETs

Detailed description

The management of nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-pNETs) remains controversial. In general, surgical resection is the standard treatment for NF-pNETs. However, the incidence of postoperative adverse events of surgical resection is relatively high. Recently, several studies have revealed that endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided fine-needle injection (EUS-FNI) with ethanol or lauromacrogol may offer an effective treatment for pNETs. Therefore, a multicenter prospective study is being conducted to further identify the efficacy and safety of EUS-FNI for NF-pNETs.

Interventions

After puncturing with the needle, 95% ethanol under the guidance of EUS was injected into the tumor. The injection volume of ethanol was estimated according to the following principles: (1) The injection volume was not larger than the tumor spherical volume. (2) Injection volume was reduced when the tumor was adjacent to the pancreatic duct or vessel. (3) Injection volume for the lesions with repeated EUS-FNI was reduced.

PROCEDUREEUS-guided lauromacrogol ablation

After puncturing with the needle, lauromacrogol under the guidance of EUS was injected into the tumor. The injection volume of lauromacrogol was estimated according to the following principles: (1) The injection volume was not larger than the tumor spherical volume. (2) Injection volume was reduced when the tumor was adjacent to the pancreatic duct or vessel. (3) Injection volume for the lesions with repeated EUS-FNI was reduced.

Sponsors

Guangxi Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with NF-pNETs are evaluated by cytology or immunohistochemistry. 2. Patients who refuse surgery or observation. 3. Patients who have given their fully informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients who are not suitable for EUS-FNI. 2. Patients who have poor conditions including blood coagulation dysfunction, mental disorders, and mild or severe cardiorespiratory.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The rate of complete ablationAt 24 months after treatmentThe rate of complete ablation on the CE-CT or CE-EUS
The Chang The change of tumor sizeFrom baseline to 24 monthsThe change of tumor size on the CE-CT or EUS

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsWithin 3 month after treatmentThe incidence of adverse events (such as abdominal pain, hematoma formation, ulcer at the puncture site, acute pancreatitis, pancreatic necrosis, and pancreatic duct stricture)

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactShanyu Qin, MD,Ph.D
qsy0511@163.com86-771-5353725
Backup ContactHaixing Jiang, MD,Ph.D
gxjiaghx@163.com86-771-5353725

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026